Image Repair Theory
- LAST REVIEWED: 16 February 2018
- LAST MODIFIED: 15 January 2019
- DOI: 10.1093/obo/9780199756841-0103
- LAST REVIEWED: 16 February 2018
- LAST MODIFIED: 15 January 2019
- DOI: 10.1093/obo/9780199756841-0103
Introduction
Crisis communication has emerged as an important area for theory and research in communication. Image repair, along with communication about disasters and terrorism, is a component of crisis communication. “Image” refers to reputation or face. Image is composed of perceptions about us held by others (relevant audiences). Our image is influenced by things we say and do, by what others say about us, and how others behave toward us. Of course, an image is based on beliefs and values (attitudes) as well as current statements and deeds. Image is important to people because threats to image often create embarrassment, which is unpleasant. Image is also quite important to both people and organizations (including corporations, universities, and governments) because reputation affects how others treat them. When we believe (have perceptions) that others accuse or suspect us of wrong-doing, a threat to our image arises. Note that these beliefs (about what others think about us) are a second layer of perceptions. Image repair can come into play when we hold the perception that others have negative perceptions of us. A source’s credibility (image) is an important factor in persuasion: we are more likely to be persuaded by those with high credibility and less likely to be persuaded by those with low credibility. This means that at times when it is particularly important to be persuasive—such as when we are dealing with threats to image—the accusations or suspicions that prompt image repair can reduce the effectiveness of our defensive messages.
Key Texts
As conceptualized in the important early article Ware and Linkugel 1973, this genre does not include apology (i.e., admission of wrong-doing, expression of regret, request for forgiveness) as an option. Kenneth Burke, a literary theorist and critic who is very influential in rhetorical circles, argues in Burke 1970 that society is composed of hierarchies and human nature means we inevitably violate societal norms. These violations produce guilt, which prompts messages in order to achieve redemption. Burke identified two options for dealing with guilt: victimage (shifting blame) and mortification (confessing and asking for forgiveness). Scott and Lyman 1968 was written by sociologists who discussed “accounts,” which are explanations for untoward behavior. Scott and Lyman divide accounts into excuses and justifications. Benoit, et al. 1991, relying primarily on these three sources, articulates an early version of image repair theory (referred to initially as image restoration theory). Pomerantz 1978 explains that complaints have two elements: blame and offensiveness. Benoit 2015 updates the theory of image repair, which takes its cue from the attacks or suspicions that prompt image repair messages. It also relates the concepts of blame and offensiveness to beliefs and values in the theory of reasoned action, and discusses image repair discourse in several contexts. Image repair theory identifies five general approaches (and fourteen total strategies) for responding to accusations or suspicions: denial and evading responsibility address blame; reducing offensiveness concerns offensiveness; and mortification and corrective action attempt to repair an image without directly dealing with blame or offensiveness.
Benoit, William L. 2015. Accounts, excuses, and apologies: Image repair theory and research. 2d ed. Albany: State Univ. of New York Press.
This book updates theory and research on image repair. It relates image repair to Fishbein and Ajzen’s concepts of beliefs (blame) and values (offensiveness). This book looks at image repair in several contexts: political, corporate, sports/entertainment, international, and third-party (when one person or organization attempts to repair the image of another). New case studies of image repair on each topic are discussed.
Benoit, William L., Paul Gullifor, and Daniel A. Panici. 1991. President Reagan’s defensive discourse on the Iran-Contra affair. Communication Studies 42:272–294.
DOI: 10.1080/10510979109368342
This article provided the initial presentation of image restoration theory, applying it to multiple messages from President Ronald Reagan on the Iran-Contra affair. His defense was not particularly effective. When the Tower Commission Report was published he was forced to shift to mortification and corrective action and his image began to improve.
Burke, Kenneth. 1970. Rhetoric of religion. Berkeley: Univ. of California Press.
This book addresses ways of dealing with guilt so as to achieve redemption. It argues that society inherently possesses a hierarchy or set of norms. Human beings inevitably violate these norms, giving rise to guilt. In order to achieve redemption, people have two options: victimage (shifting blame to a scapegoat) and mortification (confessing to wrong-doing and begging forgiveness).
Pomerantz, Anita. 1978. Attributions of responsibility: Blamings. Sociology 12:115–121.
DOI: 10.1177/003803857801200107
This article identifies the two key components of a complaint: blame (responsibility) and offensiveness. For an image to be at risk, both elements must be present. If I did something (blame) but what I did is inoffensive, my face is not threatened. Similarly, if an offensive act occurred but I had nothing to do with it (no blame), my reputation is not at risk.
Scott, Marvin B., and Stanford M. Lyman. 1968. Accounts. American Sociological Review 33:46–62.
DOI: 10.2307/2092239
This article discusses two approaches to dealing with unfavorable evaluations. Excuses attempt to reduce blame for an offensive act. Justifications try to neutralize the unfavorable evaluation of an action.
Ware, B. L., and Wil A. Linkugel. 1973. They spoke in defense of themselves: On the generic criticism of apologia. Quarterly Journal of Speech 59:273–283.
DOI: 10.1080/00335637309383176
Articulates a genre of speeches of self-defense. One accused of wrong-doing has four responses: denial, bolstering, differentiation, and transcendence. They also identify four postures or combination defenses: absolutive (denial and differentiation), vindicative (denial and transcendence), explanative (bolstering and differentiation), and justificative (bolstering and transcendence).
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content on this page. Please subscribe or login.
How to Subscribe
Oxford Bibliographies Online is available by subscription and perpetual access to institutions. For more information or to contact an Oxford Sales Representative click here.
Article
- Acculturation Processes and Communication
- Action Assembly Theory
- Action-Implicative Discourse Analysis
- Activist Media
- Adherence and Communication
- Adolescence and the Media
- Advertisements, Televised Political
- Advertising
- Advertising, Children and
- Advertising, International
- Advocacy Journalism
- Agenda Setting
- Annenberg, Walter H.
- Applied Communication Research Methods
- Argumentation
- Attitude-Behavior Consistency
- Audience Fragmentation
- Audience Studies
- Bakhtin, Mikhail
- Bandwagon Effect
- Baudrillard, Jean
- Blockchain and Communication
- Bourdieu, Pierre
- Brand Equity
- British and Irish Magazine, History of the
- Broadcasting, Public Service
- Capture, Media
- Castells, Manuel
- Celebrity and Public Persona
- Censorship
- Civic Duty
- Civil Rights Movement and the Media, The
- CNN
- Co-Cultural Theory and Communication
- Codes and Cultural Discourse Analysis
- Cognitive Dissonance
- Collective Memory, Communication and
- Comedic News
- Communication Apprehension
- Communication Campaigns
- Communication, Definitions and Concepts of
- Communication History
- Communication Law
- Communication Management
- Communication Networks
- Communication, Philosophy of
- Community Attachment
- Community Structure Approach
- Computational Journalism
- Computer-Mediated Communication
- Content Analysis
- Corporate Social Responsibility and Communication
- Crisis Communication
- Critical and Cultural Studies
- Cross-tools and Cross-media Effects
- Cultivation
- Cultural and Creative Industries
- Cultural Imperialism Theories
- Cultural Mapping
- Cultural Persuadables
- Cultural Pluralism and Communication
- Cyberpolitics
- 3D Media
- Death, Dying, and Communication
- Debates, Televised
- Deliberation
- Developmental Communication
- Diffusion of Innovations
- Digital Divide
- Digital Intimacies
- Digital Literacy
- Diplomacy, Public
- Distributed Work, Comunication and
- Documentary and Communication
- E-democracy/E-participation
- E-Government
- Elaboration Likelihood Model
- Electronic Word-of-Mouth (eWOM)
- Embedded Coverage
- Entertainment
- Entertainment-Education
- Environmental Communication
- Ethnography of Communication
- Experiments
- Family Communication
- Federal Communications Commission
- Feminist and Queer Game Studies
- Feminist Data Studies
- Feminist Journalism
- Feminist Theory
- Focus Groups
- Food Studies and Communication
- Freedom of the Press
- Gatekeeping
- Gender and the Media
- Global Englishes
- Global Media, History of
- Global Media Organizations
- Glocalization
- Goffman, Erving
- Habermas, Jürgen
- Habituation and Communication
- Health Communication
- Hegemony
- Hermeneutic Communication Studies
- Heuristics
- Homelessness and Communication
- Hook-Up and Dating Apps
- Hostile Media Effect
- Identification with Media Characters
- Identity, Cultural
- Image Repair Theory
- Implicit Measurement
- Impression Management
- Indexing
- Infographics
- Information and Communication Technology for Development
- Information Management
- Information Overload
- Information Processing
- Infotainment
- Innis, Harold
- Instructional Communication
- Integrated Marketing Communications
- Interactivity
- Intercultural Capital
- Intercultural Communication
- Intercultural Communication, Tourism and
- Intercultural Communication, Worldview in
- Intercultural Conflict Mediation
- Intercultural New Media
- Intergenerational Communication
- Intergroup Communication
- International Communications
- Interpersonal Communication
- Interpersonal LGBTQ Communication
- Interpretation/Reception
- Interpretive Communities
- Journalism
- Journalism, Alternative
- Journalism and Trauma
- Journalism, Citizen
- Journalism, Citizen, History of
- Journalism Ethics
- Journalism, Interpretive
- Journalism, Peace
- Journalism, Tabloid
- Journalists, Violence against
- Knowledge Gap
- Lazarsfeld, Paul
- Mass Communication
- McLuhan, Marshall
- Media Activism
- Media Aesthetics
- Media and Time
- Media Bias
- Media Convergence
- Media Credibility
- Media Dependency
- Media Ecology
- Media Economics
- Media Economics, Theories of
- Media, Educational
- Media Effects
- Media Ethics
- Media Events
- Media Exposure Measurement
- Media, Gays and Lesbians in the
- Media Literacy
- Media Logic
- Media Management
- Media Policy and Governance
- Media Regulation
- Media, Social
- Media Sociology
- Media Systems Theory
- Merton, Robert K.
- Message Characteristics and Persuasion
- Mobile Communication Studies
- Muckraking
- Multimodal Discourse Analysis, Approaches to
- Multinational Organizations, Communication and Culture in
- Murdoch, Rupert
- Narrative
- Narrative Engagement
- Narrative Persuasion
- News, Fake
- News Framing
- News Media Coverage of Women
- NGOs, Communication and
- Online Campaigning
- Open Access
- Organizational Change and Organizational Change Communicat...
- Organizational Communication
- Organizational Communication, Aging and
- Parasocial Theory in Communication
- Participation, Civic/Political
- Participatory Action Research
- Patient-Provider Communication
- Peacebuilding and Communication
- Perceived Realism
- Personalized Communication
- Persuasion and Social Influence
- Persuasion, Resisting
- Photojournalism
- Political Advertising
- Political Communication, Normative Analysis of
- Political Economy
- Political Knowledge
- Political Marketing
- Political Scandals
- Political Socialization
- Polls, Opinion
- Priming
- Product Placement
- Propaganda
- Proxemics
- Public Opinion
- Public Relations
- Public Sphere
- Queer Intercultural Communication
- Queer Migration and Digital Media
- Racism and Communication
- Radio Studies
- Reality Television
- Reasoned Action Frameworks
- Religion and the Media
- Reporting, Investigative
- Rhetoric and Communication
- Rhetoric and Intercultural Communication
- Rhetoric, Religious
- Rhetoric, Visual
- Risk Communication
- Rumor and Communication
- Schramm, Wilbur
- Science Communication
- Scripps, E. W.
- Selective Exposure
- Semiotics
- Sense-Making/Sensemaking
- Sesame Street
- Sex in the Media
- Small-Group Communication
- Social Capital
- Social Change
- Social Cognition
- Social Construction
- Social Identity Theory and Communication
- Social Interaction
- Social Movements
- Social Network Analysis
- Social Protest
- Sports Communication
- Stereotypes
- Strategic Communication
- Surveillance and Communication
- Symbolic Interactionism in Communication
- Synchrony in Intercultural Communication
- Tabloidization
- Telecommunications History/Policy
- Television
- Television, Cable
- Textual Analysis and Communication
- Third Culture Kids
- Third-Person Effect
- Time Warner
- Transgender Media Studies
- Transmedia Storytelling
- Two-Step Flow
- Uses and Gratifications
- Video
- Video Deficit
- Video Games and Communication
- Violence in the Media
- Virtual Reality and Communication
- Visual Communication
- Web 2.0
- Web Archiving
- Webcare
- Whistleblowing
- Whiteness Theory in Intercultural Communication
- WikiLeaks
- Youth and Media
- Zines and Communication