Sure Start
- LAST REVIEWED: 28 April 2017
- LAST MODIFIED: 28 June 2016
- DOI: 10.1093/obo/9780199791231-0172
- LAST REVIEWED: 28 April 2017
- LAST MODIFIED: 28 June 2016
- DOI: 10.1093/obo/9780199791231-0172
Introduction
Sure Start Local Programs (SSLPs) was one of the flagship policies of the 1997 UK Labour government, committed to reducing inequalities and the impact of disadvantage on children. After the government reviewed evidence and initiatives in the United States, the decision was to focus on early childhood, but no single program was recommended. Instead, a set of conditions for a service were proposed: a focus that was two-generational; non-stigmatizing, multifaceted (i.e., not only health, or education or parent support), locally managed, and culturally appropriate. The programs would be created in the 20 percent most deprived communities and be area based (i.e., services open to all residents of defined areas). Local control was a key principle, with money going directly from central government to local multiagency partnership boards, bypassing local authorities. Partnership boards had to be multiagency and also include local parents and other community members. Thus the ethos was “bottom up” and flexible so that local needs could be addressed. The government’s intention was a ring-fenced (protected, not for any other use) budget (roughly equivalent to £1,250 per annum for each child under four in the area) for ten years. In 1999 a total of £542 million was made available for the next three years. In England 250 SSLPs were planned, each to provide for approximately 800 children under four. Any local group in the identified deprived areas could apply for funding. Guidance was that, following the principles described in this section, the SSLPs should provide support for parents; outreach and home visiting; primary and community health care; support for good quality play, learning, and childcare; and support for people with special needs. Spending between these services and the manner in which they were provided was decided locally. There was a slow start, with only fifty-nine programs approved by 2000, but then fast expansion followed, with funding doubled to be able to support 500 in England by 2003–2004. However, the initiative was not universally welcomed, given that there was no clear blueprint for how a SSLP should operate. At the same time as the expansion, an ambitious national evaluation was funded, but the great diversity among SSLPs posed a particular set of challenges for the researchers. However, in 2005 the policy changed from Sure Start Local Programs to Sure Start Children’s Centres (CCs), which were not area based, with funding going from central government to local authorities rather than directly to the centres, and available as a mainstream service to all residents, although with less generous funding and not ring-fenced. Thus Sure Start is a somewhat elusive concept, illustrated by the research in this article.
The Features of Sure Start Local Programs
SSLPs were a political, not scientific, invention. Local organizations applied for the generous funding but with no clear idea about what should be provided, or how objectives and targets could be achieved. Norman Glass was the Treasury official given the task of working out how to reduce the impact of disadvantage on children; he in essence created the concept of SSLPs and sets out his vision clearly in Glass 1999. Helen Roberts was not connected with the program’s management but writes in Roberts 2000 as one trying to make sense of how Glass’s vision should be carried out in practice. Naomi Eisenstadt was appointed to direct the initiative. and Eisenstadt 2002 sets out her vision for what it would mean in practice. Eisenstadt 2011 gives even more details about what the initiative hoped to achieve, presenting a rich account of the challenges—political, practical, theoretical, financial—that she encountered over the time of her stewardship of SSLPs from its inception in 2000 until 2008. Eisenstadt 2011 is essential reading for anyone trying to understand the birth, growth, and more recent decline of Sure Start, which is covered in more detail in Moving Forward: Transformation from SSLPs to (Sure Start) Children’s Centres, the final section of this bibliography. Given the political origins of SSLPs, brainchild of a Treasury official rather than child development experts or service delivery professionals, there has been debate about how SSLPs should be managed and what they should offer. Clarke 2006 raises the notion that the debate risked sliding into a moral discourse of social exclusion, blaming parents for poor outcomes. Anning and Hall 2008 analyzes the progress of children’s services, highlighting both the need for joined-up working and for evidence-based practice. Both were intended to be part of SSLPs, though the latter was not clearly achieved. Melhuish and Hall 2007 recaps the policy background of SSLPs and identifies ways that the program should benefit children by integrating health and social care. In addition to the national evaluation, each local program was required to spend 5 percent of its budget on local evaluation work. Bagley, et al. 2004 is one of these evaluations. Following a detailed account of the government’s social exclusion agenda, the authors of Bagley, et al. 2004 focus on the research they conducted, specifically on one of the key aspects of SSLPs, the requirement for interagency working. They provide findings from semi-structured interviews with thirty-two members of an interdisciplinary team delivering the program with illuminating quotations, interpreted within a social capital framework.
Anning, Angela, and David Hall. “What Was Sure Start and Why Did It Matter?” In Improving Services for Young Children: From Sure Start to Children’s Centres. Edited by Angela Anning and Mog Ball, 3–15. London: SAGE, 2008.
Good description of the politics behind SSLPs, other initiatives and legislation directed at young children, and reasons for the focus on coordination of cross-government departments. Child protection was a particular issue that SSLPs hoped to improve through liaison between social services and other agencies.
Bagley, Carl, Clare L. Ackerley, and Julie Rattray. “Documents and Debates Social Exclusion, Sure Start and Organizational Social Capital: Evaluating Inter‐Disciplinary Multi‐Agency Working in an Education and Health Work Programme.” Journal of Education Policy 19 (2004): 595–607.
DOI: 10.1080/0268093042000269162
Documents and debates social exclusion, Sure Start, and joined-up working: evaluating interdisciplinary multiagencies working in an education and health work program. Presents findings from interviews with teams delivering the program and analysis of program attendance, conducted as part of a local evaluation, outlining difficulties and how they were overcome.
Clarke, Karen. “Childhood, Parenting and Early Intervention: A Critical Examination of the Sure Start National Programme.” Critical Social Policy 26 (2006): 699–721.
Sets Sure Start in the context of previous policies, social exclusion theory, and the contradictions in New Labour’s social policy attempting to eradicate child poverty. Provides substantial background context, describing how education became the most influential government department, with a focus on early education and parenting skills.
Eisenstadt, Naomi. “Sure Start: Key Principles and Ethos.” Child: Care, Health and Development 28 (2002): 3–4.
DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2214.2002.00249.x
By the director of the central government Sure Start Unit, repeats key principles but with more practical detail, e.g., the importance of agencies sharing information. Issues surrounding ways to provide access to the hard to reach are discussed, while programs still retainthe area-based, “open to all” ethos. The importance of addressing local needs is highlighted.
Eisenstadt, Naomi. Providing a Sure Star: How Government Discovered Early Childhood. Bristol, UK: Policy Press, 2011.
DOI: 10.1332/policypress/9781847427304.001.0001
After being in overall charge of Sure Start, the author provides an insider’s view about more than a decade of the program’s development and evolution. Full details of the program from its earliest days, with fascinating insights into the way the different agendas of politicians, academics, and managers of children’s services were faced.
Glass, Norman. “Sure Start: The Development of an Early Intervention Programme for Young Children in the United Kingdom.” Children & Society 13 (1999): 257–264.
DOI: 10.1002/chi569
By the prime mover who developed the concept of Sure Start, gives details of the origins of Sure Start, the “joined-up government” policy behind SSLPs, and various meetings held to refine the ideas. Sets out in detail the aims of the program, details other “area-based” initiatives, and describes the evaluation strategy.
Melhuish, Edward, and David Hall. “The Policy Background to Sure Start.” In The National Evaluation of Sure Start: Does Area-Based Early Intervention Work? Edited by Jay Belsky, Jacqueline Barnes, and Edward Melhuish, 3–21. Bristol, UK: Policy Press, 2007.
DOI: 10.1332/policypress/9781861349507.003.0001
Detailed summary of the government processes that led to SSLPs, with a particular focus on early intervention as it relates to child health. Critiques the concept of local control over program content. Documents the early stages of the program and how central government policyinteracted with the national evaluation.
Roberts, Helen. “What Is Sure Start?” Archives of Disease in Childhood 82 (2000): 435–437.
DOI: 10.1136/adc.82.6.435
Reiterates much of the detail in Glass 1999, but with a more critical outsider’s eye. Questions the idea of working at the local-area level, points out that many disadvantaged children will be overlooked questions the specific targets assigned to the overarching objectives, but overall supports the idea of SSLPs.
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content on this page. Please subscribe or login.
How to Subscribe
Oxford Bibliographies Online is available by subscription and perpetual access to institutions. For more information or to contact an Oxford Sales Representative click here.
Article
- Abduction of Children
- Aboriginal Childhoods
- Addams, Jane
- ADHD, Sociological Perspectives on
- Adolescence and Youth
- Adolescent Consent to Medical Treatment
- Adoption and Fostering
- Adoption and Fostering, History of Cross-Country
- Adoption and Fostering in Canada, History of
- Advertising and Marketing, Psychological Approaches to
- Advertising and Marketing, Sociocultural Approaches to
- Africa, Children and Young People in
- African American Children and Childhood
- After-school Hours and Activities
- Aggression across the Lifespan
- Ancient Near and Middle East, Child Sacrifice in the
- Animals, Children and
- Animations, Comic Books, and Manga
- Anthropology of Childhood
- Archaeology of Childhood
- Ariès, Philippe
- Attachment in Children and Adolescents
- Australia, History of Adoption and Fostering in
- Australian Indigenous Contexts and Childhood Experiences
- Autism, Females and
- Autism, Medical Model Perspectives on
- Autobiography and Childhood
- Benjamin, Walter
- Bereavement
- Best Interest of the Child
- Bioarchaeology of Childhood
- Body, Children and the
- Body Image
- Bourdieu, Pierre
- Boy Scouts/Girl Guides
- Boys and Fatherhood
- Breastfeeding
- Bronfenbrenner, Urie
- Bruner, Jerome
- Buddhist Views of Childhood
- Byzantine Childhoods
- Child and Adolescent Anger
- Child Beauty Pageants
- Child Homelessness
- Child Mortality, Historical Perspectives on Infant and
- Child Protection
- Child Protection, Children, Neoliberalism, and
- Child Public Health
- Child Trafficking and Slavery
- Childcare Manuals
- Childhood and Borders
- Childhood and Empire
- Childhood as Discourse
- Childhood, Confucian Views of Children and
- Childhood, Memory and
- Childhood Studies and Leisure Studies
- Childhood Studies in France
- Childhood Studies, Interdisciplinarity in
- Childhood Studies, Posthumanism and
- Childhoods in the United States, Sports and
- Childism
- Children and Dance
- Children and Film-Making
- Children and Money
- Children and Social Media
- Children and Sport
- Children and Sustainable Cities
- Children as Language Brokers
- Children as Perpetrators of Crime
- Children, Code-switching and
- Children in the Industrial Revolution
- Children with Autism in a Brazilian Context
- Children, Young People, and Architecture
- Children's Humor
- Children’s Museums
- Children’s Parliaments
- Children’s Reading Development and Instruction
- Children's Views of Childhood
- China, Japan, and Korea
- China’s One Child Policy
- Citizenship
- Civil Rights Movement and Desegregation
- Class
- Classical World, Children in the
- Clothes and Costume, Children’s
- Colonial America, Child Witches in
- Colonization and Nationalism
- Color Symbolism and Child Development
- Common World Childhoods
- Competitiveness, Children and
- Conceptual Development in Early Childhood
- Congenital Disabilities
- Constructivist Approaches to Childhood
- Consumer Culture, Children and
- Consumption, Child and Teen
- Conversation Analysis and Research with Children
- Critical Approaches to Children’s Work and the Concept of ...
- Critical Perspectives on Boys’ Circumcision
- Crying
- Cultural psychology and human development
- Debt and Financialization of Childhood
- Disability
- Discipline and Punishment
- Discrimination
- Disney, Walt
- Divorce And Custody
- Dolls
- Domestic Violence
- Drawings, Children’s
- Early Childhood
- Early Childhood Care and Education, Selected History of
- Eating disorders and obesity
- Education: Learning and Schooling Worldwide
- Environment, Children and the
- Environmental Education and Children
- Ethics in Research with Children
- Eugenics
- Evolutionary Studies of Childhood
- Family Meals
- Fandom (Fan Studies)
- Fathers
- Female Genital Cutting
- Feral and "Wild" Children
- Fetuses and Embryos
- Filicide
- Films about Children
- Films for Children
- Folk Tales, Fairy Tales and
- Folklore
- Food
- Foundlings and Abandoned Children
- Freud, Anna
- Freud, Sigmund
- Friends and Peers: Psychological Perspectives
- Froebel, Friedrich
- Gangs
- Gay and Lesbian Parents
- Gender and Childhood
- Generations, The Concept of
- Geographies, Children's
- Gifted and Talented Children
- Globalization
- Growing Up in the Digital Era
- Hall, G. Stanley
- Happiness in Children
- Hindu Views of Childhood and Child Rearing
- Hispanic Childhoods (U.S.)
- Historical Approaches to Child Witches
- History of Childhood in America
- History of Childhood in Canada
- HIV/AIDS, Growing Up with
- Homeschooling
- Humor and Laughter
- Images of Childhood, Adulthood, and Old Age in Children’s ...
- Infancy and Ethnography
- Infant Mortality in a Global Context
- Innocence and Childhood
- Institutional Care
- Intercultural Learning and Teaching with Children
- Islamic Views of Childhood
- Japan, Childhood in
- Juvenile Detention in the US
- Key, Ellen
- Klein, Melanie
- Labor, Child
- Latin America
- Learning, Language
- Learning to Write
- Legends, Contemporary
- Literary Representations of Childhood
- Literature, Children's
- Love and Care in the Early Years
- Magazines for Teenagers
- Maltreatment, Child
- Maria Montessori
- Marxism and Childhood
- Masculinities/Boyhood
- Material Cultures of Western Childhoods
- Mead, Margaret
- Media, Children in the
- Media Culture, Children's
- Medieval and Anglo-Saxon Childhoods
- Menstruation
- Middle Childhood
- Middle East
- Migration
- Miscarriage
- Missionaries/Evangelism
- Moral Development
- Moral Panics
- Mothers
- Multi-culturalism and Education
- Music and Babies
- Nation and Childhood
- Native American and Aboriginal Canadian Childhood
- New Reproductive Technologies and Assisted Conception
- Nursery Rhymes
- Organizations, Nongovernmental
- Orphans
- Parental Gender Preferences, The Social Construction of
- Parenting
- Pediatrics, History of
- Peer Culture
- Peter Pan
- Philosophy and Childhood
- Piaget, Jean
- Play
- Politics, Children and
- Postcolonial Childhoods
- Post-Modernism
- Poverty, Rights, and Well-being, Child
- Pre-Colombian Mesoamerica Childhoods
- Prostitution and Pornography, Child
- Psychoanalysis
- Queer Theory and Childhood
- Race and Ethnicity
- Racism, Children and
- Radio, Children, and Young People
- Readers, Children as
- Refugee and Displaced Children
- Reimagining Early Childhood Education, Reconceptualizing a...
- Relational Ontologies
- Relational Pedagogies
- Rights, Children’s
- Risk and Resilience
- Russia
- School Shootings
- Sex Education in the United States
- Sexuality
- Siblings
- Social and Cultural Capital of Childhood
- Social Habitus in Childhood
- Social Movements, Children's
- Social Policy, Children and
- Socialization and Child Rearing
- Socio-cultural Perspectives on Children's Spirituality
- Sociology of Childhood
- South African Birth to Twenty Project
- South Asia
- Special Education
- Spiritual Development in Childhood and Adolescence
- Spock, Benjamin
- Sports and Organized Games
- Street Children
- Street Children And Brazil
- Subcultures
- Sure Start
- Teenage Fathers
- Teenage Pregnancy
- Television
- The Bible and Children
- The Harms and Prevention of Drugs and Alcohol on Children
- The Spaces of Childhood
- Theater for Children and Young People
- Theories, Pedagogic
- Tourism
- Toys
- Transgender Children
- Tweens
- Twins and Multiple Births
- Unaccompanied Migrant Children
- United Kingdom, History of Adoption and Fostering in the
- United States, Schooling in the
- Value of Children
- Views of Childhood, Jewish and Christian
- Violence, Children and
- Visual Representations of Childhood
- Voice, Participation, and Agency
- Vygotsky, Lev and His Cultural-historical Approach to Deve...
- War
- Welfare Law in the United States, Child
- Well-Being, Child
- Western Europe and Scandinavia
- Witchcraft in the Contemporary World, Children and
- Work and Apprenticeship, Children's
- Young Carers
- Young Children and Inclusion
- Young Children’s Imagination
- Young Lives
- Young People, Alcohol, and Urban Life
- Young People and Climate Activism
- Young People and Disadvantaged Environments in Affluent Co...