In This Article War

  • Introduction
  • General Overviews
  • Pacifism
  • Jus Post Bellum

Philosophy War
by
Seth Lazar
  • LAST REVIEWED: 08 October 2015
  • LAST MODIFIED: 26 August 2011
  • DOI: 10.1093/obo/9780195396577-0125

Introduction

Wars are large-scale armed conflicts between two or more organized groups. The basic problem of warfare is that it involves inflicting death and suffering on people, who, in ordinary circumstances, would have fundamental rights that protect them against being treated in these ways. Of course, everyone recognizes that wars are problematic in other respects: they corrupt and destroy institutions and relationships, they waste vast sums of wealth that could be used to remedy entrenched vulnerability, and they cause irreversible and massive damage to the natural environment. These are by no means negligible costs. And yet when considering the ethics of war, most start with the killing and the suffering, because if the killing cannot be justified, then the rest is irrelevant: our only choice is to affirm pacifism. However, justifying the killing is a necessary, but not a sufficient condition of justifying wars as a whole. There remain important questions to be asked about how and why the killing may be done. While the permissibility of killing per se provides the philosophical foundations of any theory of just war, the superstructure requires attention to specific questions governing the practice of warfare. In particular, for what reasons may conflict be permissibly initiated? How can we fight permissibly? How can we end wars, and deal with their aftermath, permissibly? The first two—justified resort and justified conduct—correspond to jus ad bellum and jus in bello in historical just war theory. The third is a more novel, less-discussed contribution, coined as jus post bellum by recent scholars. Only a war in which the killing is justified, and which is started, fought, and ended justifiably, can properly be called a just war.

General Overviews

Just and Unjust Wars (Walzer 2006, first published 1977) made an indelible mark on the debate, with which all subsequent scholarship has engaged. Walzer contextualized and synthesized the judgments embodied in international law and the profession of soldiery, and tried to ground them in a theory of individual rights. This last move has invited the most criticism. Some think war cannot be rendered consistent with individual rights and thus advocate pacifism (Holmes 1989). Others think that just war theory can be defended, but there is a huge difference between that theory and the underpinnings of international law. McMahan 2009 and Rodin 2002 are the most sophisticated statements of these positions, while Coady 2008 defends similar conclusions in a more accessible style. Ramsey 2002 (first published in 1968) is an interesting 20th-century counterpoint to Walzer, his theological grounding contrasting with Walzer’s primarily secular approach. Johnson’s overview (Johnson 1981) is undermined by his attempt to be historian, philosopher, and theologian, but it remains an important resource. Coates 1997 offers an accessible overview, which is not too partisan between the alternatives that are carefully set out.

  • Coady, C. A. J. Morality and Political Violence. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2008.

    E-mail Citation »

    Independently develops some similar arguments to McMahan and Rodin but in a style more redolent of Walzer (and therefore more accessible to undergraduates).

  • Coates, A. J. The Ethics of War. Manchester, UK: Manchester University Press, 1997.

    E-mail Citation »

    Accessible introduction to just war theory, setting it in the context of realism, militarism, and pacifism.

  • Holmes, Robert. On War and Morality. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1989.

    E-mail Citation »

    A pacifist critique of just war theory that makes up in vehemence what it lacks in subtlety.

  • Johnson, James Turner. Just War Tradition and the Restraint of War: A Moral and Historical Inquiry. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1981.

    E-mail Citation »

    Johnson’s approach tends toward a scholastic deference to the authority of a just war tradition that he undoubtedly shapes in his own image, but he remains a key figure in the debate.

  • McMahan, Jeff. Killing in War. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009.

    DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199548668.001.0001E-mail Citation »

    The leading contemporary critic of and alternative to Walzer. This book summarizes and updates fifteen years of articles against Walzer. It is far more rigorous, but correspondingly less fluent.

  • Ramsey, Paul. The Just War: Force and Political Responsibility. 3d ed. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield, 2002.

    E-mail Citation »

    A Protestant approach to the ethics of war, deeply influenced by the Cold War and the nuclear standoff. Broadly accessible. First published 1968.

  • Rodin, David. War and Self-Defense. Oxford: Clarendon, 2002.

    DOI: 10.1093/0199257744.001.0001E-mail Citation »

    Philosophically rigorous demolition of conventional assumptions about the justification of national defense, this text also introduces important innovations in the critique of Walzerian principles of jus in bello.

  • Walzer, Michael. Just and Unjust Wars: A Moral Argument with Historical Illustrations. 4th ed. New York: Basic Books, 2006.

    E-mail Citation »

    Undoubtedly the wellspring of contemporary just war theory; as accessible and interesting to military practitioners and historians as it is to philosophers—though its fluency comes at the cost of philosophical rigor.

back to top

Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content on this page. Please subscribe or login.

How to Subscribe

Oxford Bibliographies Online is available by subscription and perpetual access to institutions and individuals. For more information or to contact an Oxford Sales Representative click here.

Purchase an Ebook Version of This Article

Ebooks of the Oxford Bibliographies Online subject articles are available in North America via a number of retailers including Amazon, vitalsource, and more. Simply search on their sites for Oxford Bibliographies Online Research Guides and your desired subject article.

If you would like to purchase an eBook article and live outside North America please email onlinemarketing@oup.com to express your interest.

Article

Up

Down