High-stakes Testing
- LAST REVIEWED: 21 April 2021
- LAST MODIFIED: 22 February 2018
- DOI: 10.1093/obo/9780199756810-0200
- LAST REVIEWED: 21 April 2021
- LAST MODIFIED: 22 February 2018
- DOI: 10.1093/obo/9780199756810-0200
Introduction
High-stakes testing in schools is based on the premise that student learning will increase if educators and students are held accountable for achievement. By definition, testing becomes high stakes when the outcomes are used to make decisions about promotion, admissions, graduation, and salaries. High-stakes testing is often associated with public reporting of testing results as a way to bring attention to the assessment results. For schools with high or improved performance on assessments, there are typically rewards (often monetary), and for schools that underperform, there are often penalties that can result in the replacement of administrators or teachers or retention of students at grade level. Research on high-stakes testing has found that test preparation can distort the results of the test and lead to invalid interpretations of learning gains. Policymakers have increased the use of high-stakes tests as a mechanism to rank and label schools, leading to public use of test scores as measures of desirable real estate and as indicators of school and instructional program quality. Proponents of high-stakes testing have maintained that the tests measure a consistent standard for all students regardless of their location, gender, ethnicity, or socioeconomic status. Advocates of testing maintain that the tests clearly identify what is to be learned and that by reporting scores, teachers and students will be more motivated to do well. Research on the impact of high-stakes testing has shown there are significant consequences that coincide with the implementation of assessment programs with significant stakes. Some of the consequences are positive (concrete standards, remediation programs, and attention given to low-achieving students) but others are negative and include a narrowed curriculum, instruction that focuses narrowly on what is assessed, cheating, and practicing for the tests. Other consequences of high-stakes testing programs include changes in student and teacher morale, and policies that disproportionately negatively impact minority students.
Historical and Contemporary Perspectives of High-Stakes Testing
High-stakes assessment programs are on the rise around the world (Lingard, et al. 2013; Smith 2014). A number of researchers have described the history and evolution of testing programs (Au 2011; Berliner 2011; Hamilton, et al. 2012; Lingard, et al. 2013; Smith 2014). Smith 2014 identified a shift from individual assessment (testing for advancement) toward testing for group accountability in the current literature. This has shifted the emphasis and responsibility from the individual student to learn and placed the emphasis on group assessment results that are the responsibility of teachers and schools. High-stakes testing movements have resulted in some schools being identified as low performing and in need of improvement, as identified by Cosner and Jones 2016. Studies have produced conflicting results as to whether high-stakes testing is improving student achievement, as identified by Phelps 2012, or not improving student achievement, as seen in Lee and Reeves 2012. One of the findings is that education is increasingly being run as a business (Au 2011; Lingard, et al. 2013; Smith 2014). This is partly due to the rise of international comparative exams (Lingard, et al. 2013; Smith 2014). There are several theories being applied to high-stakes testing. Au 2011 applied New Taylorism, which found that school decision making is top down, with administrators making the decisions and teachers losing autonomy. This leads to curriculum narrowing and an increase in didactic teaching methods. Berliner 2011 applied Campbell’s Law, which shows that as a societal gauge becomes too important, both the people using it and the indicator become corrupted. This leads to schools and teachers working the system trying to improve testing scores by cheating, removing students, or other means. When examining the global nature of testing, two theories appeared. The first, argued by Lingard, et al. 2013, is Global Panopticism, which focused on the global governance of education. The second, described by Smith 2014, is World Culture Theory, which argued that the globalization of accountability in countries such as the United States and the United Kingdom is a result of shared global values. World Culture Theory is a Western model that has been used to examine high-stakes testing and identifies factors such as academic intelligence, faith in science, decentralization, and neoliberalism as frames for understanding the testing movement.
Au, W. 2011. Teaching under the new Taylorism: High-stakes testing and the standardization of the 21st century curriculum. Journal of Curriculum Studies 43.1: 25–45.
DOI: 10.1080/00220272.2010.521261
This article gave an overview of teaching and discussed how high-stakes testing causes teachers to revert to historic teaching practices. On page 26, Au calls this “New Taylorism.” Taylorism focused on control from the manager level to organize workflows to high efficiency. In this system, education is driven only by objectives: teachers have no autonomy and administers determine the most efficient methods for producing students.
Berliner, D. 2011. Rational responses to high stakes testing: The case of curriculum narrowing and the harm that follows. Cambridge Journal of Education 41.3: 287–302.
DOI: 10.1080/0305764X.2011.607151
This article’s theoretical framework is Campbell’s Law: whenever a societal gauge becomes too important, both the people using it and the indicator become corrupted. This leads to schools and teachers attempting to improve testing scores by cheating, removing students, or other means. Additionally, there has been a narrowing of curriculum, a decrease in higher-order thinking, and an increase in instructional time for tested subjects; social studies and science have lost the most time.
Cosner, S., and M. F. Jones. 2016. Leading school-wide improvement in low-performing schools facing conditions of accountability: Key actions and considerations. Journal of Educational Administration 54.1: 41–57.
This literature review examined issues related to school improvement for low-performing schools. Recommendations included setting goals, developing a plan that is implemented and adjusted for achieving those goals, developing organizational teams to help with the planning and implementation of the goals, and helping their staff understand and commit to the goals. Administration must promote teacher learning and protect teachers from external demands so they can focus on teaching a coordinated curriculum.
Hamilton, L. S., B. M. Stecher, and K. Yuan. 2012. Standards-based accountability in the United States: Lessons learned and future directions. Education Inquiry 3.2: 149–170.
This article began with the history of standards-based accountability and then discussed the current findings. These included that high-stakes tests may increase teaching to the standards, as not all standards are covered in the tests. Teaching practice becomes distorted when there are strong repercussions associated with measurable outcomes. Responsibility may be moved in directions that conflict with the way schools are traditionally run. Being in alignment may reduce teacher autonomy. The authors gave suggestions for improving the system.
Lee, J., and T. Reeves. 2012. Revisiting the impact of NCLB high-stakes school accountability, capacity, and resources: State NAEP 1990–2009 reading and math achievement gaps and trends. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis 34.2: 209–231.
This study used hierarchical linear modeling to examine gains in scores as a result of No Child Left Behind. It found mixed patterns related to improving math and reading scores in the United States. The rate of improvement for reading was the same before and after implementation of NCLB, but math scores improved more quickly after the implementation of NCLB. However, the differences for both were small.
Lingard, B., W. Martino, and G. Rezai-Rashti. 2013. Testing regimes, accountabilities and education policy: Commensurate global and national developments. Journal of Education Policy 28.5: 539–556.
DOI: 10.1080/02680939.2013.820042
This article gave an introductory overview of the rise of testing around the world. The authors believe that the rise of global testing (ex: PISA, TIMSS) has led to global governance of national education, Global Panopticism. It has globalized educational comparisons and used it as a mode of governing schools. This process has changed not only the way education is organized but also the notion of what it means to be educated or to learn.
Phelps, R. P. 2012. The effect of testing on student achievement, 1910–2010. International Journal of Testing 12.1: 21–43.
DOI: 10.1080/15305058.2011.602920
This literature review examined student achievement and standardized testing. It found evidence that testing has increased student achievement. Based on the quantitative studies, the effects were moderately to strongly positive. For the qualitative studies, they were very strongly positive. The authors argue that the findings support testing that holds teachers and students accountable for their performance.
Smith, W. C. 2014. The global transformation toward testing for accountability. In Special issue: The comparative and international history of school accountability and testing. Edited by S. Dorn and C. Ydesen. Education Policy Analysis Archives 22.116: 1–34.
It is important to differentiate between tests that have high stakes for students and those that have high stakes for teachers, as they have different effects on motivation. Changing who is held responsible has moved the focus from low-performing students to low-performing schools. The rise of accountability testing in the United States and the United Kingdom has pushed for globalization of accountability testing due to shared global values (World Culture Theory).
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content on this page. Please subscribe or login.
How to Subscribe
Oxford Bibliographies Online is available by subscription and perpetual access to institutions. For more information or to contact an Oxford Sales Representative click here.
Article
- Academic Achievement
- Academic Audit for Universities
- Academic Freedom and Tenure in the United States
- Action Research in Education
- Adjuncts in Higher Education in the United States
- Administrator Preparation
- Adolescence
- Advanced Placement and International Baccalaureate Courses
- Advocacy and Activism in Early Childhood
- African American Racial Identity and Learning
- Alaska Native Education
- Alternative Certification Programs for Educators
- Alternative Schools
- American Indian Education
- Art Education
- Artificial Intelligence and Learning
- Assessing School Leader Effectiveness
- Assessment, Behavioral
- Assessment, Educational
- Assessment in Early Childhood Education
- Assistive Technology
- Augmented Reality in Education
- Beginning-Teacher Induction
- Bilingual Education and Bilingualism
- Blended Learning
- Bullying
- Case Study in Education Research
- Changing Professional and Academic Identities
- Character Education
- Children’s and Young Adult Literature
- Children's Beliefs about Intelligence
- Children's Rights in Early Childhood Education
- Citizenship Education
- Civic and Social Engagement of Higher Education
- Classroom Learning Environments: Assessing and Investigati...
- Classroom Management
- Coherent Instructional Systems at the School and School Sy...
- College Admissions in the United States
- College Athletics in the United States
- Community Relations
- Comparative Education
- Computer-Based Testing
- Conceptualizing, Measuring, and Evaluating Improvement Net...
- Continuous Improvement and "High Leverage" Educational Pro...
- Counseling in Schools
- Creativity
- Critical Perspectives on Educational Innovation and Improv...
- Critical Race Theory
- Crossborder and Transnational Higher Education
- Cross-National Research on Continuous Improvement
- Cross-Sector Research on Continuous Learning and Improveme...
- Cultural Diversity in Early Childhood Education
- Culturally Responsive Leadership
- Culturally Responsive Pedagogies
- Culturally Responsive Teacher Education in the United Stat...
- Curriculum Design
- Data Collection in Educational Research
- Data-driven Decision Making in the United States
- Deaf Education
- Desegregation and Integration
- Design Thinking and the Learning Sciences: Theoretical, Pr...
- Development, Moral
- Dialogic Pedagogy
- Digital Age Teacher, The
- Digital Citizenship
- Digital Divides
- Disabilities
- Distance Learning
- Distributed Leadership
- Doctoral Education and Training
- Early Childhood Education and Care (ECEC) in Denmark
- Early Childhood Education and Development in Mexico
- Early Childhood Education in Aotearoa New Zealand
- Early Childhood Education in Australia
- Early Childhood Education in China
- Early Childhood Education in Europe
- Early Childhood Education in Sub-Saharan Africa
- Early Childhood Education in Sweden
- Early Childhood Education Pedagogy
- Early Childhood Education Policy
- Early Childhood Education, The Arts in
- Early Childhood Mathematics
- Early Childhood Science
- Early Childhood Teacher Education
- Early Childhood Teachers in Aotearoa New Zealand
- Early Years Professionalism and Professionalization Polici...
- Economics of Education
- Education For Children with Autism
- Education for Sustainable Development
- Education Leadership, Empirical Perspectives in
- Education of Native Hawaiian Students
- Education Reform and School Change
- Educational Statistics for Longitudinal Research
- Educator Partnerships with Parents and Families with a Foc...
- Emotional and Behavioral Disorders
- Epistemic Beliefs
- Equity and Improvement: Engaging Communities in Educationa...
- Equity, Ethnicity, Diversity, and Excellence in Education
- Ethical Research with Young Children
- Ethics and Education
- Ethics of Teaching
- Ethnic Studies
- Evidence-Based Communication Assessment and Intervention
- Family and Community Partnerships in Education
- Family Day Care
- Federal Government Programs and Issues
- Finance, Education
- Financial Aid
- Formative Assessment
- Future-Focused Education
- Gender and Achievement
- Gender and Alternative Education
- Gifted Education
- Global Mindedness and Global Citizenship Education
- Global University Rankings
- Governance, Education
- Grounded Theory
- Growth of Effective Mental Health Services in Schools in t...
- Higher Education and Globalization
- Higher Education and the Developing World
- Higher Education Faculty Characteristics and Trends in the...
- Higher Education Finance
- Higher Education Governance
- Higher Education Graduate Outcomes and Destinations
- Higher Education in Africa
- Higher Education in China
- Higher Education in Latin America
- Higher Education in the United States, Historical Evolutio...
- Higher Education, International Issues in
- Higher Education Management
- Higher Education Policy
- Higher Education Research
- Higher Education Student Assessment
- High-stakes Testing
- History of Early Childhood Education in the United States
- History of Education in the United States
- History of Technology Integration in Education
- Homeschooling
- Inclusion in Early Childhood: Difference, Disability, and ...
- Inclusive Education
- Indigenous Education in a Global Context
- Indigenous Learning Environments
- Indigenous Students in Higher Education in the United Stat...
- Infant and Toddler Pedagogy
- Inservice Teacher Education
- Integrating Art across the Curriculum
- Intelligence
- Intensive Interventions for Children and Adolescents with ...
- International Perspectives on Academic Freedom
- Intersectionality and Education
- Knowledge Development in Early Childhood
- Leadership Development, Coaching and Feedback for
- Leadership in Early Childhood Education
- Leadership Training with an Emphasis on the United States
- Learning Analytics in Higher Education
- Learning Difficulties
- Learning, Lifelong
- Learning, Multimedia
- Learning Strategies
- Legal Matters and Education Law
- LGBT Youth in Schools
- Linguistic Diversity
- Linguistically Inclusive Pedagogy
- Literacy
- Literacy Development and Language Acquisition
- Literature Reviews
- Mathematics Instruction and Interventions for Students wit...
- Mathematics Teacher Education
- Measurement for Improvement in Education
- Measurement in Education in the United States
- Meta-Analysis and Research Synthesis in Education
- Methodological Approaches for Impact Evaluation in Educati...
- Methodologies for Conducting Education Research
- Mindfulness, Learning, and Education
- Mixed Methods Research
- Motivation
- Multiliteracies in Early Childhood Education
- Multiple Documents Literacy: Theory, Research, and Applica...
- Multivariate Research Methodology
- Museums, Education, and Curriculum
- Music Education
- Narrative Research in Education
- Native American Studies
- Note-Taking
- Numeracy Education
- One-to-One Technology in the K-12 Classroom
- Online Education
- Open Education
- Organizing for Continuous Improvement in Education
- Organizing Schools for the Inclusion of Students with Disa...
- Outdoor Play and Learning
- Outdoor Play and Learning in Early Childhood Education
- Pedagogical Leadership
- Pedagogy of Teacher Education, A
- Performance Objectives and Measurement
- Performance-based Research Assessment in Higher Education
- Performance-based Research Funding
- Phenomenology in Educational Research
- Philosophy of Education
- Physical Education
- Play
- Podcasts in Education
- Policy
- Policy Context of United States Educational Innovation and...
- Politics of Education
- Portable Technology Use in Special Education Programs and ...
- Pre-Service Teacher Education
- Problem Solving
- Productivity and Higher Education
- Professional Development
- Professional Learning Communities
- Program Evaluation
- Programs and Services for Students with Emotional or Behav...
- Psychology Learning and Teaching
- Psychometric Issues in the Assessment of English Language ...
- Qualitative Data Analysis Techniques
- Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Research Samp...
- Qualitative Research Design
- Quantitative Research Designs in Educational Research
- Race and Affirmative Action in Higher Education
- Reading Education
- Refugee and New Immigrant Learners
- Relational and Developmental Trauma and Schools
- Reliability in Educational Assessments
- Religion in Elementary and Secondary Education in the Unit...
- Researcher Development and Skills Training within the Cont...
- Research-Practice Partnerships in Education within the Uni...
- Response to Intervention
- Restorative Practices
- Scale and Sustainability of Education Innovation and Impro...
- Scaling Up Research-based Educational Practices
- School Accreditation
- School Choice
- School Culture
- School District Budgeting and Financial Management in the ...
- School Improvement through Inclusive Education
- School Reform
- Schools, Private and Independent
- School-Wide Positive Behavior Support
- Science Education
- Secondary to Postsecondary Transition Issues
- Self-Regulated Learning
- Self-Study of Teacher Education Practices
- Service-Learning
- Severe Disabilities
- Single Salary Schedule
- Single-sex Education
- Single-Subject Research Design
- Social Context of Education
- Social Justice
- Social Network Analysis
- Social Pedagogy
- Social Science and Education Research
- Social Studies Education
- Sociology of Education
- Standards-Based Education
- Statistical Assumptions
- Student Access, Equity, and Diversity in Higher Education
- Student Assignment Policy
- Student Engagement in Tertiary Education
- Student Learning, Development, Engagement, and Motivation ...
- Student Participation
- Student Voice in Teacher Development
- Sustainability Education in Early Childhood Education
- Sustainability in Early Childhood Education
- Sustainability in Higher Education
- Teacher Beliefs and Epistemologies
- Teacher Collaboration in School Improvement
- Teacher Evaluation and Teacher Effectiveness
- Teacher Preparation
- Teacher Training and Development
- Teacher Unions and Associations
- Teacher-Student Relationships
- Teaching Critical Thinking
- Technologies, Teaching, and Learning in Higher Education
- Technology Education in Early Childhood
- Technology, Educational
- Technology-based Assessment
- The Bologna Process
- The Regulation of Standards in Higher Education
- Theories of Educational Leadership
- Three Conceptions of Literacy: Media, Narrative, and Gamin...
- Tracking and Detracking
- Traditions of Quality Improvement in Education
- Transformative Learning
- Transitions in Early Childhood Education
- Tribally Controlled Colleges and Universities in the Unite...
- Understanding the Psycho-Social Dimensions of Schools and ...
- University Faculty Roles and Responsibilities in the Unite...
- Using Ethnography in Educational Research
- Value of Higher Education for Students and Other Stakehold...
- Virtual Learning Environments
- Vocational and Technical Education
- Wellness and Well-Being in Education
- Women's and Gender Studies
- Young Children and Spirituality
- Young Children's Learning Dispositions
- Young Children's Working Theories