General international law obliges states to treat aliens in a certain way (alien defined as “non-national”). The standards of general international law governing the treatment of aliens are part of what has been called alien law, which only encompasses the duties of states toward the aliens who are nationals of another state. International alien law can be divided into large areas: admission of aliens, foreigners’ situations in the country, and their expulsion. With regard to the admission of aliens, general international law establishes that a state cannot arbitrarily close its borders, although states may subject entry to their territory to the fulfillment of certain conditions, denying access to certain foreigners or groups of foreigners. Aliens have the rights of recognition of their legal capacity, respect for acquired rights, the right to liberty, the right to access to justice, and protection from criminal attacks, requiring states to punish offenses against the life, liberty, property, and honor of aliens. States fulfill this duty if they protect aliens in the same way as they do their nationals, along with providing the right to consular notification and access in the case of deprivation of liberty. It is noted that the international alien law standards do not impose upon states the duty to authorize work or the exercise of a profession by aliens. Nevertheless, in treaties that create free-trade areas or customs unions, more favorable treatment has been legislated for the foreign nationals or residents of the states parties, in light of those regulations that authorize the exercise of an activity, profession, or job, as in the case of the European Union. Concerning the expulsion of foreigners, the motives supported by international practice can be reduced to the following: putting the security and order of the state of residence in danger; offense inferred to the state of residence; threat or offense to other states; crimes committed within the country as well as abroad; economic damages to the state of residence; and residence in the country without authorization.
The bases of international law are found in immigration issues in Vitoria 1974, and are of special relevance for this topic: Relectio de Potestate Civili, Relectio de Indis, and Relectio de Temperantia. Based on the law of natural society and communication, Vitoria 1974 defines the establishment of the right of foreigners to emigrate with the only limitation being not causing any damage to natives. In the management of what we now know as international law, the right to emigrate was recognized, and in the countries that they emigrated to, foreigners enjoyed all rights, with the only limitation being not doing harm to natives. When referring to this law, Leclercq 1965 says that the right to emigrate addresses the right to settle in another country and the right of the emigrant to become a citizen in the country in which he or she settles. Each of these rights is limited by the rights acquired previously and by the rights of other humans. When referring to the issue of the right to enter a state, O’Connell 1970, a work on international public law, mentions that first Christian Wolff and then Emer de Vattel introduced the idea of the state’s authority to control the entry of foreigners. O’Connell’s work specifies, however, that said internationalists only justified it for security reasons, and therefore the arbitrary exercise of the authority to refuse entry of foreigners was prohibited. Brierly 1963, Brownlie 2008, and Verdross 1931 establish that international law imposes few limits regarding the authority of states to regulate the entry of foreigners into their territory; said subjects determine the conditions of entry, stay, and residence of foreigners. The right to exit a country is regulated, but not the right to enter the territory of another state of which one is not a national, and that creates an absolute discretion for the recipient state to determine the entry requirements of foreigners. On the other side, Cançado Trindade, et al. 1996 locates in international law the prohibition of collective expulsion of aliens, and individual expulsion when the removal of those who legally reside there is arbitrary. In addition, if the immigrant is rejected at the border or remains in the state’s territory illegally, he or she may not be returned to the country in which his or her life or liberty is in danger.
Brierly, J. L. The Law of Nations: An Introduction to the International Law of Peace. 6th ed. Oxford: Clarendon, 1963.
Work on international law that approaches the subject referred to in Part 7, “Limitation upon a State’s Treatment of Aliens” (see pp. 276–304).
Brownlie, Ian. Principles of Public International Law. 7th ed. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press, 2008.
Work in which the subject of aliens in international law is approached in Part 9, pp. 521–555.
Cançado Trindade, Antonio, Gérard Peytrignet, and Jaime Ruiz de Santiago. As três vertentes da proteção internacional dos direitos da pessoa humana: direitos humanos, direito humanitário, direito dos refugiados. San José, Costa Rica, and Brasilia, Brazil: Inter-American Institute of Human Rights, International Committee of the Red Cross, and the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees, 1996.
This work synthesizes the international standards applicable to aliens in the fields of human rights, humanitarian law, and refugee law (see pp. 52–117).
Leclercq, Jacques. El derecho y la sociedad: sus fundamentos. Barcelona: Herder, 1965.
Classic work of legal sociology that refers to the issue of the right and obligations of aliens in society (see p. 244).
O’Connell, D. P. International Law. Vol. 2. New York: Oceana, 1970.
Work of public international law in two volumes, which analyzes the subject of aliens in chapter 22, “Personal Jurisdiction: Aliens” (see pp. 751–815).
Verdross, Voirè A. “Les règles internationales concernat le traitement des étrangers.” Hague Academy Collected Courses Online 37 (1931): 323–412.
In this work, Verdross analyzes the treatment that the foreigners must receive in accordance with international law standards and the rights that constitute the law’s minimum standard. Available online by subscription.
Vitoria, Francisco de. Reelecciones del estado, de los Indios y del derecho de guerra. Mexico City: Porrúa, 1974.
Vitoria became known as one of the founders of public international law in this work analyzing the rights of the Spaniards who emigrated to New Spain (see pp. 60–66).
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content on this page. Please subscribe or login.
- African Commission on Human and Peoples' Rights and the Af...
- Agreements, Bilateral and Regional Trade
- Agreements, Multilateral Environmental
- Applicable Law in Investment Agreements
- Arctic Region
- Armed Opposition Groups
- Aut Dedere Aut Judicare
- Bandung Conference, The
- Children's Rights
- Civil Service, International
- Collective Security
- Command Responsibility
- Common Heritage of Mankind
- Complementarity Principle
- Conspiracy/Joint Criminal Enterprise
- Constitutional Law, International
- Consular Relations
- Contemporary Catholic Approaches
- Continental Shelf, Idea and Limits of the
- Cooperation in Criminal Matters, Cross-Border
- Courts, International
- Crimes against Humanity
- Criminal Law, International
- Cultural Rights
- Cyber Warfare
- Debt, Sovereign
- Development Law, International
- Disputes, Peaceful Settlement of
- Drugs, International Regulation, and Criminal Liability
- Early 19th Century, 1789-1870
- Economic Law, International
- Enforcement of Human Rights
- Environmental Compliance Mechanisms
- Environmental Institutions, International
- Environmental Law, International
- European Arrest Warrant
- Extraterritorial Application of Human Rights Treaties
- Feminist Approaches to International Law
- Financial Law, International
- Foreign Investment
- Freedom of Expression
- French Revolution
- General Customary Law
- General Principles of Law
- Georgia and International Law
- Grotius, Hugo
- Habeas Corpus
- History of International Law, 1550–1700
- Hostilities, Direct Participation in
- Human Rights
- Human Rights and Regional Protection, Relativism and Unive...
- Human Rights, European Court of
- Human Rights, Foundations of
- Human Trafficking
- Hybrid International Criminal Tribunals
- Immunity, Sovereign
- Indigenous Peoples
- Institutional Law
- International and Non-International Armed Conflict, Detent...
- International Court of Justice
- International Criminal Court, The
- International Criminal Law, Complicity in
- International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda (ICTR)
- International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia ...
- International Humanitarian Law
- International Humanitarian Law, Targeting in
- International Investment Agreements, Fair and Equitable Tr...
- International Investment Arbitration
- International Investment Law, Expropriation in
- International Law, Aggression in
- International Law, Amnesty and
- International Law and Economic Development
- International Law, Anthropology and
- International Law, Big Data and
- International Law, Climate Change and
- International Law, Dispute Settlement in
- International Law, Espionage in
- International Law, Hegemony in
- International Law, Marxist Approaches to
- International Law, Military Intervention in
- International Law, Monism and Dualism in
- International Law, Peacekeeping in
- International Law, Proportionality in
- International Law, Reasonableness in
- International Law, Recognition in
- International Law, Self-Determination in
- International Law, State Responsibility in
- International Law, State Succession in
- International Law, the State in
- International Law, the Turn to History in
- International Law, Trade and Development in
- International Law, Unequal Treaties in
- International Law, Use of Force in
- International Trade and Human Rights
- Intervention, Humanitarian
- Investment Protection Treaties
- Islamic International Law
- Islamic Law and Human Rights
- Jurisprudence (Judicial Law-Making)
- Jus Cogens
- Law of the Sea
- Law of Treaties, The
- League of Nations, The
- Lebanon, Special Tribunal for
- Liability for International Environmental Harm
- Maritime Delimitation
- Martens Clause
- Medieval International Law
- Mens Rea, International Crimes
- Middle East Boundaries and State Formation
- Military Necessity
- Military Occupation
- Modes of Participation
- Most-Favored-Nation Clauses
- Multinational Corporations in International Law
- Nationality and Statelessness
- Natural Law
- New Approaches to International Law
- New Haven School of International Law, The
- Non liquet
- Nonstate Actors
- Nuclear Proliferation
- Nuremberg Trials
- Organizations, International
- Palestine (and the Israel Question)
- Peace Treaties
- Political Science, International Law and
- Protection, Diplomatic
- Public Interest, Human Rights, and Foreign Investment
- Rational Choice Theory
- Recognition of Foreign Penal Judgments
- Rendition, Extraterritorial Abduction, and Extraordinary R...
- Russian Approaches to International Law
- Sanctions, International
- Soft Law
- Space Law
- Spanish School of International Law (c. 16th and 17th Cent...
- Sports Law, International
- State of Necessity
- Superior Orders
- Teaching International Law
- Territorial Title
- Theory, Critical International Legal
- Transnational Corruption
- Treaty Interpretation
- Ukrainian Approaches
- Underwater Cultural Heritage
- Unilateral Acts
- United Nations and its Principal Organs, The
- Universal Jurisdiction
- Uti Possidetis Iuris
- Vatican and the Holy See
- Victims’ Rights, International Criminal Law, and Proceedin...
- Watercourses, International
- Western Sahara