In This Article Late Imperial Economy, 960–1895

  • Introduction
  • Data Sources
  • Journals
  • Land Tenure and Land Systems

Chinese Studies Late Imperial Economy, 960–1895
by
Tim Wright
  • LAST REVIEWED: 28 September 2017
  • LAST MODIFIED: 22 February 2018
  • DOI: 10.1093/obo/9780199920082-0027

Introduction

Although for most purposes “late imperial China” refers to the Ming and Qing dynasties (1368–1911), many scholars believe that key aspects of China’s late imperial economy came into existence as a result of a series of changes that began in the late Tang dynasty and culminated during the Song dynasty, known as the “Tang-Song transformation.” While these changes included, for example, the growth of markets, they were by no means limited to—or even mainly related to—economic history but included political changes, such as those in the nature of the elite. Without prejudging the issue, this bibliography covers the whole period from the establishment of the Song dynasty to the first Sino-Japanese War, after which railways and economic modernization began to change the Chinese economy. The old stereotype of premodern China as unchanging and economically stagnant has long been discarded, and scholars recognize that China had a dynamic and successful economy that managed to feed a growing population and developed a range of sophisticated institutions. The stereotype is now being turned on its head, and many are asking whether as late as the 18th century at least parts of China were as prosperous and as advanced as western Europe, whether Chinese commercial and legal institutions were as accommodating of economic growth as those in Europe, and, as a result, how one can explain the “great divergence” that took place between Europe and the rest of the world from (in this view) the early 19th century. A further underlying issue is to what extent models based on the European experience can be used to understand or explain development patterns in China. The most notable example of trying to force Chinese development into a European framework was of course Marxist stage theory. But more recently there has been a wider rejection of “Eurocentric” theories and models of development that are based on the European experience coupled with attempts to develop more distinctively Chinese—or Asian—models.

General Overviews

The place to start, at least in English, is von Glahn 2016, a recently published survey that fills a major gap in the literature by providing an overview of China’s economic history up to the end of the 19th century. In addition, the reader can consult general texts on Chinese history or on specific periods. There are several such usable texts in English, but Hucker 1975 is listed because it has the most easily identified chapters specifically on the economy. Miyazaki 1977–1978 is also a general history that at the same time provides a classic statement of the centrality of the Song period in Chinese history. Ning 1999 is an overall interpretative history of the Chinese economy produced in China.

  • Hucker, Charles O. China’s Imperial Past: An Introduction to Chinese History and Culture. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 1975.

    E-mail Citation »

    Chapter 12 deals with economy and society in the late empire (960–1850); chapters 2 and 7 deal with the economy in earlier periods.

  • Miyazaki Ichisada 宮崎市定. Chūgoku shi (中国史). 2 vols. Tokyo: Iwanami Shoten, 1977–1978.

    E-mail Citation »

    Comprehensive history of China that provides an authoritative statement for the view that China’s “modern period” should be dated from the Song dynasty.

  • Ning Ke 宁可, ed. Zhongguo jingji fazhan shi (中国经济发展史). 5 vols. Beijing: Zhongguo jingji chubanshe, 1999.

    E-mail Citation »

    A collective work organized mostly along conventional lines but, unusually, taking the story up to 1997 and explicitly aiming to examine the reasons for China’s economic rise, fall, and rise again.

  • von Glahn, Richard. The Economic History of China: From Antiquity to the Nineteenth Century. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2016.

    E-mail Citation »

    Based on an impressive array of Chinese-, Japanese-, and European-language sources, this book surveys Chinese economic history from the neolithic period to 1900. The last four (very substantial) chapters deal with the period covered by this article. Refutes any idea of an unchanging premodern China, and stresses the role of the state.

back to top

Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content on this page. Please subscribe or login.

How to Subscribe

Oxford Bibliographies Online is available by subscription and perpetual access to institutions. For more information or to contact an Oxford Sales Representative click here.

Article

Up

Down