Jump to Content Jump to Main Navigation

In This Article Mahāmudrā in India

  • Introduction
  • General Overviews
  • Related Concepts

Buddhism Mahāmudrā in India
by
Roger Jackson

Introduction

Mahāmudrā—Sanskrit for the “great seal” (Tib. phyag rgya chen po)—is best known as a system of direct meditation on the nature of mind central to the Kagyü (Bka’ brgyud) orders of Tibetan Buddhism, and significant for most other Tibetan traditions as well. The identification of Mahāmudrā as a central topic of discourse is largely a product of the so-called Tibetan renaissance (10th–13th centuries), but the term became important in Tibet because it was prominent in the literature transmitted from India at that time, especially in the corpus surrounding the highly gnostic Mahāyoga and Yoginī tantras, which expound esoteric—and sometimes antinomian—yogic practices and often relate those practices to earlier Mahayana discourses on such topics as emptiness, mind-only, and buddha-nature. The Mahayana discourses, in turn, are rooted in mainstream Buddhist discussions of the purity and power of the mind, the possibility of various nonconceptual meditative states, and the absence of any enduring self anywhere. The first references to Mahāmudrā occur in early tantric literature (7th–8th centuries), where it most often denotes a ritual hand-gesture (mudrā) that signifies the clear visualization of oneself as a buddha/deity. In the literature of the Mahāyoga and Yoginī tantras (9th–11th centuries), Mahāmudrā has several different meanings, including one of a number of “seals” that confirm contemplative experiences; a “consort” for sexual yoga practices; the empty nature of reality and, especially, the mind; a blissful, gnostic realization of that reality, arrived at either suddenly or gradually; and the buddhahood achieved at the culmination of the tantric path (mahāmudrāsiddhi). In these later Indian traditions, and for much of the history of Tibetan Buddhism, Mahāmudrā was the focus of theoretical speculation, meditative exploration, philosophical debate, ethical reflection, and poetic expression. With its focus on the nature of mind and its common emphasis on direct, formless meditations, Mahāmudrā has proven appealing to modern Buddhists as well, and is frequently taught, practiced, discussed, and written about in both Asia and the West. Its popularity in the West has meant that scholarship on Mahāmudrā has emerged from meditation centers as often as from universities, so the degree of academic rigor applied to its study has varied greatly. The aim of this article is to supply the reader with the tools to investigate the texts and contexts for discourse on Mahāmudrā in India, so although the most academically rigorous studies are highlighted, numerous works that are accurate and informative but lacking a full scholarly apparatus have been included, too. Also, because most traditional scholarship on Mahāmudrā arose in Tibet rather than India, a significant number of the texts cited here are influenced by Tibetan views, so their account of Indian Mahāmudrā must be approached with due caution.

General Overviews

Although it was a topic of increasing importance in Indian Buddhist literature and a central concept in Tibet, Mahāmudrā has not so far been the subject of a comprehensive monograph, and the Indian side of the tradition—vital and authoritative as it is—has not received sufficient systematic study. An understanding of Indian discussions of Mahāmudrā, therefore, must be drawn from disparate sources of various kinds, only a few of which really qualify as “general overviews.” Two print encyclopedia and one online library entries on Mahāmudrā have appeared recently: Quintman 2003, Jackson 2005, and Jackson 2011; all three provide overarching synopses but are necessarily quite brief—Jackson’s go into the Indian material in greater detail than Quintman’s. Jackson 2008 surveys the Indian literature on Mahāmudrā that was eventually regarded as “canonical” by Tibetan authors, and so gives a reasonable overview of the textual traditions that might be regarded as forming an Indian Mahāmudrā corpus. Dakpo Tashi Namgyel 2006 is a translation of the Tibetan Kagyü scholar’s (Dvags po Bkra shsis rnam rgyal, b. 1512–d. 1587) classic insider’s overview of the tradition, which includes many useful citations from Indian works, while Brunnhölzl 2007 contains translations of a range of texts, from both Indian and Tibetan traditions, many of which are foundational for the study of Mahāmudrā.

  • Brunnhölzl, Karl, trans. Straight from the Heart: Buddhist Pith Instructions. Ithaca, NY: Snow Lion, 2007.

    E-mail Citation »

    This wide-ranging (though, regrettably, unindexed) anthology of Indian and Tibetan texts conveying “pith instructions” (Tib. man ngag) includes translations of many texts of significance to Mahāmudrā traditions, including important works by Nāgārjuna, Tilopa, and Maitrīpa.

  • Dakpo Tashi Namgyel. Mahāmudrā: The Moonlight. Quintessence of Mind and Meditation. Translated by Lobsang P. Lhalungpa. 2d ed. Boston: Wisdom Publications, 2006.

    E-mail Citation »

    This pioneering translation of Dakpo Tashi Namgyel’s influential 16th-century compendium of Kagyü Mahāmudrā ideas and practices (first published in 1986) is a trove of textual citations and meditation instructions, marred only by its skimpy scholarly apparatus and lack of an index. Indian sources, both sutra- and tantra-based, are scattered throughout, but are especially concentrated on pp. 97–105.

  • Jackson, Roger. “Mahāmudrā: Natural Mind in Indian and Tibetan Buddhism.” Religion Compass 5.7 (2011): 286–299.

    DOI: 10.1111/j.1749-8171.2011.00283.xE-mail Citation »

    Overview of Mahāmudrā that is structured similarly to Jackson 2005, but goes into the material in somewhat greater depth, and reflects some scholarship published since the earlier article.

  • Jackson, Roger R. “Mahāmudrā.” In The Encyclopedia of Religion. 2d ed. Vol. 8. Edited by Lindsay Jones, 5596–6501. Farmington Hills, MI: Wadsworth Gale, 2005.

    E-mail Citation »

    An overview of the development of the term Mahāmudrā in Indian and Tibetan Buddhism; also includes a description of a typical Mahāmudrā meditation and a summary of Tibetan disputes surrounding the term.

  • Jackson, Roger R. “The Indian Mahāmudrā ‘Canon(s)’: A Preliminary Sketch.” Indian International Journal of Buddhist Studies 9 (2008): 151–184.

    E-mail Citation »

    Discusses the process of identifying an Indian Mahāmudrā “canon” undertaken by Tibetan scholars, and provides detailed bibliographic information on the various arrangements of texts proposed by those scholars. Helpful for making sense of the manifold Indian sources of Mahāmudrā.

  • Quintman, Andrew. “Mahāmudrā.” In Encyclopedia of Buddhism. Vol. 2. Edited by Robert Buswell, 488–489. New York: Macmillan Reference, 2003.

    E-mail Citation »

    A brief, but very clear, summary of Mahāmudrā ideas and practices, with a major focus on usages of the term in Tibetan Kagyü contexts.

LAST MODIFIED: 03/23/2012

DOI: 10.1093/OBO/9780195393521-0084

back to top

Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content on this page. Please subscribe or login.

How to Subscribe

Oxford Bibliographies Online is available by subscription and perpetual access to institutions and individuals. For more information or to contact an Oxford Sales Representative click here.

Purchase an Ebook Version of This Article

Ebooks of the Oxford Bibliographies Online subject articles are available in North America via a number of retailers including Amazon, vitalsource, and more. Simply search on their sites for Oxford Bibliographies Online Research Guides and your desired subject article.

If you would like to purchase an eBook article and live outside North America please email onlinemarketing@oup.com to express your interest.

Article

Up

Down