The Weapon Focus Effect in Eyewitness Memory
- LAST REVIEWED: 26 May 2023
- LAST MODIFIED: 26 May 2023
- DOI: 10.1093/obo/9780199828340-0313
- LAST REVIEWED: 26 May 2023
- LAST MODIFIED: 26 May 2023
- DOI: 10.1093/obo/9780199828340-0313
Introduction
The identification of criminal perpetrators by eyewitnesses is a staple form of evidence in courts of law. In the 1970s psychological scientists began a systematic study of eyewitness identification using controlled experiments, and much has been learned through thousands of lab studies about factors that put the reliability of eyewitness evidence at risk. Laboratory science has soundly established that the rate of mistaken identification varies as a function of conditions during the witnessed event, the retention interval, and the method of conducting an identification procedure. A useful distinction has been made between two types of factors that influence eyewitness accuracy: system and estimator variables. System variables are those that are (or could be) controlled to improve the accuracy of eyewitness reports, particularly through science-informed police procedures such as non-leading interview protocols, fair lineup structure, and double-blind lineups. Estimator variables influence eyewitness memory and accuracy but are not under the control of the criminal justice system, such as conditions during the crime event (e.g., lighting, distance, obstacles to view), aspects of the criminal (e.g., number of perpetrators, facial disguise), and characteristics of the witness (e.g., visual acuity, stress). One estimator variable—referred to as the weapon focus effect—describes the phenomenon in which the presence of a weapon at the scene of a crime impairs the witness’s memory for the perpetrator and other details of the crime. The basic idea is that the weapon captures the visual attention of the witness and thereby distracts witness attention from other important features of the visual scene such as the face of the perpetrator. The eyewitness is simply less able to adequately encode and subsequently recall details peripheral to the weapon. The weapon focus effect has garnered attention in labs and courtrooms over the more than forty years of eyewitness research. The cumulative body of weapon focus research provides support for the claim that the presence of a weapon draws the attention of an eyewitness. In doing so, this weapon focus can diminish the ability of the eyewitness to later recognize and describe the culprit.
Overview: Scientific Status of the Weapon Focus Effect
Kassin, et al. 1989 assessed the status of a variety of eyewitness memory topics through a survey of eyewitness experts. A number of topics were endorsed as strongly established principles (e.g., regarding biased lineup instructions), but only 57 percent of experts agreed that the weapon focus effect was reliable enough for psychologists to present in courtroom testimony. This report served as a catalyst for a meta-analytic review of the nascent weapon focus literature. Steblay 1992 located nineteen tests of the weapon focus effect from twelve articles and reported a significant overall difference between weapon-present and weapon-absent conditions, with a small effect for witnesses’ lineup identification accuracy, and a moderate impairment for witnesses’ memory of perpetrator clothing and facial characteristics (“feature accuracy”). Witness accuracy was worse in a weapon-present condition compared to a weapon-absent condition. A decade later, Kassin, et al. 2001 repeated the survey of experts, and the majority of eyewitness scientists at that point were convinced of the reliability of the weapon focus effect (WFE), a significant jump from 57 percent to 87 percent. Fawcett, et al. 2013 followed with a meta-analysis of studies to 2009. Their review supported the weapon focus effect, again noting a small impact of the weapon on witness identification accuracy and a larger impact on feature accuracy. In 2014, the National Academy of Sciences (NAS) confirmed that “the so-called weapon focus is a real-world case in point for eyewitness identification, in which attention is compellingly drawn to emotionally laden stimuli, such as a gun or a knife, at the expense of acquiring greater visual information about the face of the perpetrator” (National Academy of Sciences 2014, p. 55). Fawcett, et al. 2016 followed up the 2013 review with a summary article that encompassed previous work on the topic, including three prior meta-analyses (Steblay 1992; Fawcett, et al. 2013; Kocab and Sporer 2016). They concluded that laboratory evidence demonstrates that an unexpected weapon reduces the accuracy of subsequent suspect identification attempts and witness descriptions of the crime: “The weapon focus effect is sufficiently robust and uncontroversial to guide practice so long as consideration is given to the circumstances surrounding the criminal event with a particular emphasis on witness expectation” (p. 257).
Fawcett, J. M., K. A. Peace, and A. Greve. 2016. Looking down the barrel of a gun: What do we know about the weapon focus effect? Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition 5.3: 257–263.
DOI: 10.1016/j.jarmac.2016.07.005
Fawcett and colleagues state support for the WFE but also caution regarding evaluation in real crime scenarios. Three factors may influence the impact of the WFE: a witness’s perceived threat; aspects of the crime (e.g., duration), and the memory collection procedure. They conclude that the weapon focus is appropriate for court consideration, but must be scrutinized to determine its relevance in a given case.
Fawcett, J. M., E. J. Russell, K. A. Peace, and J. Christie. 2013. Of guns and geese: A meta-analytic review of the “weapon focus” literature. Psychology, Crime, and Law 19.1: 35–66.
DOI: 10.1080/1068316X.2011.599325
This meta-analysis supported the WFE for eyewitness identification accuracy (g =.22) and feature accuracy (g =.75). A rule of thumb is that g =.2 is a small effect size, g =.5 is a medium effect size, and g =.8 is a large effect size.
Kassin, S., P. C. Ellsworth, and V. L. Smith. 1989. The general acceptance of psychological research on eyewitness testimony: A survey of the experts. American Psychologist 44:1089–1098.
DOI: 10.1037/0003-066X.44.8.1089
Sixty-three experts were surveyed about their courtroom experiences and opinions on eyewitness topics. Just 56.5 percent of the experts judged the research on weapon focus to be reliable enough to testify about it; 27 percent reported that they had testified about weapon focus.
Kassin, S. M., V. A. Tubb, H. M. Hosch, and A. Memon. 2001. On the “general acceptance” of eyewitness testimony research: A new survey of the experts. American Psychologist 56: 405–416.
DOI: 10.1037//0003-.66X.56.5.405
Sixty-four experts were asked about their experiences and opinions on thirty eyewitness phenomena. The weapon focus effect was rated reliable by 87 percent of the experts; 77 percent stated that they would testify on this topic. Ninety-seven percent of experts agreed that there is a research basis for testimony.
Kocab, K., and S. Sporer. 2016. The weapon focus effect for person identifications and descriptions: A meta-analysis. In Advances in psychology and law. Edited by M. K. Miller and B. H. Bornstein, 71–117. New York: Springer.
This chapter is published in an edited volume. The review covered studies through 2009. Analysis found a moderate effect size for feature accuracy and for description of the weapon, but not a significant WFE for identification accuracy. The Fawcett, et al. 2016 statement considered this work as part of its conclusion that the WFE is sufficiently robust to be considered in court.
National Academy of Sciences. 2014. Identifying the culprit: Assessing eyewitness identification. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
A committee of the National Academy of Sciences reviewed eyewitness science and published their recommendations for use of eyewitness science in practice and policy. The report summarizes the science of estimator and system variables.
Steblay, N. M. 1992. A meta-analytic review of the weapon-focus effect. Law and Human Behavior 16:413–424.
DOI: 10.1007/BF02352267
This first meta-analysis of the WFE reported a small but statistically significant effect size (h =.13) for identification accuracy of witnesses (reduced accuracy when the weapon was present versus absent) and a moderate effect size (d =.55) for feature accuracy. The report included twelve articles, of which nine were published.
Wells, G. L. 1978. Applied eyewitness testimony research: System variables and estimator variables. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 36:1546–1557.
DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.36.12.1546
A seminal article for eyewitness research that provided a framework for understanding how two different types of factors influence eyewitness accuracy: estimator and system variables. The weapon focus effect is one of many estimator variables that have been explored in research studies.
Wells, G. L., M. B. Kovera, A. B. Douglass, N. Brewer, C. A. Meissner, and J. T. Wixted. 2020. Policy and procedure recommendations for the collection and preservation of eyewitness identification evidence. Law and Human Behavior 44.1: 3–36.
DOI: 10.1037/lhb0000359
This is a consensus document of eyewitness scientists stating nine recommendations for the collection of identification evidence from eyewitnesses. This document summarizes much of the research on system variables.
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content on this page. Please subscribe or login.
How to Subscribe
Oxford Bibliographies Online is available by subscription and perpetual access to institutions. For more information or to contact an Oxford Sales Representative click here.
Article
- Abnormal Psychology
- Academic Assessment
- Acculturation and Health
- Action Regulation Theory
- Action Research
- Addictive Behavior
- Adolescence
- Adoption, Social, Psychological, and Evolutionary Perspect...
- Adulthood
- Advanced Theory of Mind
- Affective Forecasting
- Affirmative Action
- Ageism
- Ageism at Work
- Aggression
- Allport, Gordon
- Alzheimer’s Disease
- Ambulatory Assessment in Behavioral Science
- Analysis of Covariance (ANCOVA)
- Anger
- Animal Behavior
- Animal Learning
- Anxiety Disorders
- Art and Aesthetics, Psychology of
- Artificial Intelligence, Machine Learning, and Psychology
- Assessment and Clinical Applications of Individual Differe...
- Attachment in Social and Emotional Development across the ...
- Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) in Adults
- Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) in Childre...
- Attitudes
- Attitudinal Ambivalence
- Attraction in Close Relationships
- Attribution Theory
- Authoritarian Personality
- Autism
- Bayesian Statistical Methods in Psychology
- Behavior Therapy, Rational Emotive
- Behavioral Economics
- Behavioral Genetics
- Belief Perseverance
- Bereavement and Grief
- Biological Psychology
- Birth Order
- Body Image in Men and Women
- Burnout
- Bystander Effect
- Categorical Data Analysis in Psychology
- Childhood and Adolescence, Peer Victimization and Bullying...
- Clark, Mamie Phipps
- Clinical Neuropsychology
- Clinical Psychology
- Cognitive Consistency Theories
- Cognitive Dissonance Theory
- Cognitive Neuroscience
- Communication, Nonverbal Cues and
- Comparative Psychology
- Competence to Stand Trial: Restoration Services
- Competency to Stand Trial
- Computational Psychology
- Conflict Management in the Workplace
- Conformity, Compliance, and Obedience
- Consciousness
- Coping Processes
- Correspondence Analysis in Psychology
- Counseling Psychology
- Courage
- Creativity
- Creativity at Work
- Critical Thinking
- Cross-Cultural Psychology
- Cultural Psychology
- Daily Life, Research Methods for Studying
- Data Science Methods for Psychology
- Data Sharing in Psychology
- Death and Dying
- Deceiving and Detecting Deceit
- Defensive Processes
- DEI in Organizations
- Depression
- Depressive Disorders
- Development, Prenatal
- Developmental Psychology (Cognitive)
- Developmental Psychology (Social)
- Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM...
- Discrimination
- Disgust
- Dissociative Disorders
- Drugs and Behavior
- Eating Disorders
- Ecological Psychology
- Ecopsychology
- Educational Settings, Assessment of Thinking in
- Effect Size
- Embodiment and Embodied Cognition
- Emerging Adulthood
- Emotion
- Emotional Intelligence
- Empathy and Altruism
- Employee Stress and Well-Being
- Environmental Neuroscience and Environmental Psychology
- Ethics in Psychological Practice
- Event Perception
- Evolutionary Psychology
- Expansive Posture
- Experimental Existential Psychology
- Exploratory Data Analysis
- Eyewitness Testimony
- Eysenck, Hans
- Factor Analysis
- Festinger, Leon
- Five-Factor Model of Personality
- Flynn Effect, The
- Forensic Psychology
- Forgiveness
- Friendships, Children's
- Fundamental Attribution Error/Correspondence Bias
- Gambler's Fallacy
- Game Theory and Psychology
- Geropsychology, Clinical
- Global Mental Health
- Habit Formation and Behavior Change
- Happiness
- Health Psychology
- Health Psychology Research and Practice, Measurement in
- Heider, Fritz
- Heuristics and Biases
- History of Psychology
- Human Factors
- Humanistic Psychology
- Humor
- Hypnosis
- Implicit Association Test (IAT)
- Industrial and Organizational Psychology
- Inferential Statistics in Psychology
- Insanity Defense, The
- Intelligence
- Intelligence, Crystallized and Fluid
- Intercultural Psychology
- Intergroup Conflict
- International Classification of Diseases and Related Healt...
- International Psychology
- Interviewing in Forensic Settings
- Intimate Partner Violence, Psychological Perspectives on
- Introversion–Extraversion
- Item Response Theory
- Kurtosis
- Language
- Laughter
- Law, Psychology and
- Lazarus, Richard
- Leadership
- Learned Helplessness
- Learning Theory
- Learning versus Performance
- LGBTQ+ Romantic Relationships
- Lie Detection in a Forensic Context
- Life-Span Development
- Lineups
- Locus of Control
- Loneliness and Health
- Mathematical Psychology
- Meaning in Life
- Mechanisms and Processes of Peer Contagion
- Media Violence, Psychological Perspectives on
- Mediation Analysis
- Meditation
- Memories, Autobiographical
- Memories, Flashbulb
- Memories, Repressed and Recovered
- Memory, False
- Memory, Human
- Memory, Implicit versus Explicit
- Memory in Educational Settings
- Memory, Semantic
- Meta-Analysis
- Metacognition
- Metamemory
- Metaphor, Psychological Perspectives on
- Microaggressions
- Military Psychology
- Mindfulness
- Mindfulness and Education
- Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory (MMPI)
- Money, Psychology of
- Moral Conviction
- Moral Development
- Moral Psychology
- Moral Reasoning
- Motivation
- Music
- Narcissism
- Narrative
- Nature versus Nurture Debate in Psychology
- Neuroscience of Associative Learning
- Nonergodicity in Psychology and Neuroscience
- Nonparametric Statistical Analysis in Psychology
- Observational (Non-Randomized) Studies
- Obsessive-Complusive Disorder (OCD)
- Occupational Health Psychology
- Older Workers
- Olfaction, Human
- Operant Conditioning
- Optimism and Pessimism
- Organizational Justice
- Parenting Stress
- Parenting Styles
- Parents' Beliefs about Children
- Path Models
- Peace Psychology
- Perception
- Perception, Person
- Performance Appraisal
- Personality and Health
- Personality Disorders
- Personality Psychology
- Person-Centered and Experiential Psychotherapies: From Car...
- Phenomenological Psychology
- Placebo Effects in Psychology
- Play Behavior
- Positive Psychological Capital (PsyCap)
- Positive Psychology
- Posttraumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD)
- Prejudice and Stereotyping
- Pretrial Publicity
- Prisoner's Dilemma
- Problem Solving and Decision Making
- Procrastination
- Prosocial Behavior
- Prosocial Spending and Well-Being
- Protocol Analysis
- Psycholinguistics
- Psychological Literacy
- Psychological Perspectives on Food and Eating
- Psychology, Political
- Psychoneuroimmunology
- Psychophysics, Visual
- Psychotherapy
- Psychotic Disorders
- Publication Bias in Psychology
- Race
- Reasoning, Counterfactual
- Rehabilitation Psychology
- Relationships
- Reliability–Contemporary Psychometric Conceptions
- Religion, Psychology and
- Remote Work
- Replication Initiatives in Psychology
- Research Methods
- Resilience
- Risk Taking
- Role of the Expert Witness in Forensic Psychology, The
- Rumination
- Sample Size Planning for Statistical Power and Accurate Es...
- Savoring
- Schizophrenic Disorders
- School Psychology
- School Psychology, Counseling Services in
- Self, Gender and
- Self, Psychology of the
- Self-Construal
- Self-Control
- Self-Deception
- Self-Determination Theory
- Self-Efficacy
- Self-Esteem
- Self-Monitoring
- Self-Regulation in Educational Settings
- Self-Report Tests, Measures, and Inventories in Clinical P...
- Sensation Seeking
- Sex and Gender
- Sexual Minority Parenting
- Sexual Orientation
- Signal Detection Theory and its Applications
- Simpson's Paradox in Psychology
- Single People
- Single-Case Experimental Designs
- Situational Strength
- Skinner, B.F.
- Sleep and Dreaming
- Small Groups
- Social Class and Social Status
- Social Cognition
- Social Neuroscience
- Social Support
- Social Touch and Massage Therapy Research
- Somatoform Disorders
- Spatial Attention
- Sports Psychology
- Stanford Prison Experiment (SPE): Icon and Controversy
- Stereotype Threat
- Stereotypes
- Stress and Coping, Psychology of
- Student Success in College
- Subjective Wellbeing Homeostasis
- Suicide
- Taste, Psychological Perspectives on
- Teaching of Psychology
- Terror Management Theory
- Testing and Assessment
- The Concept of Validity in Psychological Assessment
- The Neuroscience of Emotion Regulation
- The Reasoned Action Approach and the Theories of Reasoned ...
- The Weapon Focus Effect in Eyewitness Memory
- Theory of Mind
- Therapy, Cognitive-Behavioral
- Thinking Skills in Educational Settings
- Time Perception
- Trait Perspective
- Trauma Psychology
- Twin Studies
- Type A Behavior Pattern (Coronary Prone Personality)
- Unconscious Processes
- Video Games and Violent Content
- Virtues and Character Strengths
- Wisdom
- Women and Science, Technology, Engineering, and Math (STEM...
- Women, Psychology of
- Work Well-Being
- Workforce Training Evaluation
- Wundt, Wilhelm