Gender and Diplomacy
- LAST REVIEWED: 12 January 2023
- LAST MODIFIED: 12 January 2023
- DOI: 10.1093/obo/9780199743292-0316
- LAST REVIEWED: 12 January 2023
- LAST MODIFIED: 12 January 2023
- DOI: 10.1093/obo/9780199743292-0316
Introduction
The scholarship on gender and diplomacy is a young research field; most of the works referenced here have been written since the mid-2000s, although the first studies appeared in the late 1960s. Still, this is not very long ago considering how far back in history diplomacy as a phenomenon reaches (see the separate Oxford Bibliographies article “History of Diplomacy”), but also in relation to mainstream research on diplomacy (see the separate Oxford Bibliographies article “Diplomacy”). Perhaps this is not very surprising though, given that other adjacent fields focusing on gender are also young (see the separate Oxford Bibliographies articles “Gender and International Relations,” under the subject Political Science; “Women and Peacemaking/Peacekeeping”; “Feminist Security Studies”; “Women and Conflict Studies,” also found under Political Science; and “Gender and International Security,” located under International Law). What distinguishes the research on gender and diplomacy from those related fields is its focus on the role of gender in bilateral interactions via representatives that concern the relationship between the two states involved. Negotiation is one form that these interactions may take, which is why references to negotiation studies are sometimes included here when they involve diplomats. These studies primarily belong to a separate research field, however (see the separate Oxford Bibliographies article “International Negotiation and Conflict Resolution”). The early studies on gender and diplomacy primarily concentrate on women’s informal roles in diplomacy. In fact, the great majority of these studies are of women in diplomacy, for example, as diplomatic wives or members of powerful families, since the number of women admitted formally into the foreign services as professionals was very low before the 1970s. After this, women started pursuing diplomatic careers in growing numbers and the research field shifted somewhat to follow their struggles. Similar research questions guide both studies on diplomatic wives and female professionals, however. They concern to what positions, posts, and tasks women are assigned; the structures and norms of the institutions to which they are associated; and the impact that gender diversity and gender awareness might have on how diplomacy it is done, organized, and perceived. The methods applied in answering these questions are primarily qualitative case studies of individual diplomats, or Ministries of Foreign Affairs in the Western world, particularly of the United States and Great Britain. There are some examples of ethnographic work and systematic comparative and statistical studies, but they are few. The research is also largely empirical and descriptive, which leaves much room for stringent theoretical analyses, causal investigations, and theory development.
General Overviews
There are few general overviews of the research on gender and diplomacy specifically, although there are such overviews on related subjects (see the separate Oxford Bibliographies articles “Gender and International Relations,” under Political Science; “Women and Peacemaking/Peacekeeping”; “Feminist Security Studies”; “Women and Conflict Studies,” also under Political Science; and “Gender and International Security,” found under International Law. The chapter Towns, et al. 2017 and the paper Aggestam and Towns 2019 thus constitute two rare examples. In both cases, the authors argue that the research on gender and diplomacy needs to move beyond descriptions of Western case studies and expand the kinds of theories and methodologies used, as well as in what contexts these are applied. However, Niklasson and Towns 2022 introduces a special issue that focuses specifically on gender and Ministries of Foreign Affairs in Western as well as non-Western contexts. Studies on the adjacent field of gender in international negotiations appear to have suffered from the same limitations; Kray and Thompson 2004 shows that this research also revolves around different kinds of actors (negotiators) to a large extent. Kolb 2009 observes, however, that the focus has turned lately from individuals to the role of institutionlized social practices and their theoretical implications.
Aggestam, Karin, and Ann Towns. “The Gender Turn in Diplomacy: A New Research Agenda.” International Feminist Journal of Politics 21.1 (2019): 9–28.
DOI: 10.1080/14616742.2018.1483206
This paper states that research on gender and diplomacy needs to move beyond descriptions based on Western case studies. Instead, scholars should focus on systematic comparisons, as well as on ethnographic studies in order to build a dynamic research field that covers the development of gendered institutions over time, in addition to micro-processes of gender norms. The normative potential of international feminist theory in diplomatic studies is also stressed.
Kolb, Deborah M. “Too Bad for the Women or Does It Have to Be? Gender and Negotiation Research over the Past Twenty-Five Years.” Negotiation Journal 25.4 (2009): 515–531.
DOI: 10.1111/j.1571-9979.2009.00242.x
Relevant research is related to four research questions: Who comes to the table? What happens there? How do negotiations develop? What are the implications for theory and practice? Kolb concludes that the research field has developed in two ways: (1) a shift from an essentialist perspective on gender to a social constructivist one, and (2) focus has turned from individuals to the role of institutionlized social practices. Available online by subscription.
Kray, Laura J., and Leigh Thompson. “Gender Stereotypes and Negotiation Performance: An Examination of Theory and Research.” Research in Organizational Behavior 26 (2004): 103–182.
DOI: 10.1016/S0191-3085(04)26004-X
The research on gender and negotiation performance is summarized thematically according to five theoretical perspectives: focal negotiator, negotiating partner, negotiating dyad interaction, situation, and focal negotiator in combination with situation. The paper also lists the independent variables, behavioral and outcome measures, task characteristics, and major gender findings of 104 papers related to these perspectives through, for example, studies on prisoner’s dilemma-type games and behavioral negotiation tasks. Available online by subscription.
Niklasson, Birgitta, and Ann E. Towns. “Introduction: Approaching Gender and Ministries of Foreign Affairs.” The Hague Journal of Diplomacy 17 (2022): 339–369.
DOI: 10.1163/1871191x-bja10123
This paper introduces a special issue including eight case studies applying a gender perspective on ministries of foreign affairs. It also makes up a contribution in itself by analyzing the scholarship on gender and Ministries of Foreign Affairs (MFAs). The focus of previous research is divided it into three categories: 1) MFAs as gendered institutions, 2) gender and relations between domestic forces, and 3) gender and international relations of MFAs.
Towns, Ann E., Anne-Kathrin Kreft, and Birgitta Niklasson. “The Empowerment of Women in Diplomacy.” In Measuring Women’s Political Empowerment across the Globe: Strategies, Challenges and Future Research. Edited by Amy C. Alexander, Catherine Bolzendahl, and Farida Jalalzai, 187–205. Cham, Switzerland: Springer International, 2017.
This chapter divides the existing research on gender and diplomacy into three categories: those on diplomatic history, case studies of individual Ministries of Foreign Affairs (MFAs), and causal and theoretically driven comparative studies. The authors conclude that the research on gender and diplomacy needs to engage more in thick, theoretically driven descriptions and causal analyses of the institutional and cultural conditions that affect and are affected by women’s role in diplomacy.
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content on this page. Please subscribe or login.
How to Subscribe
Oxford Bibliographies Online is available by subscription and perpetual access to institutions. For more information or to contact an Oxford Sales Representative click here.
Article
- Academic Theories of International Relations Since 1945
- Africa, The Islamic State (ISIS/ISIL) in
- Alliances
- Al-Qaeda in the Islamic Maghreb
- Al-Shabaab
- Arab-Israeli Wars
- Arab-Israeli Wars, 1967-1973, The
- Armed Conflicts/Violence against Civilians Data Sets
- Arms Control
- Arms Races
- Arms Trade
- Asylum Policies
- Audience Costs and the Credibility of Commitments
- Authoritarian Regimes
- Balance of Power Theory
- Bargaining Theory of War
- Battle
- Boko Haram
- Brazilian Foreign Policy, The Politics of
- Canadian Foreign Policy
- Case Study Methods in International Relations
- Casualties and Politics
- Causation in International Relations
- Central Europe
- Challenge of Communism, The
- China and Japan
- China's Defense Policy
- China’s Foreign Policy
- Chinese Approaches to Strategy
- Cities and International Relations
- Civil Resistance
- Civil Society in the European Union
- Cold War, The
- Colonialism
- Comparative Foreign Policy Security Interests
- Comparative Regionalism
- Complex Systems Approaches to Global Politics
- Conflict Behavior and the Prevention of War
- Conflict Management
- Conflict Management in the Middle East
- Constructivism
- Contemporary Shia–Sunni Sectarian Violence
- Corruption
- Counterinsurgency
- Countermeasures in International Law
- Coups and Mutinies
- Criminal Law, International
- Crisis Bargaining
- Critical Theory of International Relations
- Cuban Missile Crisis, The
- Cultural Diplomacy
- Cyber Security
- Cyber Warfare
- Decision-Making, Poliheuristic Theory of
- Demobilization, Post World War I
- Democracies and World Order
- Democracy and Conflict
- Democracy in World Politics
- Deterrence Theory
- Development
- Diasporas
- Digital Diplomacy
- Diplomacy
- Diplomacy, Gender and
- Diplomacy, History of
- Diplomacy in the ASEAN
- Diplomacy, Public
- Disaster Diplomacy
- Diversionary Theory of War
- Drone Warfare
- Eastern Front (World War I)
- Economic Coercion and Sanctions
- Economics, International
- Embedded Liberalism
- Emerging Powers and BRICS
- Emotions
- Empirical Testing of Formal Models
- Energy and International Security
- Environmental Peacebuilding
- Epidemic Diseases and their Effects on History
- Ethics and Morality in International Relations
- Ethnicity in International Relations
- European Migration Policy
- European Security and Defense Policy, The
- European Union as an International Actor
- European Union, International Relations of the
- Experiments
- Face-to-Face Diplomacy
- Fascism, The Challenge of
- Feminist Methodologies in International Relations
- Feminist Security Studies
- Food Security
- Forecasting in International Relations
- Foreign Aid and Assistance
- Foreign Direct Investment
- Foreign Policy Decision-Making
- Foreign Policy of Non-democratic Regimes
- Foreign Policy of Saudi Arabia
- Foreign Policy, Theories of
- French Empire, 20th-Century
- From Club to Network Diplomacy
- Future of NATO
- Game Theory and Interstate Conflict
- Gender and Terrorism
- Gendering Disasters
- Gendering Forced Migration
- Genocide
- Genocide, Politicide, and Mass Atrocities Against Civilian...
- Genocides, 20th Century
- Geopolitics and Geostrategy
- Germany in World War II
- Global Citizenship
- Global Civil Society
- Global Constitutionalism
- Global Environmental Politics
- Global Ethic of Care
- Global Governance
- Global Justice, Western Perspectives
- Globalization
- Governance of the Arctic
- Grand Strategy
- Greater Middle East, The
- Greek Crisis
- Hague Conferences (1899, 1907)
- Hegemony
- Hezbollah
- Hierarchies in International Relations
- History and International Relations
- History of Brazilian Foreign Policy (1808 to 1945)
- Human Nature in International Relations
- Human Rights
- Human Rights and Humanitarian Diplomacy
- Human Rights, Feminism and
- Human Rights Law
- Human Security
- Hybrid Warfare
- Ideal Diplomat, The
- Idealism
- Identity and Foreign Policy
- Ideology, Values, and Foreign Policy
- Illicit Trade and Smuggling
- Imperialism
- Indian Foreign Policy
- Indian Perspectives on International Relations, War, and C...
- Indigenous Rights
- Industrialization
- Intelligence
- Intelligence Oversight
- Internal Displacement
- International Conflict Settlements, The Durability of
- International Criminal Court, The
- International Economic Organizations (IMF and World Bank)
- International Health Governance
- International Justice, Theories of
- International Law
- International Law, Feminist Perspectives on
- International Monetary Relations, History of
- International Negotiation and Conflict Resolution
- International Nongovernmental Organizations
- International Norms for Cultural Preservation and Cooperat...
- International Organizations
- International Relations, Aesthetic Turn in
- International Relations as a Social Science
- International Relations, Practice Turn in
- International Relations, Research Ethics in
- International Relations Theory
- International Security
- International Society
- International Society, Theorizing
- International Support For Nonstate Armed Groups
- Internet Law
- Interstate Cooperation Theory and International Institutio...
- Intervention and Use of Force
- Interviews and Focus Groups
- Iran, Politics and Foreign Policy
- Iraq: Past and Present
- Japanese Foreign Policy
- Jihadism
- Just War Theory
- Korean War
- Kurdistan and Kurdish Politics
- Law of the Sea
- Laws of War
- Leadership in International Affairs
- Leadership Personality Characteristics and Foreign Policy
- League of Nations
- Lean Forward and Pull Back Options for US Grand Strategy
- Liberalism
- Marxism
- Mediation and Civil Wars
- Mediation in International Conflicts
- Mediation via International Organizations
- Memory and World Politics
- Mercantilism
- Middle East, The Contemporary
- Middle East, The Contemporary
- Middle Powers and Regional Powers
- Military Science
- Minorities in the Middle East
- Minority Rights
- Morality in Foreign Policy
- Multilateralism (1992–), Return to
- National Liberation, International Law and Wars of
- National Security Act of 1947, The
- Nation-Building
- Nations and Nationalism
- NATO
- NATO, Europe, and Russia: Security Issues and the Border R...
- Natural Resources, Energy Politics, and Environmental Cons...
- Neorealism
- New Multilateralism in the Early 21st Century
- Nigeria
- Nonproliferation and Counterproliferation
- Nonviolent Resistance Datasets
- Normative Aspects of International Peacekeeping
- Normative Power Beyond the Eurocentric Frame
- Nuclear Proliferation
- Peace Education in Post-Conflict Zones
- Peace of Utrecht
- Peacebuilding, Post-Conflict
- Peacekeeping
- Piracy
- Political Demography
- Political Economy of National Security
- Political Extremism in Sub-Saharan Africa
- Political Learning and Socialization
- Political Psychology
- Politics and Islam in Turkey
- Politics and Nationalism in Cyprus
- Politics of Extraction: Theories and New Concepts for Crit...
- Politics of Resilience
- Popuism and Global Politics
- Popular Culture and International Relations
- Post-Civil War State
- Post-Conflict and Transitional Justice
- Post-Conflict Reconciliation in the Middle East and North ...
- Power Transition Theory
- Preventive War and Preemption
- Prisoners, Treatment of
- Private Military and Security Companies (PMSCs)
- Process Tracing Methods
- Pro-Government Militias
- Proliferation
- Prospect Theory in International Relations
- Psychoanalysis in Global Politics and International Relati...
- Psychology and Foreign Policy
- Public Opinion and Foreign Policy
- Public Opinion and the European Union
- Quantum Social Science
- Race and International Relations
- Realism
- Rebel Governance
- Reconciliation
- Reflexivity and International Relations
- Religion and International Relations
- Religiously Motivated Violence
- Reputation in International Relations
- Responsibility to Protect
- Rising Powers in World Politics
- Role Theory in International Relations
- Russian Foreign Policy
- Russian Revolutions and Civil War, 1917–1921
- Sanctions
- Sanctions in International Law
- Science Diplomacy
- Second Sino-Japanese War (1937-1945), The
- Secrecy and Diplomacy
- Securitization
- Self-Determination
- Shining Path
- Sinophone and Japanese International Relations Theory
- Small State Diplomacy
- Social Scientific Theories of Imperialism
- Sovereignty
- Soviet Union in World War II
- Space Strategy, Policy, and Power
- Spatial Dependencies and International Mediation
- State Theory in International Relations
- Statehood
- Status in International Relations
- Strategic Air Power
- Strategic and Net Assessments
- Sub-Saharan Africa, Conflict Formations in
- Sustainable Development
- Systems Theory
- Teaching International Relations
- Territorial Disputes
- Terrorism
- Terrorism and Poverty
- Terrorism, Geography of
- Terrorist Financing
- Terrorist Group Strategies
- The Changing Nature of Diplomacy
- The Politics and Diplomacy of Neutrality
- The Politics and Diplomacy of the First World War
- The Queer in/of International Relations
- the Twenty-First Century, Alliance Commitments in
- The Vienna Conventions on Diplomatic and Consular Relation...
- Theories of International Relations, Feminist
- Theory, Chinese International Relations
- Time Series Approaches to International Affairs
- Trade Law
- Transnational Actors
- Transnational Law
- Transnational Social Movements
- Tribunals, War Crimes and
- Trust and International Relations
- Turkey
- UN Security Council
- United Nations, The
- United States and Asia, The
- Uppsala Conflict Data Program
- US and Africa
- US–UK Special Relationship
- Venezuelan Politics and Foreign Policy
- Voluntary International Migration
- War
- War of the Spanish Succession (1701-1714)
- Weapons of Mass Destruction
- Western Balkans
- Western Front (World War I)
- Westphalia, Peace of (1648)
- Women and Peacemaking Peacekeeping
- World Economy 1919-1939
- World Polity School
- World War II Diplomacy and Political Relations
- World-System Theory