International Relations as a Social Science
- LAST REVIEWED: 11 August 2020
- LAST MODIFIED: 25 October 2012
- DOI: 10.1093/obo/9780199743292-0118
- LAST REVIEWED: 11 August 2020
- LAST MODIFIED: 25 October 2012
- DOI: 10.1093/obo/9780199743292-0118
Introduction
The idea of international relations (IR) as a social science is represented in many ways in IR literature. The definition of “science” is highly contested in its application to the discipline. Another issue of contention is whether there is any intrinsic distinction between natural and social sciences. The issue has recently been studied by various communities of IR scholars around the world, and the field is becoming more pluralistic in regard to this question. In this bibliography, we provide an overview of the historical background of claims to science in IR scholarship, of different assumptions about the nature of theory and appropriate research questions and methods, and of the impact of scientific IR scholarship in the production of international politics writ large.
Historical Background
The British scientist and novelist C. P. Snow remarked in his 1959 Rude Lecture at Cambridge that the breakdown of communication between the “two cultures” of modern society—the sciences and the humanities—was the major hindrance to solving the world’s problems in postwar transatlantic exchanges. Snow’s concern echoes the dividing line between two different kinds of study of international relations across the Atlantic since the postwar period. The emergence of behaviorism (Knorr and Rosenau 1969) led the field in America to seek the authoritative status of political “science.” British scholars resisted formalistic or “mathematical” studies of world politics. In a seminal statement on the British classical approach, Bull 1966 advocated humanities, international law, and history as a foundation for the study of international relations. Despite adopting a position that some (Sayer 2005, for example) would find questionable, both behaviorists and classicists shared the view that science is logically separated from values or ethics (Curtis and Koivisto 2010); that facts and values are logically separate, scientific or positive thought is “world-guided,” and normative thought is “world-guiding.” The debate on what kind of social science IR is, or should be, has now diversified (Kurki and Wight 2010). In theory, not only behaviorism but also interpretivism and scientific and critical realism can provide a philosophical basis for social scientific IR (Jackson 2011). In practice, doing IR social science does not necessarily consist in large-n hypothesis testing, but qualitative methods such as textual analysis of policy rhetoric are by now considered to yield equally valid results. This transformation and pluralization of IR social science resulted from heated disciplinary metatheoretical debates about IR’s social scientific status. They have important consequences also for what we now think is IR social science’s contribution to society (Chernoff 2007).
Bull, Hedley. “International Theory: The Case for a Classical Approach.” World Politics 18.3 (1966): 361–377.
DOI: 10.2307/2009761
Bull argues, especially to his British colleagues, that the “scientistic” approach could not advance IR theory, and that formal modeling cannot contribute to our understanding of a quintessentially interpretive subject matter. Because scholars’ frameworks are always imbued with value assumptions, such “mathematical” approaches fare poorly in illuminating the nature of world politics.
Chernoff, Fred. Theory and Metatheory in International Relations: Concepts and Contending Accounts. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan, 2007.
Provides an introduction to the classical positions in the philosophy of science and their respective adaptation into IR. Argues for several uses of metatheoretical research on the issue, including the practical issue of deciding on rival policy options based on contending theories of international politics.
Curtis, Simon, and Marjo Koivisto. “Towards a Second ‘Second Debate’? Rethinking the Relationship between Science and History in International Theory.” International Relations 24.4 (2010): 433–455.
Argues that the “second debate” of the 1960s should be viewed as a revolving around positivist methods, and not the general status of scientific methodology in IR. Shows that philosophy of science positions preferred by current IR scholars challenge the debate’s acceptance of incommensurability between scientific and historical approaches.
Jackson, Patrick Thaddeus. The Conduct of Inquiry in International Relations: Philosophy of Science and Its Implications for the Study of World Politics. London: Routledge, 2011.
Introduces a new, fourfold typology of philosophy of science approaches in IR. Fundamentally challenges the predominant assumption that there is only one way of doing scientific IR, and offers a clear layout of neo-positivist, critical realist, analyticist, and reflectivist metatheoretical frameworks of research.
Knorr, Klaus, and James N. Rosenau, eds. Contending Approaches to International Politics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1969.
Contains key texts of the debate between behaviorists and traditionalists, including the classic statements of Hedley Bull and Morton A. Kaplan on IR as a science.
Kurki, Milja, and Colin Wight. “International Relations and Social Science.” In International Relations Theories: Discipline and Diversity. Edited by Timothy Dunne, Milja Kurki, and S. Smith, 14–35. 2d ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010.
Accounts for the historical formation of the social science debates in IR. Includes a discussion of the impact of different metatheoretical positions in research and deals with the tensions between explanation and understanding, rationalism and reflectivism, and positivism and postpositivism. Philosophical issues are often implicit in IR theory.
Sayer, R. Andrew. The Moral Significance of Class. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2005.
Deploys philosophical realism to moral issues in society. Whereas most of the recent studies on class have used Bourdieu’s concepts, Sayer emphasizes the importance of virtues, vices, kindness, and selfishness. Lays out an argument against splitting scientific and other forms of valuation in social science.
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content on this page. Please subscribe or login.
How to Subscribe
Oxford Bibliographies Online is available by subscription and perpetual access to institutions. For more information or to contact an Oxford Sales Representative click here.
Article
- Academic Theories of International Relations Since 1945
- Alliances
- Al-Qaeda in the Islamic Maghreb
- Al-Shabaab
- Arab-Israeli Wars
- Arab-Israeli Wars, 1967-1973, The
- Armed Conflicts/Violence against Civilians Data Sets
- Arms Control
- Arms Races
- Arms Trade
- Asylum Policies
- Audience Costs and the Credibility of Commitments
- Authoritarian Regimes
- Balance of Power Theory
- Bargaining Theory of War
- Battle
- Boko Haram
- Brazilian Foreign Policy, The Politics of
- Canadian Foreign Policy
- Case Study Methods in International Relations
- Casualties and Politics
- Causation in International Relations
- Central Europe
- Challenge of Communism, The
- China and Japan
- China's Defense Policy
- China’s Foreign Policy
- Chinese Approaches to Strategy
- Cities and International Relations
- Civil Resistance
- Civil Society in the European Union
- Cold War, The
- Colonialism
- Comparative Foreign Policy Security Interests
- Comparative Regionalism
- Complex Systems Approaches to Global Politics
- Conflict Behavior and the Prevention of War
- Conflict Management
- Conflict Management in the Middle East
- Constructivism
- Contemporary Shia–Sunni Sectarian Violence
- Corruption
- Counterinsurgency
- Countermeasures in International Law
- Coups and Mutinies
- Criminal Law, International
- Critical Theory of International Relations
- Cuban Missile Crisis, The
- Cultural Diplomacy
- Cyber Security
- Cyber Warfare
- Decision-Making, Poliheuristic Theory of
- Demobilization, Post World War I
- Democracies and World Order
- Democracy and Conflict
- Democracy in World Politics
- Deterrence Theory
- Development
- Diasporas
- Digital Diplomacy
- Diplomacy
- Diplomacy, Gender and
- Diplomacy, History of
- Diplomacy in the ASEAN
- Diplomacy, Public
- Disaster Diplomacy
- Diversionary Theory of War
- Drone Warfare
- Eastern Front (World War I)
- Economic Coercion and Sanctions
- Economics, International
- Embedded Liberalism
- Emerging Powers and BRICS
- Emotions
- Empirical Testing of Formal Models
- Energy and International Security
- Environmental Peacebuilding
- Epidemic Diseases and their Effects on History
- Ethics and Morality in International Relations
- Ethnicity in International Relations
- European Migration Policy
- European Security and Defense Policy, The
- European Union as an International Actor
- European Union, International Relations of the
- Experiments
- Face-to-Face Diplomacy
- Fascism, The Challenge of
- Feminist Methodologies in International Relations
- Feminist Security Studies
- Food Security
- Forecasting in International Relations
- Foreign Aid and Assistance
- Foreign Direct Investment
- Foreign Policy Decision-Making
- Foreign Policy of Non-democratic Regimes
- Foreign Policy of Saudi Arabia
- Foreign Policy, Theories of
- French Empire, 20th-Century
- From Club to Network Diplomacy
- Future of NATO
- Game Theory and Interstate Conflict
- Gender and Terrorism
- Genocide
- Genocide, Politicide, and Mass Atrocities Against Civilian...
- Genocides, 20th Century
- Geopolitics and Geostrategy
- Germany in World War II
- Global Citizenship
- Global Civil Society
- Global Constitutionalism
- Global Environmental Politics
- Global Ethic of Care
- Global Governance
- Global Justice, Western Perspectives
- Globalization
- Governance of the Arctic
- Grand Strategy
- Greater Middle East, The
- Greek Crisis
- Hague Conferences (1899, 1907)
- Hegemony
- Hezbollah
- Hierarchies in International Relations
- History and International Relations
- Human Nature in International Relations
- Human Rights
- Human Rights and Humanitarian Diplomacy
- Human Rights, Feminism and
- Human Rights Law
- Human Security
- Hybrid Warfare
- Ideal Diplomat, The
- Idealism
- Identity and Foreign Policy
- Ideology, Values, and Foreign Policy
- Illicit Trade and Smuggling
- Imperialism
- Indian Foreign Policy
- Indian Perspectives on International Relations, War, and C...
- Indigenous Rights
- Industrialization
- Intelligence
- Intelligence Oversight
- Internal Displacement
- International Conflict Settlements, The Durability of
- International Criminal Court, The
- International Economic Organizations (IMF and World Bank)
- International Health Governance
- International Justice, Theories of
- International Law
- International Monetary Relations, History of
- International Negotiation and Conflict Resolution
- International Nongovernmental Organizations
- International Norms for Cultural Preservation and Cooperat...
- International Organizations
- International Relations, Aesthetic Turn in
- International Relations as a Social Science
- International Relations, Practice Turn in
- International Relations, Research Ethics in
- International Relations Theory
- International Security
- International Society
- International Society, Theorizing
- International Support For Nonstate Armed Groups
- Internet Law
- Interstate Cooperation Theory and International Institutio...
- Intervention and Use of Force
- Interviews and Focus Groups
- Iran, Politics and Foreign Policy
- Iraq: Past and Present
- Japanese Foreign Policy
- Just War Theory
- Korean War
- Kurdistan and Kurdish Politics
- Law of the Sea
- Laws of War
- Leadership in International Affairs
- Leadership Personality Characteristics and Foreign Policy
- League of Nations
- Lean Forward and Pull Back Options for US Grand Strategy
- Liberalism
- Marxism
- Mediation and Civil Wars
- Mediation in International Conflicts
- Mediation via International Organizations
- Memory and World Politics
- Mercantilism
- Middle East, The Contemporary
- Middle East, The Contemporary
- Middle Powers and Regional Powers
- Military Science
- Minorities in the Middle East
- Minority Rights
- Morality in Foreign Policy
- Multilateralism (1992–), Return to
- National Liberation, International Law and Wars of
- National Security Act of 1947, The
- Nation-Building
- Nations and Nationalism
- NATO
- NATO, Europe, and Russia: Security Issues and the Border R...
- Natural Resources, Energy Politics, and Environmental Cons...
- Neorealism
- New Multilateralism in the Early 21st Century
- Nigeria
- Nonproliferation and Counterproliferation
- Nonviolent Resistance Datasets
- Normative Aspects of International Peacekeeping
- Normative Power Beyond the Eurocentric Frame
- Nuclear Proliferation
- Peace Education in Post-Conflict Zones
- Peace of Utrecht
- Peacebuilding, Post-Conflict
- Peacekeeping
- Piracy
- Political Demography
- Political Economy of National Security
- Political Extremism in Sub-Saharan Africa
- Political Learning and Socialization
- Political Psychology
- Politics and Islam in Turkey
- Politics and Nationalism in Cyprus
- Politics of Extraction: Theories and New Concepts for Crit...
- Politics of Resilience
- Popuism and Global Politics
- Popular Culture and International Relations
- Post-Civil War State
- Post-Conflict and Transitional Justice
- Post-Conflict Reconciliation in the Middle East and North ...
- Power Transition Theory
- Preventive War and Preemption
- Prisoners, Treatment of
- Private Military and Security Companies (PMSCs)
- Process Tracing Methods
- Pro-Government Militias
- Proliferation
- Prospect Theory in International Relations
- Psychoanalysis in Global Politics and International Relati...
- Psychology and Foreign Policy
- Public Opinion and Foreign Policy
- Public Opinion and the European Union
- Quantum Social Science
- Race and International Relations
- Realism
- Rebel Governance
- Reconciliation
- Reflexivity and International Relations
- Religion and International Relations
- Religiously Motivated Violence
- Reputation in International Relations
- Responsibility to Protect
- Rising Powers in World Politics
- Role Theory in International Relations
- Russian Foreign Policy
- Russian Revolutions and Civil War, 1917–1921
- Sanctions
- Sanctions in International Law
- Science Diplomacy
- Second Sino-Japanese War (1937-1945), The
- Secrecy and Diplomacy
- Securitization
- Self-Determination
- Shining Path
- Sinophone and Japanese International Relations Theory
- Social Scientific Theories of Imperialism
- Sovereignty
- Soviet Union in World War II
- Space Strategy, Policy, and Power
- Spatial Dependencies and International Mediation
- State Theory in International Relations
- Statehood
- Status in International Relations
- Strategic Air Power
- Strategic and Net Assessments
- Sub-Saharan Africa, Conflict Formations in
- Sustainable Development
- Systems Theory
- Teaching International Relations
- Territorial Disputes
- Terrorism
- Terrorism and Poverty
- Terrorism, Geography of
- Terrorist Financing
- Terrorist Group Strategies
- The Changing Nature of Diplomacy
- The Politics and Diplomacy of Neutrality
- The Politics and Diplomacy of the First World War
- The Queer in/of International Relations
- the Twenty-First Century, Alliance Commitments in
- The Vienna Conventions on Diplomatic and Consular Relation...
- Theories of International Relations, Feminist
- Theory, Chinese International Relations
- Time Series Approaches to International Affairs
- Trade Law
- Transnational Actors
- Transnational Law
- Transnational Social Movements
- Trust and International Relations
- Turkey
- UN Security Council
- United Nations, The
- United States and Asia, The
- Uppsala Conflict Data Program
- US and Africa
- US–UK Special Relationship
- Voluntary International Migration
- War
- War of the Spanish Succession (1701-1714)
- Weapons of Mass Destruction
- Western Balkans
- Western Front (World War I)
- Westphalia, Peace of (1648)
- Women and Peacemaking Peacekeeping
- World Economy 1919-1939
- World Polity School
- World War II Diplomacy and Political Relations
- World-System Theory