Casualties and Politics
- LAST MODIFIED: 25 March 2020
- DOI: 10.1093/obo/9780199743292-0279
- LAST MODIFIED: 25 March 2020
- DOI: 10.1093/obo/9780199743292-0279
Introduction
Casualties are elemental to war—from Roman battles two thousand years ago to the current conflict in Afghanistan and into the future—combat involves the loss of military personnel. Military casualties not only represent a citizen’s ultimate sacrifice to defend their country but also one of the few metrics that allows comparison of conflict costs across countries and time. In addition to representing sacrifice, casualties capture information—they represent the most important way that wars, especially those far from home, inform and influence people, politics, and society. The human losses of a conflict drive peoples’ assessments of a war; determine their support for leaders; shape their positions on the conflict; and, ultimately, in a democracy, affect votes, elections, civic cultures, and policies. In some conflicts, there are other observable indicators of success and failure, such as armies driving across maps. In many recent wars, however, such as Iraq and Afghanistan, information from the battlefield is distant and ambiguous to those back home. Citizen military losses can make these remote wars feel close, real, and costly. There are four types of military casualties: (1) military personnel who died (killed in action [KIA]), (2) those who are injured (wounded in action [WIA], resulting from combat or noncombat actions), (3) those who are captured (prisoners of war [POW]), and (4) those unaccounted for (missing in action [(MIA]). In some recent wars and, in particular, in Afghanistan and Iraq, the United States reported almost no MIAs or POWs. Thus, given these historical trends, and consistent with much of the literature, this article uses casualty to mean military KIA unless specified otherwise. Scholars have identified a variety of ways for wartime casualty information to travel from the battlefield to the home front, including social networks, news media, leader communications, photographs, and other mechanisms. These studies connect distant battlefields to citizens back home and capture how wartime information influences their assessments, attitude formations, and actions. This research can be considered as having occurred in three expanding waves. While the initial wave of Vietnam War–era literature determined that military deaths negatively affected mass opinion, subsequent waves critically examined how variation in military deaths, such as their geographical and temporal proximity, influences mass opinion and, more importantly, individuals’ assessments. Thus, scholars have shown that military casualties profoundly influence mass and individual attitudes toward a war and its leaders, national and local elections, elites’ wartime positions, democratic political culture, and many other critical political phenomena. Together, the body of literature highlighted here reflects a complex set of relationships between casualties and politics that, while not representing a phobia or condition of zero tolerance, remains essential for understanding wartime domestic political behavior.
General Overview
States design militaries to kill and hurt their adversaries. As a result, the use of military force almost always results in human costs, known as casualties. These costs have considerable impact on a variety of political, economic, social, psychological, and historical dynamics. This article examines the role of same country military casualties on domestic politics. Several reasons support the importance and influence of same country military casualties on the study of war and politics. First, governments collect and publish historical data comparing the total wartime casualties of various conflicts. For example, there is a longstanding table on military casualties in American wars supported by the Department of Defense (DoD) and included in standard references such as the Historical Statistics of the United States. Second, unlike civilian casualties, figures on military casualties are far more accurate. Countries have vast bureaucracies that tally and identify their military losses. Thus, “American combat deaths are the most accurate statistics from the Vietnam War. Enormous effort goes into U.S. casualty reporting in any war, with a name, rank, and serial number standing behind every figure added to the toll” (Thayer 1985, p. 104). Third, military casualty figures are generally public as militaries often release information about individual military personnel deaths and media outlets report loss data. This results in a vast quantity of data across and within conflicts about military deaths. Fourth, in addition to recording casualties, most countries also record critical information about their military losses, such as the day of death, hometowns, service, race, ethnicity, and age. Fifth, many people see military casualties as a, if not the, key measure of war costs, making them essential for understanding wartime opinion formation.
Goldberg, Matthew S. “Death and Injury Rates of U.S. Military Personnel in Iraq.” Military Medicine 175.4 (2010): 220–226.
DOI: 10.7205/MILMED-D-09-00130
Examines factors driving the relationship between WIA KIA figures among US troops in the Iraq War. Finds that the US military suffered proportionally fewer deaths in the Iraq War compared to those injured in previous conflicts, although rates varied during and after the Surge.
Thayer, Thomas C. War without Fronts: The American Experience in Vietnam. Boulder, CO: Westview, 1985.
Highly authoritative presentation and assessment of Vietnam War quantitative data. Thayer provides both a range of data as well as details on the ways data were gathered during his experience as an operation system deployment (OSD) analyst in the Vietnam War, where he participated in collecting and analyzing these data.
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content on this page. Please subscribe or login.
How to Subscribe
Oxford Bibliographies Online is available by subscription and perpetual access to institutions. For more information or to contact an Oxford Sales Representative click here.
Article
- Academic Theories of International Relations Since 1945
- Alliances
- Al-Qaeda in the Islamic Maghreb
- Al-Shabaab
- Arab-Israeli Wars
- Arab-Israeli Wars, 1967-1973, The
- Armed Conflicts/Violence against Civilians Data Sets
- Arms Control
- Arms Races
- Arms Trade
- Asylum Policies
- Audience Costs and the Credibility of Commitments
- Authoritarian Regimes
- Balance of Power Theory
- Bargaining Theory of War
- Battle
- Boko Haram
- Brazilian Foreign Policy, The Politics of
- Canadian Foreign Policy
- Case Study Methods in International Relations
- Casualties and Politics
- Causation in International Relations
- Central Europe
- Challenge of Communism, The
- China and Japan
- China's Defense Policy
- China’s Foreign Policy
- Chinese Approaches to Strategy
- Cities and International Relations
- Civil Resistance
- Civil Society in the European Union
- Cold War, The
- Colonialism
- Comparative Foreign Policy Security Interests
- Comparative Regionalism
- Complex Systems Approaches to Global Politics
- Conflict Behavior and the Prevention of War
- Conflict Management
- Conflict Management in the Middle East
- Constructivism
- Contemporary Shia–Sunni Sectarian Violence
- Corruption
- Counterinsurgency
- Countermeasures in International Law
- Coups and Mutinies
- Criminal Law, International
- Critical Theory of International Relations
- Cuban Missile Crisis, The
- Cultural Diplomacy
- Cyber Security
- Cyber Warfare
- Decision-Making, Poliheuristic Theory of
- Demobilization, Post World War I
- Democracies and World Order
- Democracy and Conflict
- Democracy in World Politics
- Deterrence Theory
- Development
- Diasporas
- Digital Diplomacy
- Diplomacy
- Diplomacy, Gender and
- Diplomacy, History of
- Diplomacy in the ASEAN
- Diplomacy, Public
- Disaster Diplomacy
- Diversionary Theory of War
- Drone Warfare
- Eastern Front (World War I)
- Economic Coercion and Sanctions
- Economics, International
- Embedded Liberalism
- Emerging Powers and BRICS
- Emotions
- Empirical Testing of Formal Models
- Energy and International Security
- Environmental Peacebuilding
- Epidemic Diseases and their Effects on History
- Ethics and Morality in International Relations
- Ethnicity in International Relations
- European Migration Policy
- European Security and Defense Policy, The
- European Union as an International Actor
- European Union, International Relations of the
- Experiments
- Face-to-Face Diplomacy
- Fascism, The Challenge of
- Feminist Methodologies in International Relations
- Feminist Security Studies
- Food Security
- Forecasting in International Relations
- Foreign Aid and Assistance
- Foreign Direct Investment
- Foreign Policy Decision-Making
- Foreign Policy of Non-democratic Regimes
- Foreign Policy of Saudi Arabia
- Foreign Policy, Theories of
- French Empire, 20th-Century
- From Club to Network Diplomacy
- Future of NATO
- Game Theory and Interstate Conflict
- Gender and Terrorism
- Genocide
- Genocide, Politicide, and Mass Atrocities Against Civilian...
- Genocides, 20th Century
- Geopolitics and Geostrategy
- Germany in World War II
- Global Citizenship
- Global Civil Society
- Global Constitutionalism
- Global Environmental Politics
- Global Ethic of Care
- Global Governance
- Global Justice, Western Perspectives
- Globalization
- Governance of the Arctic
- Grand Strategy
- Greater Middle East, The
- Greek Crisis
- Hague Conferences (1899, 1907)
- Hegemony
- Hezbollah
- Hierarchies in International Relations
- History and International Relations
- Human Nature in International Relations
- Human Rights
- Human Rights and Humanitarian Diplomacy
- Human Rights, Feminism and
- Human Rights Law
- Human Security
- Hybrid Warfare
- Ideal Diplomat, The
- Idealism
- Identity and Foreign Policy
- Ideology, Values, and Foreign Policy
- Illicit Trade and Smuggling
- Imperialism
- Indian Foreign Policy
- Indian Perspectives on International Relations, War, and C...
- Indigenous Rights
- Industrialization
- Intelligence
- Intelligence Oversight
- Internal Displacement
- International Conflict Settlements, The Durability of
- International Criminal Court, The
- International Economic Organizations (IMF and World Bank)
- International Health Governance
- International Justice, Theories of
- International Law
- International Monetary Relations, History of
- International Negotiation and Conflict Resolution
- International Nongovernmental Organizations
- International Norms for Cultural Preservation and Cooperat...
- International Organizations
- International Relations, Aesthetic Turn in
- International Relations as a Social Science
- International Relations, Practice Turn in
- International Relations, Research Ethics in
- International Relations Theory
- International Security
- International Society
- International Society, Theorizing
- International Support For Nonstate Armed Groups
- Internet Law
- Interstate Cooperation Theory and International Institutio...
- Intervention and Use of Force
- Interviews and Focus Groups
- Iran, Politics and Foreign Policy
- Iraq: Past and Present
- Japanese Foreign Policy
- Just War Theory
- Korean War
- Kurdistan and Kurdish Politics
- Law of the Sea
- Laws of War
- Leadership in International Affairs
- Leadership Personality Characteristics and Foreign Policy
- League of Nations
- Lean Forward and Pull Back Options for US Grand Strategy
- Liberalism
- Marxism
- Mediation and Civil Wars
- Mediation in International Conflicts
- Mediation via International Organizations
- Memory and World Politics
- Mercantilism
- Middle East, The Contemporary
- Middle East, The Contemporary
- Middle Powers and Regional Powers
- Military Science
- Minorities in the Middle East
- Minority Rights
- Morality in Foreign Policy
- Multilateralism (1992–), Return to
- National Liberation, International Law and Wars of
- National Security Act of 1947, The
- Nation-Building
- Nations and Nationalism
- NATO
- NATO, Europe, and Russia: Security Issues and the Border R...
- Natural Resources, Energy Politics, and Environmental Cons...
- Neorealism
- New Multilateralism in the Early 21st Century
- Nigeria
- Nonproliferation and Counterproliferation
- Nonviolent Resistance Datasets
- Normative Aspects of International Peacekeeping
- Normative Power Beyond the Eurocentric Frame
- Nuclear Proliferation
- Peace Education in Post-Conflict Zones
- Peace of Utrecht
- Peacebuilding, Post-Conflict
- Peacekeeping
- Piracy
- Political Demography
- Political Economy of National Security
- Political Extremism in Sub-Saharan Africa
- Political Learning and Socialization
- Political Psychology
- Politics and Islam in Turkey
- Politics and Nationalism in Cyprus
- Politics of Extraction: Theories and New Concepts for Crit...
- Politics of Resilience
- Popuism and Global Politics
- Popular Culture and International Relations
- Post-Civil War State
- Post-Conflict and Transitional Justice
- Post-Conflict Reconciliation in the Middle East and North ...
- Power Transition Theory
- Preventive War and Preemption
- Prisoners, Treatment of
- Private Military and Security Companies (PMSCs)
- Process Tracing Methods
- Pro-Government Militias
- Proliferation
- Prospect Theory in International Relations
- Psychoanalysis in Global Politics and International Relati...
- Psychology and Foreign Policy
- Public Opinion and Foreign Policy
- Public Opinion and the European Union
- Quantum Social Science
- Race and International Relations
- Realism
- Rebel Governance
- Reconciliation
- Reflexivity and International Relations
- Religion and International Relations
- Religiously Motivated Violence
- Reputation in International Relations
- Responsibility to Protect
- Rising Powers in World Politics
- Role Theory in International Relations
- Russian Foreign Policy
- Russian Revolutions and Civil War, 1917–1921
- Sanctions
- Sanctions in International Law
- Science Diplomacy
- Second Sino-Japanese War (1937-1945), The
- Secrecy and Diplomacy
- Securitization
- Self-Determination
- Shining Path
- Sinophone and Japanese International Relations Theory
- Social Scientific Theories of Imperialism
- Sovereignty
- Soviet Union in World War II
- Space Strategy, Policy, and Power
- Spatial Dependencies and International Mediation
- State Theory in International Relations
- Statehood
- Status in International Relations
- Strategic Air Power
- Strategic and Net Assessments
- Sub-Saharan Africa, Conflict Formations in
- Sustainable Development
- Systems Theory
- Teaching International Relations
- Territorial Disputes
- Terrorism
- Terrorism and Poverty
- Terrorism, Geography of
- Terrorist Financing
- Terrorist Group Strategies
- The Changing Nature of Diplomacy
- The Politics and Diplomacy of Neutrality
- The Politics and Diplomacy of the First World War
- The Queer in/of International Relations
- the Twenty-First Century, Alliance Commitments in
- The Vienna Conventions on Diplomatic and Consular Relation...
- Theories of International Relations, Feminist
- Theory, Chinese International Relations
- Time Series Approaches to International Affairs
- Trade Law
- Transnational Actors
- Transnational Law
- Transnational Social Movements
- Trust and International Relations
- Turkey
- UN Security Council
- United Nations, The
- United States and Asia, The
- Uppsala Conflict Data Program
- US and Africa
- US–UK Special Relationship
- Voluntary International Migration
- War
- War of the Spanish Succession (1701-1714)
- Weapons of Mass Destruction
- Western Balkans
- Western Front (World War I)
- Westphalia, Peace of (1648)
- Women and Peacemaking Peacekeeping
- World Economy 1919-1939
- World Polity School
- World War II Diplomacy and Political Relations
- World-System Theory