Day Fines
- LAST MODIFIED: 25 August 2021
- DOI: 10.1093/obo/9780195396607-0303
- LAST MODIFIED: 25 August 2021
- DOI: 10.1093/obo/9780195396607-0303
Introduction
The day fine concept consists in imposing fines in such a structured way that the final amount of the fine is directly proportionate to offenders’ means and to the offense’s seriousness. This is achieved by multiplication of two quantities: the amount of one day fine and the number of day fines. The amount of one day fine is set in proportion to offenders’ means, while the number of day fines reflects the offense’s seriousness. In some—especially Anglophone—countries the day fine is called either a structured fine, as there is a clear structure of how the fine is calculated, or a unit fine, as offenders’ means serve as a basis for calculating one day fine unit. The systematic way of assessing offenders’ means is what differentiates day fines from fixed fines: by setting only the final amount, fixed fines might be proportional to offenders’ means, yet such a relationship is unclear, unverifiable, and likely inconsistent across sentencers. There are several rationales for making explicit the relationship between offenders’ means and a fine. Consequentionalists (utilitarians) support day fines because they are supposed to similarly deter offenders of different wealth. Those less concerned with utilitarian theories support day fines because they better communicate the appropriate amount of censure via hard treatment to offenders than fixed fines. Day fines further limit their unequal impact on disadvantaged groups upon default: if a fine is set in proportion to offenders’ means, the ratio of poor offenders defaulting and serving a prison sentence is likely to decrease when compared with not setting a fine in direct proportion to offenders’ means. Sentencing scholarship would prefer day fines over fixed fines as they are an expression of principled sentencing and they likely limit disparities in assessing offenders’ means. Day fines are used especially in Continental Europe and in Latin America. Even though the Anglophone world often strove to introduce day fines, and sometimes succeeded, the day fine concept was never widely accepted in the common-law systems. The large amount of scholarship published in English thus retells Continental experiences; suggests ways of implementing day fines, especially in the United States, where they are neglected compared with Continental Europe; or discusses the pilot projects in Anglophone countries. Readers should be warned, however, that there is still little research on how day fines function in practice, and even on fines in general, even though they the most popular sanction.
Theoretical Foundations
People differ about which cases they consider alike and which are disparate. Why should fines be proportionate to offenders’ means? Bentham 1840 provides the basic theoretical utilitarian background, which is further extended in Eriksson and Goodin 2007 in its explanation of why a time-based metric is better than a money-based metric in sanctioning offenders; day fines are used to illustrate this point. Montag and Sobek 2019 supplements Eriksson and Goodin 2007 by summarizing general discussions over what offenders’ characteristics could be taken into account when sentencing, focusing particularly on the relationship between offenders’ means and fines. Day fines are not the only way a monetary sanction might be imposed in relation to offenders’ means: Kantorowicz-Reznichenko 2015 discusses the advantages and disadvantages of different approaches. On a different note, one of the main tenets of the day fine concept is that fines should not disproportionately influence poor offenders. If the fine is not imposed in direct proportion to offenders’ means, the criminal justice system might at least try to employ measures that will not incarcerate poor offenders at disproportionate rates, as discussed in Westen 1969. It is impossible to understand day fines without understanding fines as well. Einat 2014 presents a short history of fines, while O’Malley 2009 presents a more extensive history as well as an excellent overview of past deliberations over fines, and explains why monetary sanctions today occupy a central role within criminal justice systems. Faraldo-Cabana 2020 further supplements O’Malley 2009 in relation to day fines by showing the lack of attention paid to the concept in the past, especially by Rusche and Kirchheimer 1939, which criticizes fines for disproportionately affecting poor offenders. All fines are not of the same kind. O’Malley 2009 distinguishes penal and regulatory fines in a slightly similar way, and Sandel 2012 divides monetary sanctions into fines and fees. These distinctions are crucial, as they imply fines fulfill different roles in distinct areas of legal systems, and not all types of fines need to be—or indeed should be—proportional to offenders’ means. These issues are discussed in detail in Drápal 2019, which examines (among others) which administrative fines should be directly proportionate to offenders’ means and which should not.
Bentham, J. 1840. Theory of legislation. Vol. 2, Principles of the penal code. Boston: Weeks, Jordan and Company.
While not directly discussing day fines, the utilitarian position dictates Bentham to formulate that fines should be proportional to offenders’ means. Theoretical foundations of day fines related to deterrence and equality are presented in this work. On pecuniary punishment, see pp. 132–133.
Drápal, J. 2019. Přiměřenost peněžité sankce k majetku pachatele. Prague: Wolters Kluwer.
A monograph dedicated to the relationship between offenders’ means and monetary sanctions. It discusses its application and theory in criminal, administrative, and constitutional law in the Czech Republic and across Europe. Available only in Czech, also in an electronic form.
Einat, T. 2014. History of fines. In Encyclopedia of criminology and criminal justice. Edited by G. Bruinsma and D. Weisburd, 2149–2153. New York: Springer..
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4614-5690-2_275
Short and concise presentation of history of fines.
Eriksson, L., and R. E. Goodin. 2007. The measuring rod of time: The example of Swedish day-fines. Journal of Applied Philosophy 24.2: 125–136.
DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-5930.2007.00376.x
Presentation of the advantages of employing a time-based rather than money-based metric when imposing sanctions. Day fines and the arguments for and against their introduction into the Swedish criminal justice system are used as an example for making this point.
Faraldo-Cabana, P. 2020. On the political economy of fines: Rusche and Kirchheimer’s Punishment and Social Structure revisited. European Journal of the History of Economic Thought 27.5: 661–681.
DOI: 10.1080/09672567.2020.1739104
A debate over an absence of discussion of the day fine concept in the influential book Rusche and Kirchheimer 1939.
Kantorowicz-Reznichenko, E. 2015. Day-fines: Should the rich pay more? Review of Law & Economics 11.3: 481–501.
Overview of different ways of fixing fines, with a specific focus on day fines and a comparison of various models from an economic perspective.
Montag, J., and T. Sobek. 2019. Subjective punishment. In Encyclopedia of law and economics. Edited by A. Marciano and G. B. Ramello, 1970–1978. New York: Springer.
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4614-7753-2_720
A short theoretical overview of approaches to whether individual characteristics of offenders should be considered upon sentencing, with a specific focus on fines and wealth.
O’Malley, P. 2009. The currency of justice. Abingdon, UK: Routledge-Cavendish.
A seminal work enabling readers to understand the position of the fine in the criminal justice system. It uncovers the historical roots of the day fine concept (the emergence of surplus income), and discusses the fine’s application in different contexts (as penal and regulatory fine) and an institute similar to it: monetary damages. It explains why fines became the most widely used sanction.
Rusche, G., and O. Kirchheimer. 1939. Punishment and social structure. New York: Columbia Univ. Press.
DOI: 10.7312/rusc92484
A classic text of critical and radical criminology studying the varying use of different forms of punishment across different time eras. Suggests fines could be widely used only when the level of poverty decreased.
Sandel, M. J. 2012. What money can’t buy: The moral limits of markets. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
A distinction between fines and fees is made, enabling more detailed debates regarding in which contexts fines should be imposed in direct proportion to offenders’ means. On fines and fees, see pp. 65–70.
Westen, D. A. 1969. Fines, imprisonment, and the poor: “Thirty dollars or thirty days.” California Law Review 57.3: 778–821.
DOI: 10.2307/3479718
A discussion of the consequences of imposing a fine that is not proportionate to offenders’ means for poor offenders. It provides detailed historical discussion of Anglo-Saxon approaches to dealing with these issues.
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content on this page. Please subscribe or login.
How to Subscribe
Oxford Bibliographies Online is available by subscription and perpetual access to institutions. For more information or to contact an Oxford Sales Representative click here.
Article
- Active Offender Research
- Actus Reus
- Adler, Freda
- Adversarial System of Justice
- Adverse Childhood Experiences
- Aging Prison Population, The
- Airport and Airline Security
- Alcohol and Drug Prohibition
- Alcohol Use, Policy and Crime
- Alt-Right Gangs and White Power Youth Groups
- Animals, Crimes Against
- Anomie
- Arson
- Art Crime
- Back-End Sentencing and Parole Revocation
- Bail and Pretrial Detention
- Batterer Intervention Programs
- Bentham, Jeremy
- Big Data and Communities and Crime
- Biosocial Criminology
- Blackmail
- Black's Theory of Law and Social Control
- Blumstein, Alfred
- Boot Camps and Shock Incarceration Programs
- Burglary, Residential
- Bystander Intervention
- Capital Punishment
- Chambliss, William
- Chicago School of Criminology, The
- Child Maltreatment
- Chinese Triad Society
- Civil Protection Orders
- Collateral Consequences of Felony Conviction and Imprisonm...
- Collective Efficacy
- Commercial and Bank Robbery
- Commercial Sexual Exploitation of Children
- Communicating Scientific Findings in the Courtroom
- Community Change and Crime
- Community Corrections
- Community Disadvantage and Crime
- Community-Based Justice Systems
- Community-Based Substance Use Prevention
- Comparative Criminal Justice Systems
- CompStat Models of Police Performance Management
- Confessions, False and Coerced
- Conservation Criminology
- Consumer Fraud
- Contextual Analysis of Crime
- Control Balance Theory
- Convict Criminology
- Co-Offending and the Role of Accomplices
- Corporate Crime
- Costs of Crime and Justice
- Courts, Drug
- Courts, Juvenile
- Courts, Mental Health
- Courts, Problem-Solving
- Crime and Justice in Latin America
- Crime, Campus
- Crime Control Policy
- Crime Control, Politics of
- Crime, (In)Security, and Islam
- Crime Prevention, Delinquency and
- Crime Prevention, Situational
- Crime Prevention, Voluntary Organizations and
- Crime Trends
- Crime Victims' Rights Movement
- Criminal Career Research
- Criminal Decision Making, Emotions in
- Criminal Justice Data Sources
- Criminal Justice Ethics
- Criminal Justice Fines and Fees
- Criminal Justice Reform, Politics of
- Criminal Justice System, Discretion in the
- Criminal Records
- Criminal Retaliation
- Criminal Talk
- Criminology and Political Science
- Criminology of Genocide, The
- Critical Criminology
- Cross-National Crime
- Cross-Sectional Research Designs in Criminology and Crimin...
- Cultural Criminology
- Cultural Theories
- Cybercrime
- Cybercrime Investigations and Prosecutions
- Cycle of Violence
- Day Fines
- Deadly Force
- Defining "Success" in Corrections and Reentry
- Desistance
- Deterrence
- Developmental and Life-Course Criminology
- Digital Piracy
- Driving and Traffic Offenses
- Drug Control
- Drug Trafficking, International
- Drugs and Crime
- Elder Abuse
- Electronically Monitored Home Confinement
- Employee Theft
- Environmental Crime and Justice
- Experimental Criminology
- Extortion
- Family Violence
- Fear of Crime and Perceived Risk
- Felon Disenfranchisement
- Femicide
- Feminist Theories
- Feminist Victimization Theories
- Fencing and Stolen Goods Markets
- Firearms and Violence
- Forensic Science
- For-Profit Private Prisons and the Criminal Justice–Indust...
- Fraud
- Gambling
- Gangs, Peers, and Co-offending
- Gender and Crime
- Gendered Crime Pathways
- General Opportunity Victimization Theories
- Genetics, Environment, and Crime
- Green Criminology
- Halfway Houses
- Harm Reduction and Risky Behaviors
- Hate Crime
- Hate Crime Legislation
- Healthcare Fraud
- Hirschi, Travis
- History of Crime in the United Kingdom
- History of Criminology
- Homelessness and Crime
- Homicide
- Homicide Victimization
- Honor Cultures and Violence
- Hot Spots Policing
- Human Rights
- Human Trafficking
- Identity Theft
- Immigration, Crime, and Justice
- Incarceration, Mass
- Incarceration, Public Health Effects of
- Income Tax Evasion
- Institutional Anomie Theory
- Integrated Theory
- Intermediate Sanctions
- Interpersonal Violence, Historical Patterns of
- Interrogation
- Intimate Partner Violence, Criminological Perspectives on
- Intimate Partner Violence, Police Responses to
- Investigation, Criminal
- Juvenile Delinquency
- Juvenile Justice System, The
- Kidnapping
- Kornhauser, Ruth Rosner
- Labeling Theory
- Labor Markets and Crime
- Land Use and Crime
- Lead and Crime
- Legitimacy
- LGBTQ Intimate Partner Violence
- LGBTQ People in Prison
- Life Without Parole Sentencing
- Local Institutions and Neighborhood Crime
- Lombroso, Cesare
- Longitudinal Research in Criminology
- Mandatory Minimum Sentencing
- Mapping and Spatial Analysis of Crime, The
- Mass Media, Crime, and Justice
- Measuring Crime
- Mediation and Dispute Resolution Programs
- Mental Health and Crime
- Merton, Robert K.
- Meta-analysis in Criminology
- Middle-Class Crime and Criminality
- Migrant Detention and Incarceration
- Money Laundering
- Motor Vehicle Theft
- Multi-Level Marketing Scams
- Murder, Serial
- Narrative Criminology
- National Deviancy Symposia, The
- Nature Versus Nurture
- Neighborhood Disorder
- Neutralization Theory
- New Penology, The
- Offender Decision-Making and Motivation
- Offense Specialization/Expertise
- Organized Crime
- Outlaw Motorcycle Clubs
- Panel Methods in Criminology
- Peacemaking Criminology
- Peer Networks and Delinquency
- Performance Measurement and Accountability Systems
- Personality and Trait Theories of Crime
- Persons with a Mental Illness, Police Encounters with
- Phenomenological Theories of Crime
- Plea Bargaining
- Poaching
- Police Administration
- Police Cooperation, International
- Police Discretion
- Police Effectiveness
- Police History
- Police Militarization
- Police Misconduct
- Police, Race and the
- Police Use of Force
- Police, Violence against the
- Policing and Law Enforcement
- Policing, Body-Worn Cameras and
- Policing, Broken Windows
- Policing, Community and Problem-Oriented
- Policing Cybercrime
- Policing, Evidence-Based
- Policing, Intelligence-Led
- Policing, Privatization of
- Policing, Proactive
- Policing, School
- Policing, Stop-and-Frisk
- Policing, Third Party
- Polyvictimization
- Positivist Criminology
- Pretrial Detention, Alternatives to
- Pretrial Diversion
- Prison Administration
- Prison Classification
- Prison, Disciplinary Segregation in
- Prison Education Exchange Programs
- Prison Gangs and Subculture
- Prison History
- Prison Labor
- Prison Visitation
- Prisoner Reentry
- Prisons and Jails
- Private Security
- Probation Revocation
- Procedural Justice
- Property Crime
- Prosecution and Courts
- Prostitution
- Psychiatry, Psychology, and Crime: Historical and Current ...
- Psychology and Crime
- Public Criminology
- Public Opinion, Crime and Justice
- Public Order Crimes
- Public Social Control and Neighborhood Crime
- Punishment Justification and Goals
- Qualitative Methods in Criminology
- Queer Criminology
- Race and Sentencing Research Advancements
- Race, Ethnicity, Crime, and Justice
- Racial Threat Hypothesis
- Racial Profiling
- Rape and Sexual Assault
- Rape, Fear of
- Rational Choice Theories
- Rehabilitation
- Religion and Crime
- Restorative Justice
- Risk Assessment
- Routine Activity Theories
- School Bullying
- School Crime and Violence
- School Safety, Security, and Discipline
- Search Warrants
- Seasonality and Crime
- Self-Control, The General Theory:
- Self-Report Crime Surveys
- Sentencing Enhancements
- Sentencing, Evidence-Based
- Sentencing Guidelines
- Sentencing Policy
- Sex Crimes
- Sex Offender Policies and Legislation
- Sex Trafficking
- Sexual Revictimization
- Situational Action Theory
- Snitching and Use of Criminal Informants
- Social and Intellectual Context of Criminology, The
- Social Construction of Crime, The
- Social Control of Tobacco Use
- Social Control Theory
- Social Disorganization
- Social Ecology of Crime
- Social Learning Theory
- Social Networks
- Social Threat and Social Control
- Solitary Confinement
- South Africa, Crime and Justice in
- Sport Mega-Events Security
- Stalking and Harassment
- State Crime
- State Dependence and Population Heterogeneity in Theories ...
- Strain Theories
- Street Code
- Street Robbery
- Substance Use and Abuse
- Surveillance, Public and Private
- Sutherland, Edwin H.
- Technology and the Criminal Justice System
- Technology, Criminal Use of
- Terrorism
- Terrorism and Hate Crime
- Terrorism, Criminological Explanations for
- Testimony, Eyewitness
- Therapeutic Jurisprudence
- Trajectory Methods in Criminology
- Transnational Crime
- Truth-In-Sentencing
- Urban Politics and Crime
- US War on Terrorism, Legal Perspectives on the
- Victimization, Adolescent
- Victimization, Biosocial Theories of
- Victimization Patterns and Trends
- Victimization, Repeat
- Victimization, Vicarious and Related Forms of Secondary Tr...
- Victimless Crime
- Victim-Offender Overlap, The
- Violence Against Women
- Violence, Youth
- Violent Crime
- White-Collar Crime
- White-Collar Crime, The Global Financial Crisis and
- White-Collar Crime, Women and
- Wilson, James Q.
- Wolfgang, Marvin
- Women, Girls, and Reentry
- Wrongful Conviction