Just War Theory
Introduction
The Just War tradition is based on the claim that only under certain conditions can war be morally defensible. Just War theory has claimed a middle ground between the realist tradition, which treats morality as irrelevant and even dangerous in the life and death stakes that political communities face in a threatening world, and pacifism, which rejects warfare under any conditions. Just War arguments are typically divided into two basic categories: the conditions that justify engaging in war (jus ad bellum) and the rules governing how war should be fought once it has started (jus in bello). Work on jus ad bellum emphasizes the moral appropriateness of fighting for a “just cause,” defined as defensive, and only as a last resort. The rules of jus in bello are meant to limit the extent of violence in war to what is proportional to the grievances that justify a particular war. Rules of jus in bello protect the lives of innocent civilians and combatants that no longer pose a threat, such as unarmed captives and the wounded, and limit the destruction of property. In recent decades increasing attention has been devoted to the moral rules that should guide how wars are ended (jus post bellum), specifically the political, social, and economic conditions left in the wake of war.
General Overviews
While moral claims about justice and war can be found in the literature of diverse cultures and in antiquity, its modern form is typically traced back to the 4th century writings of St. Augustine. The development of Just War theory in the centuries since Augustine can be understood as an effort by subsequent scholars to apply the work of earlier theorists to the specific experiences of warfare in their own time periods, or to modify or update Just War theory so that it is relevant to the changing political or technological features of war. There has been a surge of interest in Just War theory in recent decades, largely motivated by the American intervention in Vietnam. Other recent topics in Just War literature include the morality of nuclear weapons, the 1991 Gulf War against Iraq, the problem of politically motivated humanitarian crises and genocide in such places as Bosnia, Rwanda, and Kosovo, the justice of terrorism and counterterrorism, and the post-9/11 American interventions in Afghanistan and Iraq.
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content on this page. Please subscribe or login.
How to Subscribe
Oxford Bibliographies Online is available by subscription and perpetual access to institutions and individuals. For more information or to contact an Oxford Sales Representative click here.
Purchase an Ebook Version of This Article
Ebooks of the Oxford Bibliographies Online subject articles are available in North America via a number of retailers including Amazon, vitalsource, and more. Simply search on their sites for Oxford Bibliographies Online Research Guides and your desired subject article.
If you would like to purchase an eBook article and live outside North America please email onlinemarketing@oup.com to express your interest.
Article
- Academic Theories of International Relations Since 1945
- Alliances
- Arab-Israeli Wars, 1967-1973, The
- Arab-Israeli Wars, The
- Arms Control
- Arms Races
- Battle
- Civil Society in the European Union
- Cold War, The
- Colonialism
- Conflict Management
- Constructivism
- Counterinsurgency
- Critical Theory of International Relations
- Demobilization, Post World War I
- Democracy in World Politics
- Deterrence Theory
- Diplomacy
- Diplomacy, History of
- Economics, International
- Embedded Liberalism
- European Migration Policy
- European Security and Defense Policy, The
- European Union as an International Actor
- European Union, International Relations of the
- Fascism, The Challenge of
- Genocide
- Genocides, 20th Century
- Geopolitics and Geostrategy
- Global Civil Society
- Global Constitutionalism
- Global Environmental Politics
- Global Governance
- Global Justice, Western Perspectives
- Globalization
- Greater Middle East, The
- Hague Conferences (1899, 1907)
- Human Rights
- Human Rights Law
- Imperialism
- Industrialization
- Intelligence
- International Criminal Court, The
- International Economic Organizations (IMF and World Bank)
- International Health Governance
- International Law
- International Negotiation and Conflict Resolution
- International Nongovernmental Organizations
- International Organizations
- International Relations Theory
- International Relations as a Social Science
- International Security
- International Society
- Internet Law
- Intervention and Use of Force
- Just War Theory
- Law of the Sea
- Laws of War
- Leadership in International Affairs
- League of Nations
- Liberalism
- Marxism
- Military Science
- Minority Rights
- Multilateralism (1992–), Return to
- NATO
- National Security Act of 1947, The
- Peace of Utrecht
- Peacebuilding, Post-Conflict
- Peacekeeping
- Power Transition Theory
- Preventive War and Preemption
- Proliferation
- Realism
- Reconciliation
- Russian Revolutions and Civil War, 1917-1921
- Sanctions
- Second Sino-Japanese War (1937-1945), The
- Securitization
- Self-Determination
- Sovereignty
- Space Strategy, Policy, and Power
- Spanish Succession (1701-1714), War of the
- State Theory in International Relations
- Statehood
- Strategic Air Power
- Strategic and Net Assessments
- Sustainable Development
- Terrorism
- Trade Law
- Transnational Actors
- United Nations, The
- War
- Westphalia, Peace of (1648)
- World War II Diplomacy and Political Relations
- World War II, Soviet Union in