Police Discretion
- LAST MODIFIED: 26 July 2022
- DOI: 10.1093/obo/9780195396607-0325
- LAST MODIFIED: 26 July 2022
- DOI: 10.1093/obo/9780195396607-0325
Introduction
Police discretion has long been, and remains, a controversial matter. Contrary to the notions that the law is to be uniformly enforced in all places and at all times, and that all persons are to be treated equally under the law, the fact of the matter is that law enforcement is, by its very nature, a discretionary practice. Due to factors such as the nebulous nature of the law, the magnitude of crime, the limited resources available to law enforcement (and other criminal justice) agencies, public perceptions of and support for the police, constitutional restrictions on government power, and the fact that much of the work of the police consists of handling noncriminal matters, police officers must exercise considerable discretion in serving the public. To date, most research on police discretion has assessed the discretion exercised by patrol officers via analyses of police decisions on three types of actions: arrests, use of force, and traffic stops and the consequences thereof (e.g., vehicular search, citation issuance, arrest). The good news is that one of the most consistent findings in the empirical literature is that police decisions to conduct stops, conduct searches, issue citations, make arrests, and use physical force are significantly influenced by legal factors such as offense seriousness, the presence of evidence of criminal activity, and resistance from a suspect. The not so good news is that another consistent finding in the literature is that the discretionary actions of the police can be influenced by extralegal factors such as the neighborhood where the actions occur and the age, demeanor, gender, and race/ethnicity of a suspect. This bibliography provides summaries of numerous studies of police discretion. For organizational purposes, summaries of a few classic and contemporary works of general interest are provided first, followed by summaries of several studies of police practices and policies designed to shape the exercise of discretion. Next, studies of arrest, of traffic enforcement, and of police use of force are discussed. Because many studies have indicated that police discretionary actions can be influenced by the race/ethnicity of a suspect and because relations between the police and people of color have been strained for so long, this bibliography also contains a section dedicated to studies of racial/ethnic profiling and police interaction with people of color. Finally, because of the increased attention afforded to domestic violence over the past few decades, because the police have frequently been criticized for their responses to incidents of domestic violence, and because numerous new laws and policies pertinent to the police handling of domestic disturbances have been implemented (in the United States and abroad), an additional section is provided that contains summaries of several studies of police handling of domestic disturbances.
Classic and Contemporary Studies of General Interest
Throughout the first half of the twentieth century, the discretion of criminal justice officials received little public scrutiny. The police, sheriffs, prosecutors, judges, and corrections officials enjoyed extraordinary leeway in determining when, where, and how to enforce the law. As Walker 1993 noted, it was not until the mid-twentieth century that the exercise of discretion by criminal justice officials was openly acknowledged and became an issue of concern. During the 1960s, Bittner 1967, Goldstein 1960, and Remington 1965 showed the law is not uniformly enforced and underscored the enormous discretionary authority afforded to the police. Also worth mention, Wilson 1968 documented substantial disparities in the enforcement of the law between police departments in different cities and the manner in which law enforcement was shaped by politicians and police administrators. Additionally, it was during the 1960s that crime rates escalated and the public became increasingly concerned about the problem. Crime became such a political hot button that President Lyndon B. Johnson established the President’s Commission on Law Enforcement and the Administration of Justice to investigate crime and the American criminal justice system. In its 1967 report, The Challenge of Crime in a Free Society, the President’s Commission emphasized the central role that human discretion plays throughout the criminal justice system and noted that the decisions routinely made by the police—decisions such as whether to break up a street corner gathering, intervene in a domestic dispute, stop a motorist, search a pedestrian, or make an arrest—“are the heart of police work” (p. 103). Since that time, interest in police decisions and the factors that influence such decisions have continued to receive considerable attention from the public, policymakers, and researchers. For instance, Brown 1981, Goldstein 1977, Mastrofski 2004, Worden 1989, and Johnson and Olschansky 2010 showed that the police must be afforded broad discretionary leeway owing to the limited resources available to the police and the myriad situations they are called upon to handle, but as a result police officers frequently engage in discriminatory practices. Additionally, researchers with the US Department of Justice collect and analyze data on police discretion and interaction between the police and the citizenry; see, for example, Davis, et al. 2018.
Bittner, Egon. 1967. The police on skid row: A study of peace keeping. American Sociological Review 32.5: 699–715.
DOI: 10.2307/2092019
Analyzes observational and interview data gathered via a year-long study of the police in two unidentified police departments, and shows that police officers in dilapidated neighborhoods exercise considerable discretion and that arrests are rarely (if ever) made simply because the law has been violated. Bittner demonstrates how police officers use the law as a tool to help keep the peace, with arrests being made for multiple reasons, such as to prevent a situation from becoming volatile, to satisfy bystanders’ expectations that an arrest be made, or because a person potentially posed a danger to himself or herself.
Brown, Michael K. 1981. Working the street: Police discretion and the dilemmas of reform. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
Analyzes observational data, survey data, and official data gathered in three cities in Southern California and indicates that police decisions are influenced by resource availability and the bureaucratic characteristics of police departments. Also suggests that the police rely upon stereotyping when deciding whom to stop, search, and arrest, considering factors such as cleanliness and clothing, race/ethnicity, the condition of a vehicle, and potential incongruities in a situation (e.g., a poorly dressed young male driving an expensive new vehicle).
Davis, Elizabeth, Anthony Whyde, and Lynn Langton. 2018. Contacts between police and the public, 2015. NCJ 2511405. Washington, DC: Bureau of Justice Statistics.
This report is part of an ongoing series of federal studies of contact between police officers and the public. Via analyses of data from the Police-Public Contact Survey, the authors show the extraordinary breadth of contact between the citizenry and the police, estimating that roughly one out of every five persons age sixteen or older in the United States had some contact with the police in 2015. The report provides analyses of survey data pertinent to calls to the police as well as traffic stops, police use of force, and satisfaction with the police.
Goldstein, Herman. 1977. Policing a free society. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger.
Analyzes the role of the police in a democratic society. Goldstein shows that the police are more than a crime control agency and dedicate considerable resources to handling complicated noncriminal matters, inclusive of resolving disputes between individuals and groups, and facilitating the flow of people and traffic. The study emphasizes the importance of police discretion and the complex questions generated by allowing the police broad discretionary authority (e.g., how to control abuse of power, how the general public shapes police actions).
Goldstein, Joseph. 1960. Police discretion not to invoke the criminal process: Low-visibility decisions in the administration of justice. Yale Law Journal 69.4: 543–594.
DOI: 10.2307/794445
Analyzes observational data gathered as part of the American Bar Foundation’s pilot study of the American criminal justice system. The study indicates that full enforcement of the law is impossible, that discretion is essential to police work, and that there is a need for appraisal and review of police activities. The study suggests that appraisal and review of police decisions could facilitate the fair administration of justice, inform policymakers of the impact of and need for effective laws, and of the need to eliminate obsolete laws.
Johnson, Richard R., and Erica L. Olschansky. 2010. The ecological theory of police response: A state police agency test. Criminal Justice Studies 23.2: 119–131.
DOI: 10.1080/1478601X.2010.485465
Analyzes data from the Pennsylvania State Police, the US Census Bureau, and the Uniform Crime Reports to ascertain what variables may impact “police vigor” (a composite of several variables, such as the number of traffic stops per trooper, average number of arrests per trooper, etc.). The study indicates that state troopers in areas with high crime rates made more arrests, but fewer traffic stops than state troopers in areas with low rates of crime, suggesting that officers who are busy handling crime have less time for matters such as traffic stops.
Mastrofski, Stephen D. 2004. Controlling street-level police discretion. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 593:100–118.
Summarizes and critiques research on police discretion, with special attention afforded to methodological, theoretical, and policy issues. The study indicates that scholars have neglected to consider how civil rights organizations, federal investigators, and police unions struggle to influence the dialogue and debate over matters of police discretion such as allegations of racial/ethnic profiling by the police. It also suggests that much of the research on police discretion suffers from weak measurement and validity issues.
President’s Commission on Law Enforcement and the Administration of Justice. 1967. The challenge of crime in a free society. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office.
The Challenge of Crime in a Free Society is the summary report of the President’s Commission on Law Enforcement and the Administration of Justice’s eighteen-month study of crime and the nation’s justice system. In addition to describing the problem of crime (inclusive of sections devoted specifically to juvenile delinquency, organized crime, drug use, and “drunkenness”), the report provides the Commission’s findings and suggestions for reforms for each major component of the criminal justice system: the police, the courts, and corrections.
Remington, Frank J. 1965. The role of police in a democratic society. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology 56.3: 361–365.
This is a brief but important work on the police and police discretion. Remington—who, among other things, served on the US Supreme Court’s Advisory Committee on Criminal Rules, was a consultant to the President’s Commission on Law Enforcement and the Administration of Justice, and a professor of law at the University of Wisconsin—was one of the first notable scholars to study police discretion. Remington’s research indicates that police discretion is necessary because of the ambiguity and scope of the law and the limited resources of the police.
Walker, Samuel. 1993. Taming the system: The control of discretion in criminal justice, 1950–1990. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press.
DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195078206.001.0001
Argues that the public acknowledgment that criminal justice officials exercise discretion altered the study of the criminal justice system. Walker describes the evolution of the criminal justice system and the role of discretion in the work done by the police and the courts. Additionally, he addresses how the law and criminal justice system may affect behavior, and the manner in which public opinion and political shifts impact the law, the criminal justice system, and the exercise of discretion.
Wilson, James Q. 1968. Varieties of police behavior: The management of law and order in eight communities. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press.
Analyzes data from observations, interviews, and official records gathered from eight police departments located in three states, as well as data from the International City Management Association and the Uniform Crime Reports. Wilson draws a distinction between law enforcement and order maintenance, and suggests the primary responsibility of the police is maintaining order. The study indicates that police officers have considerable leeway to determine where, when, and how they maintain order, and that their decisions are shaped by the demands of the area, available resources, and the operational style of the department.
Worden, Robert E. 1989. Situational and attitudinal explanations of police behavior: A theoretical reappraisal and empirical assessment. Law & Society Review 23.4: 667–711.
DOI: 10.2307/3053852
Analyzes observational and survey data collected in cooperation with police departments in the metropolitan areas of Rochester, New York; Tampa-St. Petersburg, Florida; and St. Louis, Missouri; as part of the Police Services Study. The study examines police actions in different situations, ranking the actions according to their severity, and finding that attitudinal and situational variables had little impact on police behavior and that “protocol analysis” may be more useful for understanding police behavior than conventional research methodologies.
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content on this page. Please subscribe or login.
How to Subscribe
Oxford Bibliographies Online is available by subscription and perpetual access to institutions. For more information or to contact an Oxford Sales Representative click here.
Article
- Active Offender Research
- Actus Reus
- Adler, Freda
- Adversarial System of Justice
- Adverse Childhood Experiences
- Aging Prison Population, The
- Airport and Airline Security
- Alcohol and Drug Prohibition
- Alcohol Use, Policy and Crime
- Alt-Right Gangs and White Power Youth Groups
- Animals, Crimes Against
- Anomie
- Arson
- Art Crime
- Back-End Sentencing and Parole Revocation
- Bail and Pretrial Detention
- Batterer Intervention Programs
- Bentham, Jeremy
- Big Data and Communities and Crime
- Biosocial Criminology
- Blackmail
- Black's Theory of Law and Social Control
- Blumstein, Alfred
- Boot Camps and Shock Incarceration Programs
- Burglary, Residential
- Bystander Intervention
- Capital Punishment
- Chambliss, William
- Chicago School of Criminology, The
- Child Maltreatment
- Chinese Triad Society
- Civil Protection Orders
- Collateral Consequences of Felony Conviction and Imprisonm...
- Collective Efficacy
- Commercial and Bank Robbery
- Commercial Sexual Exploitation of Children
- Communicating Scientific Findings in the Courtroom
- Community Change and Crime
- Community Corrections
- Community Disadvantage and Crime
- Community-Based Justice Systems
- Community-Based Substance Use Prevention
- Comparative Criminal Justice Systems
- CompStat Models of Police Performance Management
- Confessions, False and Coerced
- Conservation Criminology
- Consumer Fraud
- Contextual Analysis of Crime
- Control Balance Theory
- Convict Criminology
- Co-Offending and the Role of Accomplices
- Corporate Crime
- Costs of Crime and Justice
- Courts, Drug
- Courts, Juvenile
- Courts, Mental Health
- Courts, Problem-Solving
- Crime and Justice in Latin America
- Crime, Campus
- Crime Control Policy
- Crime Control, Politics of
- Crime, (In)Security, and Islam
- Crime Prevention, Delinquency and
- Crime Prevention, Situational
- Crime Prevention, Voluntary Organizations and
- Crime Trends
- Crime Victims' Rights Movement
- Criminal Career Research
- Criminal Decision Making, Emotions in
- Criminal Justice Data Sources
- Criminal Justice Ethics
- Criminal Justice Fines and Fees
- Criminal Justice Reform, Politics of
- Criminal Justice System, Discretion in the
- Criminal Records
- Criminal Retaliation
- Criminal Talk
- Criminology and Political Science
- Criminology of Genocide, The
- Critical Criminology
- Cross-National Crime
- Cross-Sectional Research Designs in Criminology and Crimin...
- Cultural Criminology
- Cultural Theories
- Cybercrime
- Cybercrime Investigations and Prosecutions
- Cycle of Violence
- Day Fines
- Deadly Force
- Defining "Success" in Corrections and Reentry
- Desistance
- Deterrence
- Developmental and Life-Course Criminology
- Digital Piracy
- Driving and Traffic Offenses
- Drug Control
- Drug Trafficking, International
- Drugs and Crime
- Elder Abuse
- Electronically Monitored Home Confinement
- Employee Theft
- Environmental Crime and Justice
- Experimental Criminology
- Extortion
- Family Violence
- Fear of Crime and Perceived Risk
- Felon Disenfranchisement
- Femicide
- Feminist Theories
- Feminist Victimization Theories
- Fencing and Stolen Goods Markets
- Firearms and Violence
- Forensic Science
- For-Profit Private Prisons and the Criminal Justice–Indust...
- Fraud
- Gambling
- Gangs, Peers, and Co-offending
- Gender and Crime
- Gendered Crime Pathways
- General Opportunity Victimization Theories
- Genetics, Environment, and Crime
- Green Criminology
- Halfway Houses
- Harm Reduction and Risky Behaviors
- Hate Crime
- Hate Crime Legislation
- Healthcare Fraud
- Hirschi, Travis
- History of Crime in the United Kingdom
- History of Criminology
- Homelessness and Crime
- Homicide
- Homicide Victimization
- Honor Cultures and Violence
- Hot Spots Policing
- Human Rights
- Human Trafficking
- Identity Theft
- Immigration, Crime, and Justice
- Incarceration, Mass
- Incarceration, Public Health Effects of
- Income Tax Evasion
- Indigenous Criminology
- Institutional Anomie Theory
- Integrated Theory
- Intermediate Sanctions
- Interpersonal Violence, Historical Patterns of
- Interrogation
- Intimate Partner Violence, Criminological Perspectives on
- Intimate Partner Violence, Police Responses to
- Investigation, Criminal
- Juvenile Delinquency
- Juvenile Justice System, The
- Kidnapping
- Kornhauser, Ruth Rosner
- Labeling Theory
- Labor Markets and Crime
- Land Use and Crime
- Lead and Crime
- Legitimacy
- LGBTQ Intimate Partner Violence
- LGBTQ People in Prison
- Life Without Parole Sentencing
- Local Institutions and Neighborhood Crime
- Lombroso, Cesare
- Longitudinal Research in Criminology
- Mandatory Minimum Sentencing
- Mapping and Spatial Analysis of Crime, The
- Mass Media, Crime, and Justice
- Measuring Crime
- Mediation and Dispute Resolution Programs
- Mental Health and Crime
- Merton, Robert K.
- Meta-analysis in Criminology
- Middle-Class Crime and Criminality
- Migrant Detention and Incarceration
- Money Laundering
- Motor Vehicle Theft
- Multi-Level Marketing Scams
- Murder, Serial
- Narrative Criminology
- National Deviancy Symposia, The
- Nature Versus Nurture
- Neighborhood Disorder
- Neutralization Theory
- New Penology, The
- Offender Decision-Making and Motivation
- Offense Specialization/Expertise
- Organized Crime
- Outlaw Motorcycle Clubs
- Panel Methods in Criminology
- Peacemaking Criminology
- Peer Networks and Delinquency
- Performance Measurement and Accountability Systems
- Personality and Trait Theories of Crime
- Persons with a Mental Illness, Police Encounters with
- Phenomenological Theories of Crime
- Plea Bargaining
- Poaching
- Police Administration
- Police Cooperation, International
- Police Discretion
- Police Effectiveness
- Police History
- Police Militarization
- Police Misconduct
- Police, Race and the
- Police Use of Force
- Police, Violence against the
- Policing and Law Enforcement
- Policing, Body-Worn Cameras and
- Policing, Broken Windows
- Policing, Community and Problem-Oriented
- Policing Cybercrime
- Policing, Evidence-Based
- Policing, Intelligence-Led
- Policing, Privatization of
- Policing, Proactive
- Policing, School
- Policing, Stop-and-Frisk
- Policing, Third Party
- Polyvictimization
- Positivist Criminology
- Pretrial Detention, Alternatives to
- Pretrial Diversion
- Prison Administration
- Prison Classification
- Prison, Disciplinary Segregation in
- Prison Education Exchange Programs
- Prison Gangs and Subculture
- Prison History
- Prison Labor
- Prison Visitation
- Prisoner Reentry
- Prisons and Jails
- Prisons, HIV in
- Private Security
- Probation Revocation
- Procedural Justice
- Property Crime
- Prosecution and Courts
- Prostitution
- Psychiatry, Psychology, and Crime: Historical and Current ...
- Psychology and Crime
- Public Criminology
- Public Opinion, Crime and Justice
- Public Order Crimes
- Public Social Control and Neighborhood Crime
- Punishment Justification and Goals
- Qualitative Methods in Criminology
- Queer Criminology
- Race and Sentencing Research Advancements
- Race, Ethnicity, Crime, and Justice
- Racial Threat Hypothesis
- Racial Profiling
- Rape and Sexual Assault
- Rape, Fear of
- Rational Choice Theories
- Rehabilitation
- Religion and Crime
- Restorative Justice
- Risk Assessment
- Routine Activity Theories
- School Bullying
- School Crime and Violence
- School Safety, Security, and Discipline
- Search Warrants
- Seasonality and Crime
- Self-Control, The General Theory:
- Self-Report Crime Surveys
- Sentencing Enhancements
- Sentencing, Evidence-Based
- Sentencing Guidelines
- Sentencing Policy
- Sex Crimes
- Sex Offender Policies and Legislation
- Sex Trafficking
- Sexual Revictimization
- Situational Action Theory
- Snitching and Use of Criminal Informants
- Social and Intellectual Context of Criminology, The
- Social Construction of Crime, The
- Social Control of Tobacco Use
- Social Control Theory
- Social Disorganization
- Social Ecology of Crime
- Social Learning Theory
- Social Networks
- Social Threat and Social Control
- Solitary Confinement
- South Africa, Crime and Justice in
- Sport Mega-Events Security
- Stalking and Harassment
- State Crime
- State Dependence and Population Heterogeneity in Theories ...
- Strain Theories
- Street Code
- Street Robbery
- Substance Use and Abuse
- Surveillance, Public and Private
- Sutherland, Edwin H.
- Technology and the Criminal Justice System
- Technology, Criminal Use of
- Terrorism
- Terrorism and Hate Crime
- Terrorism, Criminological Explanations for
- Testimony, Eyewitness
- Therapeutic Jurisprudence
- Trajectory Methods in Criminology
- Transnational Crime
- Truth-In-Sentencing
- Urban Politics and Crime
- US War on Terrorism, Legal Perspectives on the
- Victimization, Adolescent
- Victimization, Biosocial Theories of
- Victimization Patterns and Trends
- Victimization, Repeat
- Victimization, Vicarious and Related Forms of Secondary Tr...
- Victimless Crime
- Victim-Offender Overlap, The
- Violence Against Women
- Violence, Youth
- Violent Crime
- White-Collar Crime
- White-Collar Crime, The Global Financial Crisis and
- White-Collar Crime, Women and
- Wilson, James Q.
- Wolfgang, Marvin
- Women, Girls, and Reentry
- Wrongful Conviction