Philosophy Scientific Realism
by
Juha Saatsi
  • LAST REVIEWED: 08 October 2015
  • LAST MODIFIED: 30 September 2013
  • DOI: 10.1093/obo/9780195396577-0007

Introduction

The scientific realism debate concerns the nature of scientific knowledge. Scientific realists advocate a positive epistemic attitude towards the best scientific representations of reality, maintaining that (at least some of) these representations provide us knowledge about a mind-independent world that is unobservable to our naked senses (viz. inaccessible without scientific theories and instruments). In addition to the key epistemic commitment, realism also incorporates metaphysical and semantic commitments. Antirealist arguments attack one or another of these commitments, supporting various degrees of skepticism about scientific knowledge about the unobservable reality. The scientific realism debate is at the heart of philosophy of science, with tight connections to issues concerning the nature of scientific models and theories, inter-theory relationships, explanation, and the relationship between science and metaphysics, to name a few.

General Overviews

Ladyman 2002 provides perhaps the most accessible introduction to the topic, serving particularly well a complete newcomer. French 2007 is also very accessible and easygoing. Devitt 2008 is a good bite-size summary of the key issues, while Kitcher 2002 is an overview that offers a broader perspective.

  • Devitt, Michael. “Realism/Anti-realism.” In The Routledge Companion to Philosophy of Science. Edited by Stathis Psillos and Martin Curd, 224–235. London: Routledge, 2008.

    E-mail Citation »

    An entry in a leading companion to philosophy of science.

  • French, Steven. Science: Key Concepts in Philosophy. London: Continuum, 2007.

    E-mail Citation »

    This introductory textbook is very accessible and has chapters dedicated to both realism and anti-realism.

  • Kitcher, Philip. “Scientific Knowledge.” In The Oxford Handbook of Epistemology. Edited by Paul K. Moser, 385–408. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002.

    DOI: 10.1093/0195130057.001.0001E-mail Citation »

    A handbook entry with a broad perspective.

  • Ladyman, James. Understanding Philosophy of Science. London: Routledge, 2002.

    E-mail Citation »

    The second part of this introductory textbook is a good primer of the realism debate.

back to top

Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content on this page. Please subscribe or login.

How to Subscribe

Oxford Bibliographies Online is available by subscription and perpetual access to institutions and individuals. For more information or to contact an Oxford Sales Representative click here.

Purchase an Ebook Version of This Article

Ebooks of the Oxford Bibliographies Online subject articles are available in North America via a number of retailers including Amazon, vitalsource, and more. Simply search on their sites for Oxford Bibliographies Online Research Guides and your desired subject article.

If you would like to purchase an eBook article and live outside North America please email onlinemarketing@oup.com to express your interest.

Article

Up

Down