Rebel Governance
- LAST MODIFIED: 21 February 2022
- DOI: 10.1093/obo/9780199743292-0308
- LAST MODIFIED: 21 February 2022
- DOI: 10.1093/obo/9780199743292-0308
Introduction
The past few decades witnessed unprecedented challenges to the modern state system among which the rise of nonstate armed groups stands out both in terms of the number and types of groups that have emerged. Since World War II, more than half of nation states have faced an ethnic, religious, or ideological insurgency by rebel groups, which pursued political or territorial objectives against their target states. Frequently, armed groups’ resort to force as a strategy has been coupled with attempts to establish governance institutions emulating states. Indeed, many of them succeed in achieving a parallel political order to the one maintained by states within whose borders they survive. The most notorious groups, such as Hezbollah, Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia (FARC), and al-Shabaab benefit from their capacity to rule over local populations. They extract revenues by taxing those local populations, garnering legitimacy through building court systems, and recruit members to their ranks. Nevertheless, not all groups develop governance capacity. Given that maintaining governance institutions is too costly, rebel groups are anticipated to pragmatically invest all their resources in improving their fighting capacity. What, then, makes a rebel group split its limited resources across two domains (i.e., governance and fighting)? The research on rebel governance emerged seeking an answer to this puzzle. Although we have learned a lot about the types, causes. and institutions of governance from existing research, we still lack knowledge about how international factors such as power distribution, system level shifts, and foreign state support influence are influenced by rebel governance institutions. Scholars need to invest more time in developing a theoretically motivated research agenda to bring the rebels into the center of international relations research in order to predict the future of the modern state system and yield policy-relevant findings about how governance can be reinvented and adjusted to the realities of our times.
General Overview
Rebel governance has started attracting scholarly attention mostly after the emergence of Islamic State (IS) in Iraq and Syria claiming statehood. Several factors such as third-party support, ideological disposition, and inter-state rivalry have been examined in terms of their influence on the mobilization and military capacity of armed rebels. Yet rebel groups are in constant search of recognition and support both from their domestic and international audiences. They need to acquire legitimacy in the eye of the civilians whom they associate themselves with and also to gain the sympathy of the international community to achieve their objectives against their target states. Both audiences’ approval is essential if rebels have statehood claims and their ultimate objective is to secede from their target state and build their own ones. The success or failure of rebels to cultivate such support from civilians has been studied mostly as a collateral outcome of their violent activities without considering that this search for civilian support was a direct and significant motivation behind the development of rebel governance institutions. The seminal work paving the way for the rebel governance research is Kasfir 2005. The paper makes the argument for territorial hold being a requirement for the foundation of political institutions for guerilla governance. Arjona 2009 and Mampilly 2011 represent the key works that name insurgents’ governance of civilian populations as rebel governance. Arjona 2009 also argues that civil wars are not as chaotic as conventional wisdom suggests and that armed groups develop several ruling practices across different cases depending on their material and ideological motivations. Mampilly 2011 begins with a broad definition of governance, “decisions issued by one actor that a second is expected to obey” (adopted from existing research in political science) and defines governance as “the control of social interactions by both state and nonstate actors” (p. 3). Furthermore, the types of institutions rebels develop are also addressed by an extant body of work. Mampilly and Stewart 2021 presents an excellent review of this research and a classification of rebel institutions.
Arjona, Ana. “One National War, Multiple Local Orders: An Inquiry into the Unit of Analysis of War and Post-War Interventions.” In Law in Peace Negotiations. Edited by M. Bergsmo and P. Kalmanovitz, 123–150. FICHL Publication Series No. 5. Oslo, Norway: Peace Research Institute, 2009.
Arjona discusses how order in war zones continue to exist despite the devastating effects of wartime on local institutions. Argues new wartime orders or local governance vary across localities based on the actors or institutions sharing the capacity to rule, the scope of local governance the actors pursue, and their way of rule implementation.
Kasfir, Nelson M. “Guerrillas and Civilian Participation: The National Resistance Army in Uganda, 1981–86.” The Journal of Modern African Studies 43.2 (2005): 271–296.
DOI: 10.1017/S0022278X05000832
Addresses the paradox of guerillas, which have commitment to cultivating popular support. If guerilla groups lose their military advantage vis-a-vis the government they fight against and end up withdrawing from a territorial hold, a requirement for the emergence of guerilla governance, to preserve their military advantage. The civilian support is a function of the relative military power of guerillas in comparison to a target government.
Mampilly, Zachariah Cherian. Rebel Rulers: Insurgent Governance and Civilian Life During War. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 2011.
Mampilly examines variation within rebel governance systems through case studies in Sri Lanka, Sudan, and the Democratic Republic of Congo. He argues that neither the ideology of rebel groups nor the financial resources they have can explain variation within such systems; rather it is the interactions of pressures from civilians, pressures from within-group dynamics, and interests of international actors operating in conflict zones that determine the effectiveness of rebel governance.
Mampilly, Zachariah, and Megan A. Stewart. “A Typology of Rebel Political Institutional Arrangements.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 65.1 (2021): 15–45.
Presents a categorization of rebel governance institutions based on fieldwork and secondary materials. The authors argue that these institutions vary across four dimensions: “the amount of power sharing, the depth of integration, the extent of innovation, and the degree of inclusivity” (pp. 18–19). The empirical findings suggest that rebels engage with preexisting political institutions and civilians along these dimensions, which in turn determine the nature of the rebel institutions that emerge in a location.
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content on this page. Please subscribe or login.
How to Subscribe
Oxford Bibliographies Online is available by subscription and perpetual access to institutions. For more information or to contact an Oxford Sales Representative click here.
Article
- Academic Theories of International Relations Since 1945
- Alliances
- Al-Qaeda in the Islamic Maghreb
- Al-Shabaab
- Arab-Israeli Wars
- Arab-Israeli Wars, 1967-1973, The
- Armed Conflicts/Violence against Civilians Data Sets
- Arms Control
- Arms Races
- Arms Trade
- Asylum Policies
- Audience Costs and the Credibility of Commitments
- Authoritarian Regimes
- Balance of Power Theory
- Bargaining Theory of War
- Battle
- Boko Haram
- Brazilian Foreign Policy, The Politics of
- Canadian Foreign Policy
- Case Study Methods in International Relations
- Casualties and Politics
- Causation in International Relations
- Central Europe
- Challenge of Communism, The
- China and Japan
- China's Defense Policy
- China’s Foreign Policy
- Chinese Approaches to Strategy
- Cities and International Relations
- Civil Resistance
- Civil Society in the European Union
- Cold War, The
- Colonialism
- Comparative Foreign Policy Security Interests
- Comparative Regionalism
- Complex Systems Approaches to Global Politics
- Conflict Behavior and the Prevention of War
- Conflict Management
- Conflict Management in the Middle East
- Constructivism
- Contemporary Shia–Sunni Sectarian Violence
- Corruption
- Counterinsurgency
- Countermeasures in International Law
- Coups and Mutinies
- Criminal Law, International
- Critical Theory of International Relations
- Cuban Missile Crisis, The
- Cultural Diplomacy
- Cyber Security
- Cyber Warfare
- Decision-Making, Poliheuristic Theory of
- Demobilization, Post World War I
- Democracies and World Order
- Democracy and Conflict
- Democracy in World Politics
- Deterrence Theory
- Development
- Diasporas
- Digital Diplomacy
- Diplomacy
- Diplomacy, Gender and
- Diplomacy, History of
- Diplomacy in the ASEAN
- Diplomacy, Public
- Disaster Diplomacy
- Diversionary Theory of War
- Drone Warfare
- Eastern Front (World War I)
- Economic Coercion and Sanctions
- Economics, International
- Embedded Liberalism
- Emerging Powers and BRICS
- Emotions
- Empirical Testing of Formal Models
- Energy and International Security
- Environmental Peacebuilding
- Epidemic Diseases and their Effects on History
- Ethics and Morality in International Relations
- Ethnicity in International Relations
- European Migration Policy
- European Security and Defense Policy, The
- European Union as an International Actor
- European Union, International Relations of the
- Experiments
- Face-to-Face Diplomacy
- Fascism, The Challenge of
- Feminist Methodologies in International Relations
- Feminist Security Studies
- Food Security
- Forecasting in International Relations
- Foreign Aid and Assistance
- Foreign Direct Investment
- Foreign Policy Decision-Making
- Foreign Policy of Non-democratic Regimes
- Foreign Policy of Saudi Arabia
- Foreign Policy, Theories of
- French Empire, 20th-Century
- From Club to Network Diplomacy
- Future of NATO
- Game Theory and Interstate Conflict
- Gender and Terrorism
- Genocide
- Genocide, Politicide, and Mass Atrocities Against Civilian...
- Genocides, 20th Century
- Geopolitics and Geostrategy
- Germany in World War II
- Global Citizenship
- Global Civil Society
- Global Constitutionalism
- Global Environmental Politics
- Global Ethic of Care
- Global Governance
- Global Justice, Western Perspectives
- Globalization
- Governance of the Arctic
- Grand Strategy
- Greater Middle East, The
- Greek Crisis
- Hague Conferences (1899, 1907)
- Hegemony
- Hezbollah
- Hierarchies in International Relations
- History and International Relations
- Human Nature in International Relations
- Human Rights
- Human Rights and Humanitarian Diplomacy
- Human Rights, Feminism and
- Human Rights Law
- Human Security
- Hybrid Warfare
- Ideal Diplomat, The
- Idealism
- Identity and Foreign Policy
- Ideology, Values, and Foreign Policy
- Illicit Trade and Smuggling
- Imperialism
- Indian Foreign Policy
- Indian Perspectives on International Relations, War, and C...
- Indigenous Rights
- Industrialization
- Intelligence
- Intelligence Oversight
- Internal Displacement
- International Conflict Settlements, The Durability of
- International Criminal Court, The
- International Economic Organizations (IMF and World Bank)
- International Health Governance
- International Justice, Theories of
- International Law
- International Monetary Relations, History of
- International Negotiation and Conflict Resolution
- International Nongovernmental Organizations
- International Norms for Cultural Preservation and Cooperat...
- International Organizations
- International Relations, Aesthetic Turn in
- International Relations as a Social Science
- International Relations, Practice Turn in
- International Relations, Research Ethics in
- International Relations Theory
- International Security
- International Society
- International Society, Theorizing
- International Support For Nonstate Armed Groups
- Internet Law
- Interstate Cooperation Theory and International Institutio...
- Intervention and Use of Force
- Interviews and Focus Groups
- Iran, Politics and Foreign Policy
- Iraq: Past and Present
- Japanese Foreign Policy
- Just War Theory
- Korean War
- Kurdistan and Kurdish Politics
- Law of the Sea
- Laws of War
- Leadership in International Affairs
- Leadership Personality Characteristics and Foreign Policy
- League of Nations
- Lean Forward and Pull Back Options for US Grand Strategy
- Liberalism
- Marxism
- Mediation and Civil Wars
- Mediation in International Conflicts
- Mediation via International Organizations
- Memory and World Politics
- Mercantilism
- Middle East, The Contemporary
- Middle East, The Contemporary
- Middle Powers and Regional Powers
- Military Science
- Minorities in the Middle East
- Minority Rights
- Morality in Foreign Policy
- Multilateralism (1992–), Return to
- National Liberation, International Law and Wars of
- National Security Act of 1947, The
- Nation-Building
- Nations and Nationalism
- NATO
- NATO, Europe, and Russia: Security Issues and the Border R...
- Natural Resources, Energy Politics, and Environmental Cons...
- Neorealism
- New Multilateralism in the Early 21st Century
- Nigeria
- Nonproliferation and Counterproliferation
- Nonviolent Resistance Datasets
- Normative Aspects of International Peacekeeping
- Normative Power Beyond the Eurocentric Frame
- Nuclear Proliferation
- Peace Education in Post-Conflict Zones
- Peace of Utrecht
- Peacebuilding, Post-Conflict
- Peacekeeping
- Piracy
- Political Demography
- Political Economy of National Security
- Political Extremism in Sub-Saharan Africa
- Political Learning and Socialization
- Political Psychology
- Politics and Islam in Turkey
- Politics and Nationalism in Cyprus
- Politics of Extraction: Theories and New Concepts for Crit...
- Politics of Resilience
- Popuism and Global Politics
- Popular Culture and International Relations
- Post-Civil War State
- Post-Conflict and Transitional Justice
- Post-Conflict Reconciliation in the Middle East and North ...
- Power Transition Theory
- Preventive War and Preemption
- Prisoners, Treatment of
- Private Military and Security Companies (PMSCs)
- Process Tracing Methods
- Pro-Government Militias
- Proliferation
- Prospect Theory in International Relations
- Psychoanalysis in Global Politics and International Relati...
- Psychology and Foreign Policy
- Public Opinion and Foreign Policy
- Public Opinion and the European Union
- Quantum Social Science
- Race and International Relations
- Realism
- Rebel Governance
- Reconciliation
- Reflexivity and International Relations
- Religion and International Relations
- Religiously Motivated Violence
- Reputation in International Relations
- Responsibility to Protect
- Rising Powers in World Politics
- Role Theory in International Relations
- Russian Foreign Policy
- Russian Revolutions and Civil War, 1917–1921
- Sanctions
- Sanctions in International Law
- Science Diplomacy
- Second Sino-Japanese War (1937-1945), The
- Secrecy and Diplomacy
- Securitization
- Self-Determination
- Shining Path
- Sinophone and Japanese International Relations Theory
- Social Scientific Theories of Imperialism
- Sovereignty
- Soviet Union in World War II
- Space Strategy, Policy, and Power
- Spatial Dependencies and International Mediation
- State Theory in International Relations
- Statehood
- Status in International Relations
- Strategic Air Power
- Strategic and Net Assessments
- Sub-Saharan Africa, Conflict Formations in
- Sustainable Development
- Systems Theory
- Teaching International Relations
- Territorial Disputes
- Terrorism
- Terrorism and Poverty
- Terrorism, Geography of
- Terrorist Financing
- Terrorist Group Strategies
- The Changing Nature of Diplomacy
- The Politics and Diplomacy of Neutrality
- The Politics and Diplomacy of the First World War
- The Queer in/of International Relations
- the Twenty-First Century, Alliance Commitments in
- The Vienna Conventions on Diplomatic and Consular Relation...
- Theories of International Relations, Feminist
- Theory, Chinese International Relations
- Time Series Approaches to International Affairs
- Trade Law
- Transnational Actors
- Transnational Law
- Transnational Social Movements
- Trust and International Relations
- Turkey
- UN Security Council
- United Nations, The
- United States and Asia, The
- Uppsala Conflict Data Program
- US and Africa
- US–UK Special Relationship
- Voluntary International Migration
- War
- War of the Spanish Succession (1701-1714)
- Weapons of Mass Destruction
- Western Balkans
- Western Front (World War I)
- Westphalia, Peace of (1648)
- Women and Peacemaking Peacekeeping
- World Economy 1919-1939
- World Polity School
- World War II Diplomacy and Political Relations
- World-System Theory