Responsibility to Protect
- LAST REVIEWED: 11 July 2019
- LAST MODIFIED: 25 February 2014
- DOI: 10.1093/obo/9780199743292-0024
- LAST REVIEWED: 11 July 2019
- LAST MODIFIED: 25 February 2014
- DOI: 10.1093/obo/9780199743292-0024
Introduction
Though a relatively new term, having it origins in the 2001 report of the International Commission on Intervention and State Sovereignty (ICISS), the “Responsibility to Protect” (R2P) has come to dominate the debate on how the international community should respond to intrastate crises (see International Commission on Intervention and State Sovereignty 2001, cited under General Overviews). The concept was established in the wake of NATO’s controversial intervention in Kosovo in 1999 as a means to reconcile sovereignty and human rights protection by reorienting the debate away from the international community’s “right to intervene” to the host state’s responsibility toward its own citizens. R2P’s underlying principle is that states have the primary responsibility for protecting their citizens from genocide, ethnic cleansing, crimes against humanity, and war crimes; should states fail in this respect, the international community assumes this responsibility. While R2P is closely associated with “humanitarian intervention,” it encompasses more than just determining the grounds for military action for human protection; the concept includes issues related to the prevention of mass atrocities, nonforcible conflict resolution, and post-conflict reconstruction. R2P was recognized in the 2005 World Summit Outcome Document (cited under United Nations Documents) by UN member states, thereby providing the concept with a formal status, albeit a somewhat ambiguous one. Since the ICISS report the concept has evolved, and both its meaning and status have become sources of significant debate, particularly whether R2P constitutes a norm or a legal principle. The concept has, nonetheless, undeniably entered the international political lexicon; the UN Security Council, General Assembly, and Secretary-General have referred to R2P many times since 2005, while a number of think tanks and pressure groups have been established to publicize the concept and champion its implementation. Debate rages as to the efficacy of R2P, with some advocates claiming it has revolutionary significance, while others argue it is merely a slogan that does not significantly influence the behavior of states. The 2011 intervention in Libya was welcomed by many prominent proponents of R2P as evidence of its impact, but the subsequent crisis in Syria dampened the enthusiasm.
General Overviews
While “Responsibility to Protect” (R2P) is a term that is regularly discussed in academia, the media, and at international political forums, significant contestation (if not outright confusion) exists as to its precise meaning. The term, though new, is a modern rendering of an old debate (see History of Humanitarian Intervention), and interdisciplinary overviews on the ethical and legal questions that predate R2P, such as Lang 2003, provide essential contextual insight. The original report on the Responsibility to Protect, International Commission on Intervention and State Sovereignty 2001, constitutes a succinct definition of R2P’s initial manifestation, though the concept has changed in important respects since its publication. A number of think tanks and research centers (see Global Civil Society) have been established to clarify R2P as well as lobby for its implementation, such as the Global Centre for the Responsibility to Protect. Many within academia have sought to identify the parameters of R2P and dispel the various misunderstandings that surround it, as seen in Bellamy 2010. This is mirrored in the efforts made by policymakers and prominent proponents of the concept to clarify R2P and identify evidence of its efficacy, as seen in Evans 2008 and Luck 2011. Knight and Egerton 2012 and Hehir 2013 are indicative of a growing body of literature that has sought to present an objective understanding of R2P and the broader conceptual issues and debates that surround it.
Bellamy, Alex. Global Politics and the Responsibility to Protect. London: Routledge, 2010.
An in-depth and positive analysis of the origins and nature of R2P that details the various junctures in R2P’s evolution, how they impacted on the concept, and its contemporary relevance today.
Evans, Gareth. The Responsibility to Protect: Ending Mass Atrocity Crimes Once and For All. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution, 2008.
Evans, one of the ICISS cochairs, has been a vocal proponent of the Responsibility to Protect concept. Here he defines the remit of R2P, contrasting his version with the erroneous representations propounded by critics and overzealous supporters, and provides empirical observations to demonstrate that R2P works and will, so he claims, continue to positively influence future responses to mass atrocities.
Global Centre for the Responsibility to Protect.
This NGO was established to promote the concept of R2P. The website is a useful repository and provides an extensive overview of R2P, including links to core documents, Secretary-General reports, Security Council and General Assembly resolutions, and key commentaries.
Hehir, Aidan. Humanitarian Intervention: An Introduction. 2d ed. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave, 2013.
Written for those relatively new to the subject, this textbook provides a comprehensive overview of the issues and debates central to humanitarian intervention and R2P. Includes a detailed focus on R2P, its meaning and evolution, as well as five case-study chapters.
International Commission on Intervention and State Sovereignty. The Responsibility to Protect: Report of the International Commission on Intervention and State Sovereignty. Ottawa, ON: International Development Research Centre, 2001.
The original ICISS report, which has served as a primary focus for the debate since; while R2P today has undeniably changed since this initial rendering, the report is essential reading for anyone seeking to understand the concept.
Knight, Andy, and Frasier Egerton, eds. The Routledge Handbook of the Responsibility to Protect. London: Routledge, 2012.
A comprehensive cross-disciplinary introduction to R2P, which boasts an impressive array of experts. Details the origins, contours, and implementation of R2P, and includes analyses of a number of case studies.
Lang, Anthony, ed. Just Intervention. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press, 2003.
Provides a comprehensive interdisciplinary reflection on the dilemmas underlying R2P and humanitarian intervention generally, and situates these in broader historical, legal, and ethical traditions and debates. Case-study chapters provide complementary qualitative insights
Luck, Edward C. “The Responsibility to Protect: The First Decade.” Global Responsibility to Protect 3.4 (2011): 387–399.
Dr Luck served as UN Special Adviser to the Secretary-General on the Responsibility to Protect from 2008 to 2012. In this article he provides a positive overview of R2P’s efficacy since its inception and attempts to clarify its purview.
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content on this page. Please subscribe or login.
How to Subscribe
Oxford Bibliographies Online is available by subscription and perpetual access to institutions. For more information or to contact an Oxford Sales Representative click here.
Article
- Academic Theories of International Relations Since 1945
- Alliances
- Al-Qaeda in the Islamic Maghreb
- Al-Shabaab
- Arab-Israeli Wars
- Arab-Israeli Wars, 1967-1973, The
- Armed Conflicts/Violence against Civilians Data Sets
- Arms Control
- Arms Races
- Arms Trade
- Asylum Policies
- Audience Costs and the Credibility of Commitments
- Authoritarian Regimes
- Balance of Power Theory
- Bargaining Theory of War
- Battle
- Boko Haram
- Brazilian Foreign Policy, The Politics of
- Canadian Foreign Policy
- Case Study Methods in International Relations
- Casualties and Politics
- Causation in International Relations
- Central Europe
- Challenge of Communism, The
- China and Japan
- China's Defense Policy
- China’s Foreign Policy
- Chinese Approaches to Strategy
- Cities and International Relations
- Civil Resistance
- Civil Society in the European Union
- Cold War, The
- Colonialism
- Comparative Foreign Policy Security Interests
- Comparative Regionalism
- Complex Systems Approaches to Global Politics
- Conflict Behavior and the Prevention of War
- Conflict Management
- Conflict Management in the Middle East
- Constructivism
- Contemporary Shia–Sunni Sectarian Violence
- Corruption
- Counterinsurgency
- Countermeasures in International Law
- Coups and Mutinies
- Criminal Law, International
- Critical Theory of International Relations
- Cuban Missile Crisis, The
- Cultural Diplomacy
- Cyber Security
- Cyber Warfare
- Decision-Making, Poliheuristic Theory of
- Demobilization, Post World War I
- Democracies and World Order
- Democracy and Conflict
- Democracy in World Politics
- Deterrence Theory
- Development
- Diasporas
- Digital Diplomacy
- Diplomacy
- Diplomacy, Gender and
- Diplomacy, History of
- Diplomacy in the ASEAN
- Diplomacy, Public
- Disaster Diplomacy
- Diversionary Theory of War
- Drone Warfare
- Eastern Front (World War I)
- Economic Coercion and Sanctions
- Economics, International
- Embedded Liberalism
- Emerging Powers and BRICS
- Emotions
- Empirical Testing of Formal Models
- Energy and International Security
- Environmental Peacebuilding
- Epidemic Diseases and their Effects on History
- Ethics and Morality in International Relations
- Ethnicity in International Relations
- European Migration Policy
- European Security and Defense Policy, The
- European Union as an International Actor
- European Union, International Relations of the
- Experiments
- Face-to-Face Diplomacy
- Fascism, The Challenge of
- Feminist Methodologies in International Relations
- Feminist Security Studies
- Food Security
- Forecasting in International Relations
- Foreign Aid and Assistance
- Foreign Direct Investment
- Foreign Policy Decision-Making
- Foreign Policy of Non-democratic Regimes
- Foreign Policy of Saudi Arabia
- Foreign Policy, Theories of
- French Empire, 20th-Century
- From Club to Network Diplomacy
- Future of NATO
- Game Theory and Interstate Conflict
- Gender and Terrorism
- Genocide
- Genocide, Politicide, and Mass Atrocities Against Civilian...
- Genocides, 20th Century
- Geopolitics and Geostrategy
- Germany in World War II
- Global Citizenship
- Global Civil Society
- Global Constitutionalism
- Global Environmental Politics
- Global Ethic of Care
- Global Governance
- Global Justice, Western Perspectives
- Globalization
- Governance of the Arctic
- Grand Strategy
- Greater Middle East, The
- Greek Crisis
- Hague Conferences (1899, 1907)
- Hegemony
- Hezbollah
- Hierarchies in International Relations
- History and International Relations
- Human Nature in International Relations
- Human Rights
- Human Rights and Humanitarian Diplomacy
- Human Rights, Feminism and
- Human Rights Law
- Human Security
- Hybrid Warfare
- Ideal Diplomat, The
- Idealism
- Identity and Foreign Policy
- Ideology, Values, and Foreign Policy
- Illicit Trade and Smuggling
- Imperialism
- Indian Foreign Policy
- Indian Perspectives on International Relations, War, and C...
- Indigenous Rights
- Industrialization
- Intelligence
- Intelligence Oversight
- Internal Displacement
- International Conflict Settlements, The Durability of
- International Criminal Court, The
- International Economic Organizations (IMF and World Bank)
- International Health Governance
- International Justice, Theories of
- International Law
- International Monetary Relations, History of
- International Negotiation and Conflict Resolution
- International Nongovernmental Organizations
- International Norms for Cultural Preservation and Cooperat...
- International Organizations
- International Relations, Aesthetic Turn in
- International Relations as a Social Science
- International Relations, Practice Turn in
- International Relations, Research Ethics in
- International Relations Theory
- International Security
- International Society
- International Society, Theorizing
- International Support For Nonstate Armed Groups
- Internet Law
- Interstate Cooperation Theory and International Institutio...
- Intervention and Use of Force
- Interviews and Focus Groups
- Iran, Politics and Foreign Policy
- Iraq: Past and Present
- Japanese Foreign Policy
- Just War Theory
- Korean War
- Kurdistan and Kurdish Politics
- Law of the Sea
- Laws of War
- Leadership in International Affairs
- Leadership Personality Characteristics and Foreign Policy
- League of Nations
- Lean Forward and Pull Back Options for US Grand Strategy
- Liberalism
- Marxism
- Mediation and Civil Wars
- Mediation in International Conflicts
- Mediation via International Organizations
- Memory and World Politics
- Mercantilism
- Middle East, The Contemporary
- Middle East, The Contemporary
- Middle Powers and Regional Powers
- Military Science
- Minorities in the Middle East
- Minority Rights
- Morality in Foreign Policy
- Multilateralism (1992–), Return to
- National Liberation, International Law and Wars of
- National Security Act of 1947, The
- Nation-Building
- Nations and Nationalism
- NATO
- NATO, Europe, and Russia: Security Issues and the Border R...
- Natural Resources, Energy Politics, and Environmental Cons...
- Neorealism
- New Multilateralism in the Early 21st Century
- Nigeria
- Nonproliferation and Counterproliferation
- Nonviolent Resistance Datasets
- Normative Aspects of International Peacekeeping
- Normative Power Beyond the Eurocentric Frame
- Nuclear Proliferation
- Peace Education in Post-Conflict Zones
- Peace of Utrecht
- Peacebuilding, Post-Conflict
- Peacekeeping
- Piracy
- Political Demography
- Political Economy of National Security
- Political Extremism in Sub-Saharan Africa
- Political Learning and Socialization
- Political Psychology
- Politics and Islam in Turkey
- Politics and Nationalism in Cyprus
- Politics of Extraction: Theories and New Concepts for Crit...
- Politics of Resilience
- Popuism and Global Politics
- Popular Culture and International Relations
- Post-Civil War State
- Post-Conflict and Transitional Justice
- Post-Conflict Reconciliation in the Middle East and North ...
- Power Transition Theory
- Preventive War and Preemption
- Prisoners, Treatment of
- Private Military and Security Companies (PMSCs)
- Process Tracing Methods
- Pro-Government Militias
- Proliferation
- Prospect Theory in International Relations
- Psychoanalysis in Global Politics and International Relati...
- Psychology and Foreign Policy
- Public Opinion and Foreign Policy
- Public Opinion and the European Union
- Quantum Social Science
- Race and International Relations
- Realism
- Rebel Governance
- Reconciliation
- Reflexivity and International Relations
- Religion and International Relations
- Religiously Motivated Violence
- Reputation in International Relations
- Responsibility to Protect
- Rising Powers in World Politics
- Role Theory in International Relations
- Russian Foreign Policy
- Russian Revolutions and Civil War, 1917–1921
- Sanctions
- Sanctions in International Law
- Science Diplomacy
- Second Sino-Japanese War (1937-1945), The
- Secrecy and Diplomacy
- Securitization
- Self-Determination
- Shining Path
- Sinophone and Japanese International Relations Theory
- Social Scientific Theories of Imperialism
- Sovereignty
- Soviet Union in World War II
- Space Strategy, Policy, and Power
- Spatial Dependencies and International Mediation
- State Theory in International Relations
- Statehood
- Status in International Relations
- Strategic Air Power
- Strategic and Net Assessments
- Sub-Saharan Africa, Conflict Formations in
- Sustainable Development
- Systems Theory
- Teaching International Relations
- Territorial Disputes
- Terrorism
- Terrorism and Poverty
- Terrorism, Geography of
- Terrorist Financing
- Terrorist Group Strategies
- The Changing Nature of Diplomacy
- The Politics and Diplomacy of Neutrality
- The Politics and Diplomacy of the First World War
- The Queer in/of International Relations
- the Twenty-First Century, Alliance Commitments in
- The Vienna Conventions on Diplomatic and Consular Relation...
- Theories of International Relations, Feminist
- Theory, Chinese International Relations
- Time Series Approaches to International Affairs
- Trade Law
- Transnational Actors
- Transnational Law
- Transnational Social Movements
- Trust and International Relations
- Turkey
- UN Security Council
- United Nations, The
- United States and Asia, The
- Uppsala Conflict Data Program
- US and Africa
- US–UK Special Relationship
- Voluntary International Migration
- War
- War of the Spanish Succession (1701-1714)
- Weapons of Mass Destruction
- Western Balkans
- Western Front (World War I)
- Westphalia, Peace of (1648)
- Women and Peacemaking Peacekeeping
- World Economy 1919-1939
- World Polity School
- World War II Diplomacy and Political Relations
- World-System Theory