Resilient Health Systems
- LAST MODIFIED: 28 March 2018
- DOI: 10.1093/obo/9780199756797-0177
- LAST MODIFIED: 28 March 2018
- DOI: 10.1093/obo/9780199756797-0177
Introduction
To understand health system resilience requires at least some exploration of the wider uses of the term resilience, not only its original Latin conception but also critiques of its current and recent sociopolitical usage—does frequently using this term affect our consciousness, outlook, and actions positively or negatively? The term resilience in academic literature was evident in the late 1990s but started to increase significantly from around 2004 after an outbreak of severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) that occurred in China 2002–2003. Now resilience also starts to be linked with health systems. Increases in emerging disease outbreaks, natural disasters, extreme weather events due to climate change, and economic crises all put stress on communities and health systems. Do they cope with the shock, can they continue to provide some basic services, and can they recover to normal functioning afterward? These are the basic questions of health systems resilience. Health systems are complex, as are the contexts within which they function. Inevitably, discussion on health system resilience frequently takes on a broad “whole-of-system” approach encompassing individual, environment, community, and infrastructure resilience, as well as resilience in the many subsystems that make up a health system. In fact, resilience can be seen as a feature needed by everything in our complex and interconnected world. Then the question has to be asked, is the concept of resilience in health systems different from a robust health system, or a well-functioning health system? What would be the features of resilience that go beyond robust or well functioning? What do we have to add to activities in health system strengthening to achieve resilience? How broadly should the net be cast? Health system strengthening in recent years has focused on the six health system building blocks (stewardship/governance, financing, human resources, medicines and technologies, information, and service delivery), emphasizing their interconnectedness, as in systems thinking: make a change here and unexpected consequences might occur over there. More recently, the World Health Organization (WHO) has proposed five essential attributes that health systems need in order to progress toward universal health coverage (UHC)—equity, efficiency, quality, accountability, and sustainability and resilience. Within the latter, community resilience is featured. It can be difficult to distinguish directions of impact, but it is certain that health system resilience and community resilience are interlinked. Interconnectedness of complex adaptive systems is a thread weaving through this article. While the focus aims to be health system resilience, some references on community resilience are included where the connection to health system resilience is strong. Neither individual resilience, as often used in mental health, nor ecosystem resilience is covered in this article.
Definitions
The term “resilience” is of 17th-century origin, used in physics to indicate the ability of an object to absorb and then release energy when it is changed by a force. Most documents writing on resilience give one or more related definitions. Norris, et al. 2008 provides a table of definitions from several disciplines. Castleden, et al. 2011 reports on a systematic review on the use of the term. Maresso, et al. 2013 also briefly describes how the term resilience is used in different fields of study, and then, in conversation with several experts, considers what resilience means in a health system. They pose a strong linkage with good governance. Allmark, et al. 2014 says that resilience is always (i) of a material or object (ii) to a force or event (iii) to an endpoint; for example, as with (i) a rubber ball (ii) hitting a wall or bat, (iii) changing shape and then returning to its original shape. Applying this, resilience engineering lists four essential abilities for organizations: the ability (a) to respond to what happens, (b) to monitor critical developments, (c) to anticipate future threats and opportunities, and (d) to learn from past experience—both successes and failures. Kutzin and Sparkes 2016 distinguishes between actions to strengthen health systems and resilience as an achievement. Chandra, et al. 2011 makes strong linkages between individual, health system, and community resilience. Using the construct in Allmark, et al. 2014, “health system resilience” might be (i) of system components, (ii) to a flu pandemic or major disaster, (iii) with the endpoint to return to normal functioning. Resilience as applied to health systems gained greater prominence after the SARS and Ebola outbreaks. Kieny and Dovlo 2015 stresses the ability to absorb a shock like Ebola and, at the same time, continue to provide regular health services, with particular concern on primary health care. World Health Organization 2016 and Maresso, et al. 2013 include the need to prepare for and adapt to changing environments. This deals with Allmark, et al. 2014, which argues that as the previous state may not be desirable, an improved state should be sought. Similarly, looking at resilience in the built environment, Whorley 2015 comments that increasingly a comprehensive approach is used with ecological, engineering, and evolutionary resilience. Resilience is not an isolated construct. It is a result of inputs, processes, culture, and relationships in local, national, and regional contexts. It could be considered a critical aspect of and a result of all systems interconnectedness.
Allmark, P., S. Bhanbhro, and T. Chrisp. 2014. An argument against the focus on community resilience in public health. BMC Public Health 14:62.
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2458-14-62Save Citation »Export Citation » Share Citation »
Identifies three key aspects of resilience: (i) of something, (ii) to something, (iii) to an endpoint, as in (i) a rubber ball, (ii) to a blunt force, (iii) to its original shape. Then argues that often the previous endpoint is not desirable, so something better is needed. For example, a chronically deprived community cannot have an endpoint of returning to chronic deprivation.
Find this resource:
Castleden, M., M. McKee, V. Murray, and G. Leonardi. 2011. Resilience thinking in health protection. Journal of Public Health 33.3: 369–377.
DOI: 10.1093/pubmed/fdr027Save Citation »Export Citation » Share Citation »
Reports on a systematic review of literature on concepts of resilience. Table 1 provides sample definitions and studies related to different types of resilience: community, disaster, socio-ecological, individual, infrastructure, and organizational resilience. Important elements of resilience include communication, learning, adaptation, risk awareness, and “social capital.”
Find this resource:
Chandra, A., J. Acosta, S. Howard, et al. 2011. Building community resilience to disasters: A way forward to enhance national health security. Santa Monica, CA: RAND.
Save Citation »Export Citation » Share Citation »
Makes strong linkages between individual, health system, and community resilience. Staff performance and competency is important to build resilience in the public health system, which depends upon the ability of people to successfully accomplish the key activities that support resilience. Maps definitions of resilience from a literature review against identified elements of resilience. Provides sample measures of resilience.
Find this resource:
Kieny, M. P., and D. Dovlo. 2015. Beyond Ebola: A new agenda for resilient health systems. Lancet 385.9963: 91–92.
DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)62479-XSave Citation »Export Citation » Share Citation »
A resilient health system is one able to absorb the shock of an emergency like Ebola and, at the same time, continue to provide some essential regular health services. This is necessary so that other sectors of the economy can function with a healthy workforce. The paper argues for the need to build health systems that are grounded in primary health-care principles and capable of responding to routine as well as unexpected challenges. This is generally not achieved through vertical programs.
Find this resource:
Kutzin, J., and S. P. Sparkes. 2016. Health systems strengthening, universal health coverage, health security and resilience. Bulletin of the World Health Organization 94.1: 2.
DOI: 10.2471/BLT.15.165050Save Citation »Export Citation » Share Citation »
This one-page editorial provides clarity on meaning and use of terms: health system strengthening is what we do; universal health coverage, health security, and resilience are what we want to achieve.
Find this resource:
Maresso, A., M. Wismar, S. Greer, and W. Palm. 2013. What makes health systems resilient and innovative? Voices from Europe. In Special issue: Building resilient and innovative health systems. Edited by D. McDaid, A. Maresso, and J. Cylus. Eurohealth 19.3: 3–6.
Save Citation »Export Citation » Share Citation »
Gives a brief summary of definitions from different fields, such as physics, biology, psychology, to show how the term resilience has been used and the similarity of conceptual components. Goes on to explore the features and components of resilience in health systems from the perspectives of several experts. Resilience is clearly linked to good governance in health systems, and details of what this means are presented. Implications for health systems in Europe are discussed.
Find this resource:
Norris, F. H., S. P. Stevens, B. Pfefferbaum, K. F. Wyche, and R. L. Pfefferbaum. 2008. Community resilience as a metaphor, theory, set of capacities, and strategy for disaster readiness. American Journal of Community Psychology 41.1–2: 127–150.
DOI: 10.1007/s10464-007-9156-6Save Citation »Export Citation » Share Citation »
Presents detailed discussion on community resilience in four areas of adaptive capacity—economic, social, information, and community competence. Provides a table of definitions of resilience, interesting diagrams of networked adaptive capacities, and an extensive bibliography. Links community resilience to population wellness, social capital, and networks.
Find this resource:
Whorley, F. 2015. Building resilience: A framework assessing costs and benefits of resilient design strategies. Perkins+Will Research Journal 7.1.
Save Citation »Export Citation » Share Citation »
Examines costs and benefits of different design strategies. Designing for resilience considers acute and chronic hazards, climate change, interconnectivity between systems, and scales of functioning. Outlines how the threat of crises fundamentally changes the way we live. How resilience is viewed and how its components are identified influence which hazards are considered in infrastructure design. For the built environment, three predominant approaches to resilience are ecological, engineering, and evolutionary resilience. Increasingly, a combination of all three is used.
Find this resource:
World Health Organization. 2016. Universal health coverage: Moving towards better health. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization.
Save Citation »Export Citation » Share Citation »
Resilience is the ability of health systems to cope with internal and external shocks and recover quickly, while also adapting to changing environments. Disasters, emerging diseases, and economic volatility pose serious threats to public health security. To ensure resilience for combating shocks, countries can take action to improve public health preparedness, assist communities in health promotion, and encourage health system adaptability.
Find this resource:
Critiques
Even though now widely used in many sectors, resilience is not universally accepted as an appropriate concept to guide our thinking and efforts. Gebauer 2015 is concerned that resilience is being used as a simplistic panacea for all the threats society faces in the early 21st century. Evans and Reid 2015, Gebauer 2015, and Neocleous 2015 are worried that so much focus on resilience is actually changing the consciousness of society and politicians, limiting our imaginations for a better future by making catastrophe appear normal and inevitable. In turn, narrowed thinking restricts efforts for social improvement and, instead, expects communities to look after themselves, with the poorest and most vulnerable worst affected. Topp, et al. 2016, seeing resilience as the new dominant mode of thinking in health system development, advises against attempts to strengthen weak health systems without considering the broader political and economic context that actually created their debilitated situation. On a different perspective, Hollnagel and Braithwaite 2013 urges that the complex features of medical care should be well understood in order to improve its resilience. Linear approaches to building resilience, quality or efficiency, will not succeed. Allmark, et al. 2014 (cited under Definitions) debates alternatives to the idea of “bouncing back.” The authors suggest using better-known and well-tried approaches to strengthening communities, such as social capital, rather than the vague idea of resilience.
Allmark, P., S. Bhanbhro, and T. Chrisp. 2014. An argument against the focus on community resilience in public health. BMC Public Health 14:62.
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2458-14-62Save Citation »Export Citation » Share Citation »
Community resilience has to go beyond bouncing back. It is difficult to distinguish indicators of community resilience from general community well-being. Community well-being has been described with reference to social capital. Proposes that building social assets could be a more useful approach, with its focus on human capital, built capital and natural capital, rather than the more intangible concept of community resilience.
Find this resource:
Evans, B., and J. Reid. 2015. Exhausted by resilience: Response to the commentaries. Resilience 3.2: 154–159.
DOI: 10.1080/21693293.2015.1022991Save Citation »Export Citation » Share Citation »
A philosophical discussion on why, in this age of catastrophe, we are persistently asked to think about resilience. Discusses resiliency as a new form of political nihilism, with claims and policies that force people to embrace servitude as liberation. Believes that a focus on resilience creates a world image where disaster and insecurity are assumed as natural and inevitable. Expecting communities to be resilient reduces burdens on social services but places it on communities, even if they are impoverished.
Find this resource:
Gebauer, T. 2015. Resilience: Fit for disaster. Medico International, 19 May 2016.
Save Citation »Export Citation » Share Citation »
A political discussion on how resilience changes our consciousness—moving from social ideals for a safe and healthy world to how people and systems can protect themselves against economic, social, and environmental disasters, and how to survive in a profoundly unbalanced world. Working together for the future is now about adapting to processes of destruction instead of correcting those destructive conditions. We are urged more to work on disaster management instead of disaster prevention. Not to stop or slow down climate change, but to adapt to it—if you can. The poor will be worst affected.
Find this resource:
Hollnagel, E., and J. Braithwaite, eds. 2013. Resilient health care. Vol. 1. Farnham, UK: Ashgate.
Save Citation »Export Citation » Share Citation »
Emphasizes the multifaceted nature of health care with multiple stakeholders and warns against using simplistic linear approaches in attempting to find solutions to quality and efficiency issues. To improve health care and make it more resilient, the complex components of clinical work must be well understood. Yet many policy, management, accreditation, and regulation solutions focus on “work as it ought to be,” not how it actually is. Available online for purchase.
Find this resource:
Neocleous, M. 2015. Resisting resilience: Against the colonization of political imagination. Medico International, 9 June 2015.
Save Citation »Export Citation » Share Citation »
Connects the resilience and security agendas at the political level. Resilience is apprehension of the future, imagined as disaster/attack and recovery. Resilience explicitly links security with urban planning, civil contingency measures, public health, financial institutions, corporate risk, and the environment, previously difficult for the state to do. But, when there is no political imagination except for war or catastrophe, then there is no political future except infinite preparation for attack.
Find this resource:
Topp, S. M., W. Flores, V. Sriram, and K. Scott. 2016. Critiquing the concept of resilience in health systems. Health Systems Global, 12 April 2016.
Save Citation »Export Citation » Share Citation »
Questions the “hegemonic” or predominant focus on resilience in health policy and systems work. Weak health systems exist in complex realities with their many deficiencies largely due to poor policies, badly managed economy, and unfair power dynamics. Doing bits here and there to “strengthen” the health system, without dealing with the politics, economy, and power dynamics, will not be successful in building resilience. Encouraging community self-reliance in these conditions of created poverty is also unrealistic and unfair.
Find this resource:
Frameworks
Definitions are usually statements, whereas frameworks are usually presented as a diagram, a table, or a list of attributes or components. European Commission 2015 provides a simple framework of resilience in health systems, including six components: workforce, funding, costing of services, information, risk adjustment, and governance (p. 11). Note the similarity to World Health Organization 2007, a framework with six health system building blocks. World Health Organization 2016 describes a new health system framework that comprises five attributes: quality, efficiency, equity, accountability, and sustainability and resilience. Here, resilience is only one of five attributes, or in the European Commission 2015, one of three (effectiveness, accessibility, and resilience). In alternative views, such as Ho, et al. 2016, other identified attributes are needed to build resilience. Certainly, World Health Organization 2016 emphasizes the interconnectedness and interdependency of the attributes. Gottret, et al. 2009 presents a simple framework in moving from the shock of the 2008 economic crisis back to population health. Major components of the framework are household, government, and other resources, and also availability, quality, demand, and access to health services. Rodin 2014 presents a framework of different characteristics for resilient health systems: aware, diverse, integrated, self-regulating, and adaptive. O’Sullivan, et al. 2013 presents a more complex diagram, a framework for critical social infrastructure to promote population health and resilience that involves networks, resources, coordination, and adaptive responses. World Health Organization 2017 uses sustainable development goals (SDGs) and health system components to develop a resilience framework for improving child protection and care.
European Commission. 2015. Communication from the Commission: On effective, accessible and resilient health systems. Brussels: European Commission.
Save Citation »Export Citation » Share Citation »
In the context of the demographic changes and the pressure on age-related expenditure, European countries’ future ability to provide high-quality care to all will depend on making health systems more resilient, more capable of coping with the challenges that lie ahead while remaining cost-effective and fiscally sustainable. Using simple frameworks, explores the components and available measures (indicators) of health system effectiveness, accessibility, and resilience.
Find this resource:
Gottret, P., A. Tandon, S. Sparkes, V. Gupta, V. Moran, and B. Peter. 2009. Protecting pro-poor health services during financial crises: Lessons from experience. Washington, DC: World Bank.
Save Citation »Export Citation » Share Citation »
Reviews effects of the 2008 financial crisis and previous crises for impact on health expenditure, health service utilization, and government and household responses, using a framework presented on p. 3. Households experienced reduced employment and reduced income, influencing their nutrition and health spending. Costs of catastrophic health events pushed many into extreme poverty. Women, children, the poor and informal sector workers were more affected. Governments must find ways to protect services for the most poor and vulnerable.
Find this resource:
Ho, K., N. al-Shorjabji, E. Brown, et al. 2016. Applying the resilient health system framework for universal health coverage. Studies in Health Technology and Informatics 231:54–62.
Save Citation »Export Citation » Share Citation »
Even though their focus is digital health, the framework they present is for the entire health system. It is built on three interlocked platforms including leadership and governance, resources, and information. The pillars include preventive services, public health, care services, and population engagement. The pillars represent dependable processes that generate and consume digital health information in a learning organization with objectives to meet population health needs and achieve universal health coverage.
Find this resource:
O’Sullivan, T. L., C. E. Kuziemsky, D. Toal-Sullivan, and W. Corneil. 2013. Unraveling the complexities of disaster management: A framework for critical social infrastructure to promote population health and resilience. Social Science and Medicine 93:238–246.
DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2012.07.040Save Citation »Export Citation » Share Citation »
Based on the results of their study, the authors present an interesting framework on social infrastructure needed for population health and resilience, highlighting the relationships between components. Similar to Rodin 2014, the four core themes represented in the framework are dynamic context, awareness and connectedness, adaptive response, and collaboration.
Find this resource:
Rodin, J. 2014. The resilience dividend introduction: Being strong in a world where things go wrong. New York: Public Affairs.
Save Citation »Export Citation » Share Citation »
Describes the need to be able to bounce back better, after all kinds of shocks, as an urgent social and economic issue. Proposes a framework of characteristics for resilient health systems: aware, diverse, integrated, self-regulating, and adaptive. Stories from many countries are used to describe these features of resilience. A line drawing on p. 293 represents the gains or dividend in developing resilience, and the costs and losses or deficit from lack of resilience.
Find this resource:
World Health Organization. 2007. Everyone’s business: Strengthening health systems to improve health outcomes; WHO’s framework for action. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization.
Save Citation »Export Citation » Share Citation »
A health system framework is presented on p. 3. Six building blocks include health workforce; health information; essential medical products, vaccines, and technologies; health financing; service delivery; and leadership and governance. There is continual dynamic interaction between these building blocks in order to achieve the health system goals: access, quality, and safety in service delivery; system responsiveness and efficiency for better health; and health equity with social- and financial-risk protection, including emergency preparedness.
Find this resource:
World Health Organization. 2016. Universal health coverage: Moving towards better health. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization.
Save Citation »Export Citation » Share Citation »
The framework is presented on p. 2. Here, the World Health Organization extends the framework of six building blocks to consider a set of critical attributes that are needed throughout the system in order for it to function well and progress toward universal health coverage (UHC). Resilience is one of the attributes, along with quality, efficiency, equity, and accountability. The attributes are interconnected and interdependent. It appears to be assumed that a well-functioning health system is resilient, but the question is not explicitly covered.
Find this resource:
World Health Organization. 2017. Inheriting a sustainable world? Atlas on children’s health and the environment. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization.
Save Citation »Export Citation » Share Citation »
The sustainable development goals are used as an interconnecting structure for work needed to protect and improve children’s health. In a context of poverty, climate change, urbanization, and globalization, presents a framework (p. viii) on environmental hazards faced by children at different ages. A similar operational framework (p. 46) for climate resilient health systems is based on the health system building blocks in World Health Organization 2007, using flowing lines to show the interconnectedness and interdependence of the six components.
Find this resource:
Global Risks
Ecotrust 2012 warns against overexploitation of the world’s resources and examines the operational systems that increase human vulnerability and reduce resilience and well-being. Lovell, et al. 2016 presents graphic and visual evidence that the concept of resilience has grown in use since the outbreak of severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) in China 2002–2003. The World Economic Forum produces an annual report looking at major risks facing countries and their populations. World Economic Forum 2015 and World Economic Forum 2016 both specify the spread of infectious diseases among the top ten risks with potential for enormous impact globally. Resilient health systems will help to detect and control these outbreaks (Nicholson, et al. 2016). World Economic Forum 2017 does not specify spread of infectious diseases as one of the top ten global risks, but does list a range of factors that would inevitably impact on health, categorized as technological, societal, geopolitical, environmental, and economic. In particular fiscal crises, extreme weather events, interstate conflict, food and water crises, and misuse of technologies could have broad impact on human health. In response to these global risks, United Nations 2015 sets out seventeen sustainable development goals (SDGs) with 169 targets, including a set for SDG, three on health. These seventeen interdependent and indivisible goals demonstrate the interconnectedness and complexities of our natural and man-made systems. Harm in one area will inexorably result in harm to another. Are we collectively socially and politically strong enough to turn the risks around and build a better, more resilient world?
Ecotrust. 2012. Resilience and transformation: A regional approach. Portland, OR: Ecotrust.
Save Citation »Export Citation » Share Citation »
Examines how our current systems and institutions of social, political, and economic relations are stuck in entrenched ways of thinking, leaving human populations vulnerable. Lists a set of core principles of resilience for functioning more efficiently within the world’s linked ecological and social systems to provide for human well-being. Advocates for smaller, more local and diverse ventures to promote resilience. Uses interesting maps, photographs, quotes, and recommendations to explain the ideas and actions proposed.
Find this resource:
Lovell, E., A. Bahadur, T. Tanner, and H. Morsi. 2016. Resilience: The big picture. London: Overseas Development Institute.
Save Citation »Export Citation » Share Citation »
This report uses big data and infographics to demonstrate key themes and emerging trends in resilience thinking and practice. Climate resilience was the most frequent resilience topic on Twitter, featuring in around 39 percent of resilience conversations in 2015, followed by conflict (21 percent) and water resilience (12 percent). All influence health.
Find this resource:
Nicholson, A., M. R. Snair, and J. Hermann, eds. 2016. Global health risk framework: Resilient and sustainable health systems to respond to global infectious disease outbreaks; Workshop summary. Papers presented at conferences on Global Health Risk Framework: Resilient and Sustainable Health Systems, held in Washington, DC, 2015. Washington, DC: National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine.
Save Citation »Export Citation » Share Citation »
This book is in response to the infectious disease outbreaks that have occurred since the 2000s, highlighting the disturbing recognition that an outbreak in one part of the world can threaten the health of the entire world. P. 89 presents a systems framework for pandemic disaster response and provides details on each aspect of the framework. Requires free registration to access online.
Find this resource:
United Nations. 2015. Transforming our world: The 2030 agenda for sustainable development. Geneva, Switzerland: United Nations.
Save Citation »Export Citation » Share Citation »
An ambitious agenda of seventeen goals with 169 targets. The goals are integrated and indivisible—they require and depend on each other to succeed. To progress requires people, planet, partnerships, peace, and prosperity to eliminate poverty and ensure everyone has sustainable and resilient access to food, water, shelter, energy, education, employment, and health services, in safe environments with their human rights respected. Aims to reduce the risks outlined in the Global Risk Reports.
Find this resource:
World Economic Forum. 2015. The global risks report 2015, 10th edition. Geneva, Switzerland: World Economic Forum.
Save Citation »Export Citation » Share Citation »
In 2015, the spread of infectious diseases was ranked as a risk likely to have the second greatest impact globally after water crises, which would also have significant and devastating health consequences. Interesting charts throughout the paper. Has a section on health in cities with the need for robust plans to face the threat of pandemics. Mitigating, preparing for, and building resilience against global risks is a long and complex process, a necessity often recognized in theory but difficult in practice.
Find this resource:
World Economic Forum. 2016. The global risks report 2016, 11th edition. Geneva, Switzerland: World Economic Forum.
Save Citation »Export Citation » Share Citation »
In 2016, spread of infectious diseases ranked number eight of top ten risks in terms of impact. In the chapter on global disease outbreaks, discusses risks. Current and new emerging infections as well as increasing antimicrobial resistance all pose challenges for weak or overstretched health systems. Discusses causes, vulnerability, and impact of increasing infectious diseases outbreaks, including the economic impact of aversion behavior. Emphasizes the importance of health communication, collaboration, financing, and vaccine development.
Find this resource:
World Economic Forum. 2017. The global risks report 2017, 12th edition. Geneva, Switzerland: World Economic Forum.
Save Citation »Export Citation » Share Citation »
In 2017, disease outbreaks is not listed as one of the top ten global risks. Instead, health is covered in the section on social protection, and deals largely with increasing demand and cost of services with changing demographics, more in some countries than others. Questions whether health systems and their supporting financing systems can adapt fast enough to maintain the levels and quality of service delivery needed due to health transitions and changing population health. Adaptation is a key feature of resilience.
Find this resource:
Books
Two volumes on resilient health care, Hollnagel and Braithwaite 2013 and Wears, et al. 2015, focus in on clinical care rather than being concerned with the overall health system. Rodin 2014 and Bui, et al. 2016 both describe numerous examples of efforts across many countries where resilience has been demonstrated. Rodin 2014, also cited in Frameworks, can be purchased online at low cost. Buckley, et al. 2014 sees investment in building resilient health systems as a global public good. Similarly, Hallegatte, et al. 2017 makes a strong link between building disaster preparedness among poor and vulnerable groups with poverty reduction. So much more could be done at relatively low cost and with powerful impact. Nicholson, et al. 2016 also focuses on building resilient health systems to respond to major disasters. Commission on a Global Health Risk Framework for the Future 2016 emphasizes that building health system resilience is not a one-off activity but multiple continuing efforts that need to be coordinated and interconnected.
Buckley, G. J., J. E. Lange, and E. A. Peterson, eds. 2014. Investing in global health systems: Sustaining gains, transforming lives. Washington, DC: National Academy of Sciences.
Save Citation »Export Citation » Share Citation »
This report sets out broad trends in global health and explains how functional health systems support health, encourage prosperity, and advance global security. It proposes how foreign aid to low and middle-income countries could be most effective. One key conclusion is that supporting strong health infrastructure in low- and middle-income countries will improve health, but it will also have consequences beyond health to building a more resilient, stable, and prosperous world. Available online by free subscription.
Find this resource:
Bui, T., J. Evert, V. McCarthy, et al., eds. 2016. Reflection in global health: An anthology. San Francisco: Global Health Collaborations.
Save Citation »Export Citation » Share Citation »
A compilation of reflections on experiences from around sixty health science trainees and young doctors confronting both illness and injustice in health systems around the world. Does not use the term resilience, but gives examples of how health systems in different countries function in specific circumstances—some showing resilience, and others not.
Find this resource:
Commission on a Global Health Risk Framework for the Future. 2016. The neglected dimension of global security: A framework to counter infectious disease crises. Washington, DC: National Academies.
Save Citation »Export Citation » Share Citation »
Strengthening public health is the foundation of a resilient health system and first line of defense in pandemics. Building resilience is an ongoing commitment, not a one-off effort. Improving public health capabilities and resilience should be integral to governments’ fundamental duty to protect their peoples. Too many countries have not built their capacities as legally required by the 2005 International Health Regulations. This puts their populations at risk, as well as all humankind.
Find this resource:
Hallegatte, S., A. Vogt-Schilb, M. Bangalore, and J. Rozenberg. 2017. Unbreakable: Building the resilience of the poor in the face of natural disasters. Washington, DC: World Bank Group.
Save Citation »Export Citation » Share Citation »
This book has three main messages: (1) efforts to reduce poverty and disaster risks are complementary; (2) natural disasters affect well-being more than what traditional estimates suggest—disasters keep people in poverty; (3) policies that make people more resilient—and so better able to cope with and recover from the consequences of disasters that cannot be avoided—can save one hundred billion dollars a year. Maps, graphs, and diagrams show socioeconomic resilience, risks to well-being, and potential solutions.
Find this resource:
Hollnagel, E., and J. Braithwaite, eds. 2013. Resilient health care. Vol. 1. Farnham, UK: Ashgate.
Save Citation »Export Citation » Share Citation »
The focus here is clinical care and its context, and thus moves into health system components. Warns that clinical health care delivery is different from most other forms of production, and so finding solutions to issues of efficiency, quality, safety, and sustainability must take clinical and context complexities into account. Available online for purchase.
Find this resource:
Nicholson, A., M. R. Snair, and J. Hermann. 2016. Global health risk framework: Resilient and sustainable health systems to respond to global infectious disease outbreaks; Workshop summary. Papers presented at conferences on Global Health Risk Framework: Resilient and Sustainable Health Systems, held in Washington, DC, 2015. Washington, DC: National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine.
Save Citation »Export Citation » Share Citation »
This book has chapters on leadership and management; health system strengthening (workforce, supplies, and service delivery); information systems, technology, and information sharing; and strengthening outbreak management and emergency response. Each chapter starts with a set of key points. Case examples are presented in boxes. Has several interesting graphs and diagrams, and the book is perforated with poignant quotes. Requires free registration to access.
Find this resource:
Rodin, J. 2014. The resilience dividend introduction: Being strong in a world where things go wrong. New York: Public Affairs.
Save Citation »Export Citation » Share Citation »
This book consists mostly of a range of stories from around the world to show how people, organizations, businesses, communities, and cities have developed resilience in the face of otherwise catastrophic challenges. Poses a framework for resilient health systems characteristics: aware, diverse, integrated, self-regulating, and adaptive. P. 293 shows a diagram describing the resilience dividend and the resilience deficit. Introduction is available free online. Complete book can be purchased at low cost.
Find this resource:
Wears, R. L., E. Hollnagel, and J. Braithwaite, eds. 2015. Resilient health care. Vol. 2, The resilience of everyday clinical work. Farnham, UK: Ashgate.
Save Citation »Export Citation » Share Citation »
This is the second volume to Hollnagel and Braithwaite 2013. It contains contributions from international experts in health care, organizational studies, and patient safety as well as resilience engineering. Whereas many safety approaches primarily aim to reduce or eliminate the number of things that go wrong, Resilient Health Care aims to increase and improve the number of things that go right. Book has to be purchased.
Find this resource:
Books from the World Health Organization
World Health Organization 2000, World Health Organization 2007a, and World Health Organization 2016 are important texts on effective health systems functioning—necessary for resilience. World Health Report (World Health Organization 2000), on health system performance, has detailed chapters on health financing, human resources, and governance for protecting public interest. World Health Organization 2007a sets out a framework with six interconnected building blocks and four health system goals, including responsiveness, effectiveness, financial protection, and better health and equity. World Health Organization 2016 has a focus on universal health coverage with a specific section on health system resilience as one of five essential system attributes. Kickbusch and Gleicher 2012 makes a strong link between resilience and smart governance of health systems. World Health Organization 2017a highlights the role of public health law as another essential component for health system resilience. Formerly dealt with as part of health system governance, the pivotal role of law in health is now recognized more explicitly and receives more specific attention. The International Health Regulations (IHR) 2005 (World Health Organization 2007b) is an international legal framework outlining what countries are expected to do in order to protect national and global health security, including preparedness for disease outbreaks, natural disasters, and climate change. World Health Organization 2010 presents a regional action plan to assist countries in the Western Pacific Region to meet their legal obligations under the IHR. With the sustainable development goals as an overall interconnecting structure, World Health Organization 2017b uses the six health system building blocks in resilient health systems for child health care. It outlines prevention and mitigation of environmental hazards that threaten child health and well-being. World Health Organization 2017c presents risk profiles on natural disasters and communicable diseases for countries in the World Health Organization (WHO) South-East Asia Region.
Kickbusch, I., and D. Gleicher, eds. 2012. Governance for health in the 21st century. Copenhagen: World Health Organization.
Save Citation »Export Citation » Share Citation »
Governance is one of the six health system building blocks. This book explores issues of governance and changes in the modern world. It discusses in detail smart governance for health and well-being. Preserving and promoting system resilience is a fundamental characteristic of smart governance for health. Resilience is more than merely the ability to bounce back from systemic shocks to the old system. It includes the adaptive capacity of a system to evolve with the challenges in the most positive way.
Find this resource:
World Health Organization. 2000. The world health report, 2000: Health systems; Improving performance. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization.
Save Citation »Export Citation » Share Citation »
This is WHO’s early seminal work on health systems. It does not use the term resilient, but it does outline what is needed for sustainable and resilient health systems. Note the framework on p. 25. This is the forerunner of World Health Organization 2007 (cited under Frameworks), a framework of six health system building blocks.
Find this resource:
World Health Organization. 2007a. Everyone’s business: Strengthening health systems to improve health outcomes; Who framework for action. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization.
Save Citation »Export Citation » Share Citation »
A robust health system is a vital part of any governments’ response to avoid a vicious cycle of deteriorating health leading to deteriorating security. A health system framework is presented on p. 3, with two of the goals being social protection and health equity. Implications for countries include ensuring emergency preparedness and continuing services access for the poor and vulnerable; see also Runkle, et al. 2012, cited under Case Studies on Disasters and Extreme Weather Events.
Find this resource:
World Health Organization. 2007b. International Health Regulations (2005): Areas of work for implementation. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization.
Save Citation »Export Citation » Share Citation »
This is a legally binding framework with eight core competencies for countries to build national and global capacity to better respond to public health risks of international concern. Essential components include strong national public health systems able to maintain active surveillance of diseases and public health events, able to rapidly investigate reports, assess public health risk, share information, and implement public health control measures. This embodies the concept of resilience to be able to detect threats and keep functioning even when they occur.
Find this resource:
World Health Organization. 2010. Asia Pacific Strategy for Emerging Diseases, 2010. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization.
Save Citation »Export Citation » Share Citation »
Regional solidarity, resilience, and self-reliance are seen as key attributes needed to effectively deal with emerging diseases and other public health threats. This book provides a strategic guide for countries in the WHO Asia Pacific Regions to build competencies to strengthen their capacity to manage and respond to emerging disease threats and so contribute regional public health security as required by the 2005 International Health Regulations.
Find this resource:
World Health Organization. 2016. Universal health coverage: Moving towards better health. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization.
Save Citation »Export Citation » Share Citation »
This most recent of WHO’s publications on health systems moves beyond the six building blocks to consider what holds them together. The text outlines five essential mutually interdependent attributes that health systems need for universal health coverage: quality, efficiency, equity, accountability, and sustainability and resilience. Each attribute has key action domains with priority actions. Issues related to the six building blocks can be found throughout the sections on each attribute, with a summary table in Annex 1.
Find this resource:
World Health Organization. 2017a. Advancing the right to health: The vital role of law. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization.
Save Citation »Export Citation » Share Citation »
Information in this book can assist governments to reform their public health laws in order to advance the right to health. It highlights issues that may arise during public health law reform and provides guidance on requirements to be addressed in developing public health laws. It includes case studies and examples of legislation from a variety of countries to illustrate effective public health law reform practices. Law provides an essential framework for resilient health systems.
Find this resource:
World Health Organization. 2017b. Inheriting a sustainable world? Atlas on children’s health and the environment. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization.
Save Citation »Export Citation » Share Citation »
This book uses the sustainable development goals (SDGs) as an interconnecting structure to outline the wide range of community and health system resilience work needed to protect and improve children’s health. Increasing urbanization, industrialization, globalization, and climate change pose major environmental hazards to children and for their health. The many maps in the atlas allow easy understanding of global inequities on the indicators used to monitor progress on the SDGs and children’s health.
Find this resource:
World Health Organization. 2017c. Roots for resilience: A health emergency risk profile of the South-East Asia Region. New Delhi: World Health Organization.
Save Citation »Export Citation » Share Citation »
This book covers mainly natural disasters and communicable diseases. Snapshots of events are used to identify lessons. Analyzes hazards and risks against capacities and preparedness for each of the eleven countries in the region. Also assesses progress on universal health coverage. Provides risk maps for each disease hazard, with information on deaths and injuries 1900 to 2015. Finishes with a summary risk map and brief list of subnational, national, and regional actions to build resilience.
Find this resource:
Health System Strengthening
In the section on Books from the World Health Organization, we have general texts on well-functioning health systems, and in the section on Frameworks, we see that different authors see different components and attributes of resilience as important. The references included here are mostly studies or experiences in health system strengthening, showing changes in models of service delivery needed for future resilience. Coiera and Hovenga 2007 applies concepts of resilience in nature to a health system. A fundamental focus is on efficient use resources for effective functioning to meet health system objectives. De Savigny and Taghreed 2009 is based on extensive fieldwork in Tanzania, identifying practical interventions that local health managers can implement and that make a difference to system functioning. Health systems are complex, and Dickens 2013 is concerned with the requirements for system self-organization. He identifies principles of complex adaptive systems that support resilience. RESYST 2016 reinforces this based on district health systems research, with a list of factors essential for a resilient health system: system software includes knowledge, skills, and management, while system hardware includes finances, human resources, and infrastructure. This looks similar to the list in European Commission 2015 and the six health system building blocks in World Health Organization 2007, both mentioned in the section on Frameworks. World Economic Forum 2013, in considering scenarios for the future, identifies reducing demand for health care services as a critical approach to building resilience. It advocates for greater emphasis on health promotion and illness prevention. Recognizing the importance of health systems to program and service delivery, Global Fund 2015 outlines its approaches to health system strengthening to include: integrated service delivery, supply chain management, financial and risk management, and involving communities in national decision making. The frequency of medical errors in hospitals is frighteningly high. Carthey, et al. 2001 looks at resilience from the perspective of increasing patient safety and proposes a checklist to strengthen approaches to improve patient safety. Prowle and Harradine 2015 identifies that pressures causing increased demand for services in the face of reduced resources means that the arrangements of current health systems must adapt. But country populations tend to resist these changes, so there is an imperative to communicate the need for change in order to strengthen systems to be sustainable and resilient for the future. International Council of Nurses 2016 also comments on the need for different health system arrangements and explores the role of nurses in system strengthening and cross-sectoral work for resilience. Kruk, et al. 2017 proposes a set of indicators to measure health system resilience across five characteristics to help countries to assess readiness to cope with future shocks.
Carthey, J., M. R. de Leval, and J. T. Reason. 2001. Institutional resilience in healthcare systems. Quality in Health Care 10:29–32.
DOI: 10.1136/qhc.10.1.29Save Citation »Export Citation » Share Citation »
A perspective on health system resilience related to patient safety and adverse events. Presents a twenty-item checklist to assess institutional resilience. Considers the impact of commitment, competence, and cognizance on principles, policies, procedures, and practices. Examples of positive and negative indicators of institutional resilience are given. This assessment assists health-care workers and managers to gauge their institution’s intrinsic resistance to adverse events.
Find this resource:
Coiera, E., and E. J. Hovenga. 2007. Building a sustainable health system. Yearbook Medical Information 11–18.
Save Citation »Export Citation » Share Citation »
Outlines four conditions of sustainability in nature and applies these to managing health systems for sustainability, using a simple but effective diagram to show the sustainability gap. Efficient management of resources to meet objectives is fundamental. The role of information systems in supporting this is explored throughout the paper. Explicit effort is required to identify the sustainability weak points and to implement the health system policies, infrastructure, and services to ensure that in twenty years’ time we have a healthy, resilient health system.
Find this resource:
de Savigny, D., and A. Taghreed, eds. 2009. Systems thinking for health systems strengthening. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization.
Save Citation »Export Citation » Share Citation »
One hundred twelve pages. As with the World Health Report (World Health Organization 2000, cited under Books from the World Health Organization), refers to robust rather than resilient health systems. System thinking recognizes that every intervention, from the simplest to the most complex, has an effect on the overall system, and conversely, the overall system has an effect on every intervention. Outlines ten steps to health system thinking, based on extensive field experience in Tanzania. Working within this frame explicitly will increase the likelihood that health system strengthening investments and interventions will be effective.
Find this resource:
Dickens, P. M. 2013. Facilitating emergent change in a healthcare setting. Healthcare Management Forum 26.3: 116–126.
DOI: 10.1016/j.hcmf.2013.05.003Save Citation »Export Citation » Share Citation »
Adaptation is a key characteristic of resilience. Using the concept of complex adaptive systems, this article looks at how organizational adaptation emerges from within itself. Three enablers are interdependence of factors, such as a high level of employee engagement in experimentation within a safe-fail culture; collaborative decision making; and deliberative learning. The author offers an online survey to assess the presence of factors contributing to organizational resilience.
Find this resource:
Global Fund. 2015. The role of the global fund-supporting countries to build resilient and sustainable systems for health. Geneva, Switzerland: Global Fund.
Save Citation »Export Citation » Share Citation »
The Global Fund’s support to countries in building resilient and sustainable systems for health has seven main approaches: (1) support national health plans to control HIV, TB, and malaria; (2) support integrated service delivery; (3) support supply chain management, quality assurance, and financial and risk management; (4) capture and catalyze innovation; (5) Involve communities in national decision making; (6) Support countries to increase domestic financing for health; and (7) tailor investments to the country.
Find this resource:
International Council of Nurses. 2016. Nurses: A force for change; Improving health systems’ resilience. Geneva, Switzerland: International Council of Nurses.
Save Citation »Export Citation » Share Citation »
Using universal health coverage and the health-related sustainable development goals as context, examines the role of nurses in strengthening health system resilience locally, nationally, and globally. Presents clear definitions throughout the report, for example, on leadership, global public goods, and risk management. Examines the roles of health actors, institutions, and populations to prepare for and respond to crises; maintain core functions during crises; and reorganize afterward. Core concepts for resilience are flexibility, adaptability, and learning.
Find this resource:
Kruk, M. E., E. J. Ling, A. Bitton, et al. 2017. Building resilient health systems: A proposal for a resilience index. BMJ 357:j2323.
DOI: 10.1136/bmj.j2323Save Citation »Export Citation » Share Citation »
Uses the framework in Rodin 2014 (cited under Frameworks) of five resilience characteristics: aware, diverse, self-regulating, integrated, and adaptive. Each characteristic has several aims, and measures or indicators are suggested to help countries assess whether their health systems can reach these aims and withstand future shocks. The rationale for each indicator is provided.
Find this resource:
Prowle, M., and D. Harradine. 2015. Sustainable healthcare systems: International study. Glasgow: Association of Chartered Certified Accountants.
Save Citation »Export Citation » Share Citation »
Examines healthcare systems in eleven countries facing challenges of demographic, technological, and economic changes. Austerity measures, coupled with increasing demand for services, mean that current health system arrangements are unlikely to be sustainable in the longer term. Possible ways of dealing with the impact of these external drivers would require significant health system changes, but face much resistance from populations. Politicians and health professionals need to communicate the essential need for such changes in order to strengthen systems for the future.
Find this resource:
RESYST. 2016. What is everyday health system resilience and how might it be nurtured: Key findings. London: RESYST.
Save Citation »Export Citation » Share Citation »
Easy-to-understand two pages based on research and empirical literature on district health systems. It enumerates leadership, networks, relationships, resources, organizational structures, and processes as key elements in resilience. Also describes a range of strategies that health system managers employ that demonstrate system resilience.
Find this resource:
World Economic Forum. 2013. Sustainable health systems: Visions, strategies, critical uncertainties and scenarios; A report from the World Economic Forum. Geneva, Switzerland: World Economic Forum.
Save Citation »Export Citation » Share Citation »
A mind map on sustainable health systems is on p. 51. Three key scenarios are considered and described using interesting diagrams. Long-term sustainability, and thus resilience, will be achieved only by reducing and controlling demand for healthcare—through healthier living in healthier settings—in cities and countries.
Find this resource:
Subsystems in Health
Health systems are not individual systems, but rather complex interacting subsystems. Some writing on health system resilience focuses on one or more subsystems rather than the overall system. Lengnick-Hall, et al. 2011 is not health specific, but presents interesting information on human resources policies and management as a foundation for organizational resilience. Kutzin, et al. 2017 outlines steps and content for a coherent health financing strategy in support of universal health coverage. As with human resources, resilient financing is a critical subsystem for a resilient health system. Fiorini, et al. 2015 looks at resilience in telemedicine for psychotherapy services. Hafner, et al. 2017 uses systems thinking to consider resilience in a hospital pharmaceutical system. Ho, et al. 2016 describes a generic health system resilience framework and applies it to digital tools in health. Smith, et al. 2014 also looks at resilience in electronic systems in health with a view to safety and privacy of information. Martin-Moreno, et al. 2012 examines the imperative for maintaining preventive services in the face of financial austerity and decreasing health budgets.
Fiorini, R. A., P. de Giacomo, and L. L’Abate. 2015. Towards resilient telehealth support for clinical psychiatry and psychology: A strategic review. Studies in Health Technology and Informatics 213:275–278.
Save Citation »Export Citation » Share Citation »
Presents a strategic review and the main steps to develop and achieve application resilience and anti-fragility at system level, for diagnostic and therapeutic telepractice and telehealth support for psychotherapy services. Available online by subscription.
Find this resource:
Hafner, T., H. Walkowiak, D. Lee, and F. Aboagye-Nyame. 2017. Defining pharmaceutical systems strengthening: Concepts to enable measurement. Health Policy and Planning 32.4: 572–584.
Save Citation »Export Citation » Share Citation »
Presents results of a literature review examining the importance of subsystems, particularly the pharmaceutical system, in overall health system resilience. Uses systems thinking. Results, including definitions, frameworks, and assessment tools, are summarized in useful tables. A diagram shows linkages to other health system building blocks, health goals, and broader system and resilience context.
Find this resource:
Ho, K., N. al-Shorjabji, E. Brown, et al. 2016. Applying the resilient health system framework for universal health coverage. Studies in Health Technology and Informatics 231:54–62.
Save Citation »Export Citation » Share Citation »
The focus here is digital health. The framework they present is founded on leadership and governance, resources, and information, with an emphasis on dependable processes that generate and consume digital health information in a learning organization in order to meet population health needs and achieve universal health coverage.
Find this resource:
Kutzin, J., S. Witter, M. Jowett, and D. Bayarsaikhan. 2017. Developing a national health financing strategy: A reference guide. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization.
Save Citation »Export Citation » Share Citation »
Covers core financing functions: revenue raising, pooling, and purchasing services, along with benefit design, in order to progress toward universal health coverage as outlined in Sustainable Development Goal 3. Provides a flow diagram of steps to develop a health financing strategy, with background information, underlining concepts, and an indicative strategy outline. Includes major revenue sources and contribution mechanisms. Discusses issues of coherence, interconnectedness, and alignment with different aspects of the health system for resilience.
Find this resource:
Lengnick-Hall, C. A., T. E. Beck, and M. L. Lengnick-Hall. 2011. Developing a capacity for organizational resilience through strategic human resource management. Human Resource Management Review 21.3: 243–255.
DOI: 10.1016/j.hrmr.2010.07.001Save Citation »Export Citation » Share Citation »
Resilience is a multilevel collective attribute. Human resource (HR) policies, practices, and activities are the foundation and integrating mechanisms of an organization’s capacity for resilience. Resilience is an increasingly necessary competence for organizations that operate in rapidly changing environments. As building resilience capacity takes time, resilience needs to be developed before it is needed. Provides a summary table on HR system components for developing resilience capacity.
Find this resource:
Martin-Moreno, J. M., A. Anttila, L. von Karsa, J. L. Alfonso-Sanchez, and L. Gorgoj. 2012. Cancer screening and health system resilience: Keys to protecting and bolstering preventive services during a financial crisis. European Journal of Cancer 48.14: 2212–2218.
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2012.02.060Save Citation »Export Citation » Share Citation »
Provides an example of the health imperative for continuing preventive population-based services even when facing financial austerity. Resilience here involves maintaining priorities while adapting to lower funding streams. In this context of controlling and reducing public spending, it is useful to focus on increasing the value of services provided, rather than only decreasing their costs. Provides a summary table of aspects of cancer screening in each of the six World Health Organization 2007 (cited under Frameworks) health system building blocks.
Find this resource:
Smith, M. W., J. S. Ash, D. F. Sittig, and H. Singh. 2014. Resilient practices in maintaining safety of health information technologies. Journal of Cognitive Engineering and Decision Making 8.3: 265–282.
DOI: 10.1177/1555343414534242Save Citation »Export Citation » Share Citation »
As electronic systems become more widely used in health facilities, issues of privacy and safety of information must also be considered. Diligence is needed to achieve resilience. This study generated five categories of resilient practice related to electronic systems in health, covering risk awareness and forward-looking management of resources and monitoring systems in quality control processes.
Find this resource:
Antimicrobial Resistance
Millions of lives and trillions of dollars are at risk due to rising drug resistance in the coming decades if effective action is not taken comprehensively (O’Neill 2016). Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) occurs when microorganisms such as bacteria, viruses, parasites, and fungi change so that the drugs used to treat the infections they cause become ineffective. Work to control the urgent and terrible global threat from AMR involves input from agriculture, animal husbandry, fisheries, and health and pharmaceutical research and development. O’Neill 2016 reports on a UK-commissioned review of the risks and action required to stem the spread of AMR. Similar to World Health Organization 2015, key actions include raising public awareness globally, developing new drugs, using antimicrobials more sparingly in humans, and seriously reducing their use in animals and fisheries. Health system resilience is critical for infection control, appropriate drug use, and monitoring AMR, but this is not enough, as action across several sectors must also be implemented. Resilient heath systems must work with other sectors to support the necessary comprehensive controls. World Health Organization 2015 outlines detailed actions required to control AMR to be undertaken by countries, the World Health Organization (WHO) Secretariat, and partners. United States Agency for International Development 2016 outlines the agency’s work in controlling AMR across many countries through strengthening their health systems.
O’Neill, J. 2016. Tackling drug-resistant infections globally: Final report and recommendations. London: Wellcome Trust.
Save Citation »Export Citation » Share Citation »
Many of the urgent problems regarding the huge and troubling impact of continuing antimicrobial resistance (AMR) are economic. But two of the seven recommended interventions to reduce demand for antimicrobials are directly health system related: improve sanitation and prevent the spread of infection, and improve the number, pay, and recognition of people working in infectious diseases. This report details all nine recommended interventions with a series of interesting infographics, quotes, and summary tables.
Find this resource:
United States Agency for International Development. 2016. Combating antimicrobial resistance with stronger health systems. Arlington, VA: US Agency for International Development.
Save Citation »Export Citation » Share Citation »
This paper outlines the work of the US Agency for International Development in controlling the spread of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) by strengthening health systems in many countries. Activities include advocacy; supporting national AMR strategies and plans; raising awareness; working with partners to strengthen infection prevention and control, developing standard treatment guidelines and essential medicines lists, establishing drug and therapeutics committees, and strengthening regulatory control; and developing online and mHealth tools and improving health worker education.
Find this resource:
World Health Organization. 2015. Global action plan on antimicrobial resistance. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization.
Save Citation »Export Citation » Share Citation »
In this action plan, WHO sets out detailed actions for control of AMR, specific to its Member States, its own secretariat, and partners. Even though much action is required outside the health sector, health authorities worldwide have obligations for advocacy across sectors and for monitoring impacts on populations. This requires resilience in national health systems, particularly surveillance and laboratories capacity.
Find this resource:
Case Studies on Financial Shocks to Health Systems
The economic crisis of 2008 affected the health systems of many countries, both developed and developing. Also, continuous funding restrictions put ongoing stress on systems struggling to continue provision of services. Olafsdottir, et al. 2013 describes how good governance in the Icelandic health system fostered adaptation to the financial reductions they faced. Thomas, et al. 2013 compares health system functioning in Ireland against a set of indicators to assess different forms of resilience. Zhang, et al. 2014 takes a historical review of China’s health sector reforms and concludes that resilience was fostered by effective Ministry of Health leadership. Nyikuri, et al. 2015 looks at how primary health care managers provide services under a devolved system with continual lack of funds. National Health Service 2016 outlines how the United Kingdom is progressively moving some care away from hospitals to community and social care, aiming to meet the triple objectives of providing more care, better quality care, and a lower overall cost. Imison, et al. 2017 reviews these efforts in changing models of care in the United Kingdom and conclude that quality may be better, but cost savings are likely to be more elusive. Ammar, et al. 2016 describes functioning of the Lebanese health system during conflict and consequent resource constraints.
Ammar, W., O. Kdouh, R. Hammoud, et al. 2016. Health system resilience: Lebanon and the Syrian refugee crisis. Journal of Global Health 6.2: 020704.
DOI: 10.7189/jogh.06.020704Save Citation »Export Citation » Share Citation »
Used system input–process–output–outcome to assess resilience in the Lebanese health system. Examines human resources; financial and governance inputs; service delivery processes; and financial expenditure, morbidity, and mortality as well as prevention of disease outbreaks. Continued functioning, even with a large influx of refugees and financial restrictions, is attributed to four factors: networking, adequate infrastructure and sufficient supply of human resources for health, a comprehensive communicable disease response, and integration of refugee health care within the national health system rather than in camps.
Find this resource:
Imison, C., N. Curry, H. Holder, et al. 2017. Shifting the balance of care. London: Nuffield Trust.
Save Citation »Export Citation » Share Citation »
Examines the UK National Health Service (NHS) transformation plans to progressively move care out of hospitals to community and social care. See National Health Service 2016 in this section. There is potential to improve care quality and outcomes as well as some cost savings; but some initiatives may increase overall costs. The NHS will have to determine whether the moves are worthwhile, even if the anticipated savings are not made.
Find this resource:
National Health Service. 2016. New models of care: Vanguards—developing a blueprint for the future of NHS and care services. London: National Health Service.
Save Citation »Export Citation » Share Citation »
An example of the transformations in models of care that developed countries need to make in response to demographic changes, increasing demand for care and restricted funding. New models of care aim to progressively reduce hospital-related services and increase community and social care in an attempt to meet these conflicting objectives.
Find this resource:
Nyikuri, M., B. Tsofa, E. Barasa, P. Okoth, and S. Molyneux. 2015. Crises and resilience at the frontline—public health facility managers under devolution in a sub-county on the Kenyan coast. PLOS One 10.12: e0144768.
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0144768Save Citation »Export Citation » Share Citation »
Reports on research examining accountability, routines, challenges, and coping strategies among managers of primary health care clinics under a devolved system in Kenya. Resource constraints require adaptation to continue effective functioning, which is necessary for health system resilience and maintaining service delivery.
Find this resource:
Olafsdottir, A. E., P. Allotey, and D. D. Reidpath. 2013. A health system in economic crises: A case study from Iceland. Scandinavian Journal of Public Health 41.2: 198–205.
DOI: 10.1177/1403494812470038Save Citation »Export Citation » Share Citation »
Economic crises are a critical test of the resilience of a health system and can be reviewed. Governance practices influencing the health system in Iceland to adapt to financial reductions are examined so lessons can be learned. Good governance practices are essential where transparency (with sufficient information) and broad participation (with all stakeholders) support the health system to reorganize without causing increased stress, confusion, or anger.
Find this resource:
Thomas, S., C. Keegan, S. Barry, R. Layte, M. Jowett, and C. Normand. 2013. A framework for assessing health system resilience in an economic crisis: Ireland as a test case. BMC Health Services Research 13:450.
DOI: 10.1186/1472-6963-13-450Save Citation »Export Citation » Share Citation »
Assesses performance of the health system in Ireland after economic crisis in 2007 resulted in deep health cuts. Uses a set of indicators to assess three aspects of resilience: financial, adaptive, and transformatory resilience. Finds transformatory resilience hardest to measure.
Find this resource:
Zhang, X., G. Bloom, X. Xu, L. Chen, X. Liang, and S. J. Wolcott. 2014. Advancing the application of systems thinking in health: Managing rural China health system development in complex and dynamic contexts. Health Research Policy and Systems 12:44.
DOI: 10.1186/1478-4505-12-44Save Citation »Export Citation » Share Citation »
History in China shows the complex and political nature of the management of health system development and reform. The paper concludes that governments need to increase their capacity to analyze the health sector as a complex system and to explicitly actively manage change and adaptation processes. A major reason for the resilience of the health system and its ability to adapt to rapid economic and institutional change was the leadership of the Ministry in providing overall strategy guidance.
Find this resource:
Ebola
The Ebola virus disease outbreak in West Africa in 2014 demonstrated to the global community that weak health systems in countries far away can result in serious loss of life in many other countries as well as disruption of economies. This is why Cuffy 2015 and Kruk, et al. 2015 list resilient health systems as global public goods, and why there has been a proliferation of writing on these topics. But the question remains—what is a resilient health system? Because it is not clear or easy to define, different authors put forward different sets of characteristics. Kieny, et al. 2014 outlines the progress of the Ebola virus disease outbreak and contemplates, when with so much investment put into vertical programs in the affected countries, why were their health systems not adequate to cope with a basic response of infection control? Cuffy 2015 looks at some basic requirements for a resilient health system and outlines the specific gaps in the health systems of the Ebola affected countries. Kieny and Dovlo 2015 also defines a resilient health system and shows its importance to other sectors and general functioning of the economy. The authors specifically argue for the role of effective primary health care as a foundation for a resilient health system. Kruk, et al. 2015 also presents a framework of characteristics to describe a resilient health system and puts emphasis on coordination between the public health and care-delivery systems. Siekmans, et al. 2017 discusses specific actions health workers needed to take in order to continue with routine vaccination and other aspects of child health care while also implementing the touch and contact restrictions required for Ebola infection control. Martineau 2016 puts a strong emphasis on understanding the community and gaining their trust as a prerequisite for a resilient health system.
Cuffy, E. 2015. Never again: Building resilient health systems and learning from the Ebola crisis. Oxford: Oxfam International.
Save Citation »Export Citation » Share Citation »
Presents six foundations for resilient health systems (remarkably similar to the six health system building blocks in World Health Organization 2007, cited under Frameworks). Then shows what the gaps were in each of these six areas in the countries affected by Ebola. Argues that investing in resilient health systems is a global public good. Outlines specific recommendations for countries, governments, and development partners.
Find this resource:
Kieny, M. P., and D. Dovlo. 2015. Beyond Ebola: A new agenda for resilient health systems. Lancet 385.9963: 91–92.
DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)62479-XSave Citation »Export Citation » Share Citation »
Briefly describes how weak health systems permitted the spread of the Ebola virus in West Africa. Lessons learned are changing approaches in global health. As with Martineau 2016, highlights trust in the health sector among the community as a foundation for building resilience in health systems. Trust influences behavior and use of health services. Spread of Ebola, as with other infectious diseases, is largely about human behavior.
Find this resource:
Kieny, M. P., D. B. Evans, G. Schmets, and S. Kadandale. 2014. Health-system resilience: Reflections on the Ebola crisis in Western Africa. Bulletin of the World Health Organization 92.12: 850.
DOI: 10.2471/BLT.14.149278Save Citation »Export Citation » Share Citation »
Gives a brief history of the Ebola outbreak in Western Africa, which highlighted how an epidemic can proliferate rapidly and pose huge problems in the absence of a strong health system—one that is capable of a rapid and integrated response. Discusses how unbalanced investment in system development still leaves the system weak, rendering both the local population and the global community vulnerable.
Find this resource:
Kruk, M. E., M. Myers, S. T. Varpilah, and B. T. Dahn. 2015. What is a resilient health system? Lessons from Ebola. Lancet 385.9980: 1910–1912.
DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)60755-3Save Citation »Export Citation » Share Citation »
Health system resilience is a global public good. During crises, resilient health systems minimize mortality and mitigate adverse health consequences by providing care for the emergency, continuing routine health services, reducing fear, and hastening resumption of normal social and economic activity. Uses the framework in Rodin 2014 (cited under Frameworks) on resilient health systems: aware, diverse, self-regulating, integrated, and adaptive. Public health and health care delivery must work in close coordination.
Find this resource:
Martineau, F. P. 2016. People-centered health systems: Building more resilient health systems in the wake of the Ebola crisis. International Health 8.5: 307–309.
DOI: 10.1093/inthealth/ihw029Save Citation »Export Citation » Share Citation »
This article emphasizes the importance of local beliefs, relationships, and behaviors in relation to disease and use of health services. To be successful, health system strengthening needs to take these into consideration. Building the trustworthiness of health actors and addressing local priorities are critical. Expertise of anthropologists and social scientists are needed in epidemic responses and resilient health system development.
Find this resource:
Siekmans, K., S. Sohani, T. Boima, F. Koffa, L. Basil, and S. Laaziz. 2017. Community-based health care is an essential component of a resilient health system: Evidence from Ebola outbreak in Liberia. BMC Public Health 17.1: 84.
DOI: 10.1186/s12889-016-4012-ySave Citation »Export Citation » Share Citation »
Describes the use of community health workers in treatment of children with diarrhea and pneumonia during the Ebola outbreak. Uses a broad concept of health system. Notes some specific adaptations that community health workers and their supervisors had to take in consequence of the restrictions on movement and touching people that were needed to control spread of Ebola virus disease.
Find this resource:
Case Studies on Infectious Disease Shocks to Health Systems
The HIV/AIDS epidemic and the outbreak of Ebola virus disease placed great strains on already-weak health systems. These case studies identify various factors that influence health system resilience and are needed to further develop resilience to face future shocks. Maunder, et al. 2008 links health worker resilience to organizational resilience and culture, and compares differences in health worker stress during a severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) outbreak and influenza pandemic. McKenzie, et al. 2015 identifies that in Nigeria during the Ebola outbreak, activities on all six health system building blocks are needed to develop resilience, along with other factors such as good governance, community engagement, a minimum package of activities, monitoring, and accountability. Cancedda, et al. 2016 is written from the perspective of a nongovernmental organization (NGO) working with affected health facilities in Sierra Leone to deliver clinical care to Ebola patients and also maintain other routine services. The authors’ emphasis is on the health workforce, the importance of trust, community engagement, and the actions taken to strengthen the health system to continue providing services. Lembani, et al. 2014 looks at factors that support resilience, such as having options and flexibility, for example, in activities and allocation of staff and alternative drug supplies. Otu, et al. 2016 has a more specific focus on how mHealth tools can rapidly train health workers to cope with Ebola patients and do village visits for tracing people with symptoms in Cote d’Ivoire. Rockefeller Foundation 2016 uses three case studies in West Africa, Singapore, and United States of America, along with expert opinions to identify best practice in public health communication. Though they may not have all the capacity themselves, resilient health systems need to partner with those who can effectively reach the public for accurate and honest information sharing during disease outbreaks. Again, this highlights the importance of interconnectedness of systems for resilience.
Cancedda, C., S. M. Davis, K. L. Dierberg, et al. 2016. Strengthening health systems while responding to a health crisis: Lessons learned by a nongovernmental organization during the Ebola virus disease epidemic in Sierra Leone. Journal of Infectious Diseases 214.Suppl. 3: S153–S163.
DOI: 10.1093/infdis/jiw345Save Citation »Export Citation » Share Citation »
Written from the perspective of those providing clinical care to patients affected by Ebola virus disease. Leveraged local knowledge, trust, and bonds of solidarity to educate villages on the importance of identifying individuals with symptoms. Survivors of Ebola often experience lingering physical ailments, severe stigmatization, and economic marginalization. Goals included patient and staff safety, quality of basic health services, capacity building for health professionals, robust disease surveillance, and community mobilization.
Find this resource:
Lembani, M., H. de Pinho, P. Delobelle, C. Zarowsky, and A. Ager. 2014. Health system resilience: A system analysis; A case study of technical assistance to HIV services in Cote d’Ivoire in the context of civil unrest following the disputed presidential election of 2010. Liverpool, UK: ReBUILD Consortium.
Save Citation »Export Citation » Share Citation »
A case study to identify factors that support or undermine resilience. Three systemic features support observed outcomes: collateral pathways (alternative routes to achieve a desired goal), narrowed focus, and aligned motivational interests. Continuity of antiretroviral therapy increased during the crisis; coverage of other HIV services decreased but later rebounded. Factors fostering resilience included coordination and task shifting, flexibility in drug supplies, staff motivation and availability, service prioritization, and external support.
Find this resource:
Maunder, R. G., N. Peladeau, M. Leszcz, et al. 2008. Applying the lessons of SARS to pandemic influenza: An evidence-based approach to mitigating the stress experienced by healthcare workers. Canadian Journal of Public Health/Revue Canadienne de Sante Publique 99.6: 486–488.
Save Citation »Export Citation » Share Citation »
Discusses how a culture of organizational resilience can foster resilience in health workers. Decentralized decision making and a sense of organizational justice are important factors supporting resilience. The effort to build organizational and health worker resilience is beneficial in times of normal system functioning as well as during disease outbreaks or other emergencies. Available online by subscription.
Find this resource:
McKenzie, A., A. Abdulwahab, E. Sokpo, and J. W. Mecaskey. 2015. Building a resilient health system: Lessons from northern Nigeria. London: Institute of Development Studies.
Save Citation »Export Citation » Share Citation »
Based on two years’ experience during the Ebola outbreak, identifies what resilient health systems need, including interventions on all six health system building blocks; a plan with providers and the community to strengthen governance, policy dialogue, and political commitment; integrated services to reduce fragmentation; clarification and delivery of a minimum package of services; regular monitoring; and sharing information widely with stakeholders.
Find this resource:
Otu, A., B. Ebenso, O. Okuzu, and E. Osifo-Dawodu. 2016. Using a mHealth tutorial application to change knowledge and attitude of frontline health workers to Ebola virus disease in Nigeria: A before-and-after study. Human Resources for Health 14:5.
Save Citation »Export Citation » Share Citation »
Report on an operational research study on the use of mHealth tools to improve health worker training in a setting of Ebola virus disease. Modest improvements were reported.
Find this resource:
Rockefeller Foundation. 2016. Effective public health communication in an interconnected world: Enhancing resilience to health crises. Bellagio, Italy: Rockefeller Foundation Bellagio Center.
Save Citation »Export Citation » Share Citation »
Includes case studies on the 2013–2015 Ebola crisis in West Africa, the SARS epidemic of 2003 in Singapore, and the 2015 Legionnaires’ disease outbreak in New York City. Identifies best practice principles and approaches to using all forms of communication media, including the Internet and social media platforms. A resilient health system needs partnerships with effective communication and community engagement organizations.
Find this resource:
Climate Change and Health Systems
Climate resilience was the most frequent topic in resilient conversations on Twitter in 2015 (Lovell, et al. 2016, cited under Global Risks). In the health sector, in addition to emerging diseases such as Ebola virus disease and Mediterranean Respiratory Syndrome, much discussion on health system resilience is related to climate change. Extreme weather events have become more frequent and severe, for example, heat waves, droughts, cyclones, snowstorms, and floods (Keim 2008). All these impact individual and population health. Persistent increases in global temperature result in widening the ranges of vector-borne communicable diseases. World Economic Forum 2015, World Economic Forum 2016, and World Economic Forum 2017 (all cited under Global Risks) list top-ten risks that the world is facing in terms of likelihood and impact. Climate change and its consequences feature prominently, including disruptions to individual and population health. All parts of the health system have a role in reducing human vulnerability to climate change. Her Majesty’s Government 2011 provides statements of priority on building infrastructure resilience to climate across nine sectors including health. James and Friel 2015 emphasizes the interconnectedness of systems, for example, health services need the electricity system for power, the transport system for supplies, the telephone system for communications, agriculture for food, etc., and thus the imperative for cross-sectoral planning and preparation for adaption to climate change and emergency preparedness and response. Whorley 2015 notes increasingly combined consideration of ecological, engineering, and evolutionary resilience in adapting and preparing built infrastructure to withstand environmental onslaughts. Panic and Ford 2013 identifies a range of inadequacies in fourteen Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) countries regarding their planning for health system adaptation to climate change, including inadequate consideration of the needs of vulnerable groups. Ebi, et al. 2016 sees climate change as an issue of social justice, human rights, and equity. As in so many situations, the most vulnerable are the worst affected, and thus there is obligation on the health system to plan for protecting services to meet their needs.
Ebi, K. L., S. B. Fawcett, J. Spiegel, and H. Tovalin. 2016. Carbon pollution increases health inequities: Lessons in resilience from the most vulnerable. Revista Panamericana de Salud Publica 40.3: 181–185.
Save Citation »Export Citation » Share Citation »
Argues that climate change is a humanitarian and social justice issue as much as an environmental issue. Climate resilience needs to be proactively built into health system strengthening and should focus on the needs of the most vulnerable. Gives brief examples of country actions and progress, for example, in Bhutan, China, Indonesia, Ecuador, and the Caribbean.
Find this resource:
Her Majesty’s Government. 2011. Climate resilient infrastructure: Preparing for a changing climate. London: Her Majesty’s Stationary Office.
Save Citation »Export Citation » Share Citation »
Health is one of nine sectors covered by this UK government document. Increasing infrastructure’s resilience to climate change impacts is a high priority. Outlines government and private sector roles. Gives examples of adaptation successes and discusses challenges to achieving climate change–resilient infrastructure.
Find this resource:
James, S. W., and S. Friel. 2015. An integrated approach to identifying and characterizing resilient urban food systems to promote population health in a changing climate. Public Health Nutrition 18.13: 2498–2508.
DOI: 10.1017/S1368980015000610Save Citation »Export Citation » Share Citation »
This paper discusses the interconnected nature of systems, and that to improve environmental sustainability, equity, and population health outcomes, action should focus on the system as a whole and not just on only one sector or part. Looks at issues on access to healthy foods from the perspectives of producers and consumers.
Find this resource:
Keim, M. E. 2008. Building human resilience: The role of public health preparedness and response as an adaptation to climate change. American Journal of Preventive Medicine 35.5: 508–516.
DOI: 10.1016/j.amepre.2008.08.022Save Citation »Export Citation » Share Citation »
Global climate change will increase the probability of extreme weather events, including heat waves, drought, wildfire, cyclones, and heavy precipitation that result in increased health needs that can exceed local capacity to respond. Human vulnerability to any disaster is a complex phenomenon with social, economic, health, and cultural dimensions. Emergency preparedness, response, and recovery increase disaster resilience. This article discusses the role of local public health agencies in reducing human vulnerability and building resilience at community level to respond to climate change. Available online by subscription.
Find this resource:
Panic, M., and J. D. Ford. 2013. A review of national-level adaptation planning with regards to the risks posed by climate change on infectious diseases in 14 OECD nations. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 10.12: 7083–7109.
DOI: 10.3390/ijerph10127083Save Citation »Export Citation » Share Citation »
Climate change will alter the incidence, prevalence, and distribution of infectious diseases spread by mosquitos, ticks, water, and food. This paper presents analysis of health system planning and preparation for these changes across fourteen OECD countries. Shortcomings identified include insufficient attention to local risks, the needs of vulnerable groups, and implementation logistics. Recommends public health adaptations. Advises that adaptation through mainstreaming supports integration of climate change considerations into ongoing policy processes.
Find this resource:
Whorley, F. 2015. Building resilience: A framework assessing costs and benefits of resilient design strategies. Perkins+Will Research Journal 7.1.
Save Citation »Export Citation » Share Citation »
This thirteen-page booklet on resilience designing describes a study and evidence for the benefits of design strategies for office buildings and hospitals to mitigate the impact of climate change and extreme weather events. It concludes that resilient design offers many tangible and intangible benefits, though they are difficult to quantify in terms of cost.
Find this resource:
Extreme Weather Events and Other Disasters
Related to climate change in general, there has been an increase in writing on extreme weather events and other disasters, both natural and caused by human activity. Ben Yahmed and Koob 1996 outlines an early World Health Organization (WHO) approach to building community resilience to reduce vulnerability to disasters. Castleden, et al. 2011 notes that disaster resilience and community resilience are often used interchangeably. In addition to looking at the survivability of infrastructure and utilities, the authors comment that public trust and social cohesion are important factors in our “ideal view” of community resilience to disasters (note also Kieny and Dovlo 2015 and Martineau 2016 on trust, both cited under the section on Ebola). Bayntun 2012 presents results of a literature review that appear to indicate that few health facilities use a comprehensive or holistic approach to disaster management. This is further echoed in Rodriguez and Aguirre 2006, noting a lack of hospital resilience after hurricane Katrina and the need for hospitals to work with their communities on their disaster planning. Interconnectedness of systems, an interlacing thread throughout this article, is again highlighted in O’Sullivan, et al. 2013. In addition, the authors underscore the need for forward thinking and open communication to prepare for and manage dynamic, complex disaster situations. Paturas, et al. 2010 also advises hospitals to work with their communities on their disaster surge plans and necessary service adjustments. Similarly, Takahashi, et al. 2015 underscores the role of schools as a community refuge and resource during disasters. Rockenschaub and Harbou 2013 encourages planning on the whole disaster management cycle, including prevention, mitigation, preparedness, response, and after-disaster recovery. When resources are limited for prevention, mitigation, and preparedness, inevitably more resources are required later for response and recovery. Elmer and Lurie 2011 notes that when rebuilding after disasters, a similar level of investment needs to go into social and community capital, as goes into infrastructure, so that community resilience can contribute to and support health system resilience.
Bayntun, C. 2012. A health system approach to all-hazards disaster management: A systematic review. PLOS Currents Disasters 4:e50081cad55861d.
Save Citation »Export Citation » Share Citation »
Presents a systematic literature review to collate experiences of disaster management by components of a health system. Of the 143 disaster management documents found, none described a holistic health system approach to disaster management, and none evaluated such an approach. Thus, the results of this 2012 review indicate that a holistic health system approach to disaster management has not yet been established in practice.
Find this resource:
Ben Yahmed, S., and P. Koob. 1996. Health sector approach to vulnerability reduction and emergency preparedness. World Health Statistics Quarterly: Rapport Trimestriel de Statistiques Sanitaires Mondiales 49.3–4: 172–178.
Save Citation »Export Citation » Share Citation »
This early WHO article discusses increasing community resilience to decrease disaster vulnerability. Poses that the concept of vulnerability has two aspects, susceptibility and resilience. Vulnerability reduction decreases susceptibility, increases resilience, and protects human development. Vulnerability reduction is the responsibility of all sectors, including health. Concerned that diverting aid from development to emergency response reduces efforts to build community resilience. Refers to the need for suitable indicators to monitor vulnerability reduction. Electronic version not currently available.
Find this resource:
Castleden, M., M. McKee, V. Murray, and G. Leonardi. 2011. Resilience thinking in health protection. Journal of Public Health 33.3: 369–377.
DOI: 10.1093/pubmed/fdr027Save Citation »Export Citation » Share Citation »
Community and disaster resilience are often used synonymously, describing a community’s intrinsic capacity to resist and recover from a disturbance. Includes components such as fault tolerance of power, water, and communications systems; the survivability of buildings, bridges, and other physical infrastructure; organizational preparedness and good governance; and less tangible but important factors such as public trust and social cohesiveness. These components contribute to a normative ideal of community resilience to potential disasters.
Find this resource:
Elmer, S., and N. Lurie. 2011. The missing piece meets the Big O: Disaster mental health recovery and community resilience. Ethnicity and Disease 21.3 Suppl. 1: S1-5–S1-7.
Save Citation »Export Citation » Share Citation »
Resilience involves rebuilding communities after disasters to be better than they were before. To achieve this, there needs to be investment in human capital on an equal basis with investment in physical infrastructure.
Find this resource:
O’Sullivan, T. L., C. E. Kuziemsky, D. Toal-Sullivan, and W. Corneil. 2013. Unraveling the complexities of disaster management: A framework for critical social infrastructure to promote population health and resilience. Social Science and Medicine 93:238–246.
DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2012.07.040Save Citation »Export Citation » Share Citation »
Highlights the interdependencies between health and other social systems to promote health and resilience. Crises usually cross sector boundaries. Population health and resilience requires sector collaboration for adequate surge capacity and effective communication when infrastructure is disrupted. Study results underscore the need for thinking ahead, for organizations to dismantle silos, and for creating functional linkages to manage the dynamic context during a disaster. Available online by subscription.
Find this resource:
Paturas, J. L., D. Smith, S. Smith, and J. Albanese. 2010. Collective response to public health emergencies and large-scale disasters: Putting hospitals at the core of community resilience. Journal of Business Continuity & Emergency Planning 4.3: 286–295.
Save Citation »Export Citation » Share Citation »
Emphasizes the broader role of hospitals in emergency response beyond medical care, including a location for survivors to get food, water, shelter, and information on disaster impact or further likely dangerous events; tracing missing people; and a communications hub in coordination with local services such as schools. Hospitals have to plan community wide, to be ready to quickly adapt normal routine to surge response and reallocate staff to achieve all necessary roles. Available online by subscription.
Find this resource:
Rockenschaub, G., and K. V. Harbou. 2013. Disaster resilient hospitals: An essential for all-hazards emergency preparedness. World Hospitals and Health Services 49.4: 28–30.
Save Citation »Export Citation » Share Citation »
This three-page article briefly introduces WHO tools on emergency preparedness and management and provides an overview of their implementation in countries of the WHO European Region. Thinking needs to move from prioritizing reactive emergency response toward a more comprehensive emergency risk management approach. Thinking and preparation needs to consider all parts of the disaster management cycle encompassing prevention, mitigation, preparedness, response, and recovery. Available online by subscription.
Find this resource:
Rodriguez, H., and B. E. Aguirre. 2006. Hurricane Katrina and the healthcare infrastructure: A focus on disaster preparedness, response, and resiliency. Frontiers of Health Services Management 23.1: 13–23.
DOI: 10.1097/01974520-200607000-00003Save Citation »Export Citation » Share Citation »
The aftermath of Hurricane Katrina in 2005 exposed a lack of resilience of hospitals when their transport and supply lines were broken, challenging their ability to provide key services. In looking at communities affected by Katrina, the authors identify lessons for the future. Planning, access to supplies and utilities, communication plans, and training health workers are essential in developing resilient healthcare infrastructure capable to provide needed services to communities affected by future disasters. See discussion on pages 25–30. Available online by subscription.
Find this resource:
Takahashi, K., M. Kodama, E. R. Gregorio, et al. 2015. School health: An essential strategy in promoting community resilience and preparedness for natural disasters. Global Health Action 8:29106.
DOI: 10.3402/gha.v8.29106Save Citation »Export Citation » Share Citation »
Aims to emphasize the importance of schools in reducing damage and trauma in disasters. Before disasters, schools are places of community education, organization, supply storage, and practice. During and after disasters, schools are landmarks, places of evacuation and refuge, centers of rescue and communication. Schools and their local communities can work together to build capacity for disaster preparedness and response.
Find this resource:
Case Studies on Disasters and Extreme Weather Events
One of the impacts of climate change is an increase in the number and severity of extreme weather events. Countries and their health systems have to cope with the impact of these as well as other natural and man-made disasters. Based on the author’s experience after the 2011 tsunami in Japan, Kuroda 2011 emphasizes the importance of resilience in patient health information systems. Runkle, et al. 2012 describes primary and secondary surges in need for care after a chlorine spill in South Carolina—a technological disaster. Sea level rise and increased storms with flooding are leaving their impact on communities and health systems. National Center for Disaster Preparedness 2012 presents a series of papers on lessons from the 2012 Hurricane Sandy in the southern United States. Cash, et al. 2013 describes how in Bangladesh, public health activities have also helped reduce the impact of storms and floods. Secretariat for the South Pacific 2015 synthesizes forty case studies on adaptation to climate change in Pacific Island countries that are at serious risk of sea level rise. Natuzzi, et al. 2016 takes lessons from the 2014 floods in Solomon Islands.
Cash, R. A., S. R. Halder, M. Husain, et al. 2013. Reducing the health effect of natural hazards in Bangladesh. Lancet 382.9910: 2094–2103.
DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)61948-0Save Citation »Export Citation » Share Citation »
Key messages cover progress over forty years, improved public health, and new challenges of climate change. A positive cycle is demonstrated: overall population health improved greatly on the basis of successful public health activities, which also helped to mitigate the effects of natural disasters.
Find this resource:
Kuroda, H. 2011. Health care response to the tsunami in Taro District, Miyako City, Iwate Prefecture. Western Pacific Surveillance and Response Journal 2.4: 14–24.
Save Citation »Export Citation » Share Citation »
One doctor’s experience of running a medical service after the 11 March 2011 tsunami and earthquake on the northeast coast of Japan. Loss of the medical center, all equipment, supplies, and patient information were major problems. Gradually, supplies and equipment were salvaged or provided and the services were reestablished, but it was much more difficult to regain information on patient health needs. Highlights the importance of disaster-resilient health facilities, community capacity, and advocacy/awareness for disaster preparation and response.
Find this resource:
National Center for Disaster Preparedness. 2012. After Hurricane Sandy: Lessons learned for bolstering the resilience of health systems and services; Read ahead materials. Papers presented at a conference held at Columbia University, 3 December 2013. New York: Columbia University.
Save Citation »Export Citation » Share Citation »
A series of background papers for a conference on lessons learned after Hurricane Sandy that hit the Caribbean Sea and New Orleans area in the southern United States in October 2012. The fifteen papers cover issues including communication, coordination, and authority; uncertainty, forward planning, and inter-facility drills; data needs for planning and response; mass casualty preparedness; special needs for people with mobility problems; and research priorities.
Find this resource:
Natuzzi, E. S., C. Joshua, M. Shortus, et al. 2016. Defining population health vulnerability following an extreme weather event in an urban Pacific island environment: Honiara, Solomon Islands. American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 95.2: 307–314.
DOI: 10.4269/ajtmh.16-0177Save Citation »Export Citation » Share Citation »
Uses lessons from 2014 floods in Solomon Islands. Understanding the negative impacts of flooding on people and the health system in urban Pacific environments will help governments and development partners in designing resilient adaptations and new developments.
Find this resource:
Runkle, J. D., H. Zhang, W. Karmaus, A. B. Martin, and E. R. Svendsen. 2012. Prediction of unmet primary care needs for the medically vulnerable post-disaster: An interrupted time-series analysis of health system responses. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 9.10: 3384–3397.
DOI: 10.3390/ijerph9103384Save Citation »Export Citation » Share Citation »
A health system in underserved areas can prove resilient and display improved adaptive capacity during technological disasters to ensure access to primary care for vulnerable groups. Examines the 2005 chlorine spill in Graniteville, South Carolina, on primary care access during the primary and secondary surges in care needs during and after the chlorine spill. Highlights the need to anticipate and prepare for secondary surges in care needs.
Find this resource:
Secretariat for the South Pacific. 2015. Compendium of case studies on climate and disaster resilient development in the pacific. Suva, Fiji: Secretariat for the South Pacific.
Save Citation »Export Citation » Share Citation »
Presents forty case studies on projects and programs across the Pacific Islands that address climate- and disaster-related challenges to build resilience. Among key lessons identified is that complex systems need multi-sectoral and comprehensive approaches. Another is that activities to improve water, food, and health security also help to raise broader community resilience to climate and disaster risks.
Find this resource:
Resilience Toolkits and Toolkit Reviews
There are an increasing number of toolkits being developed to guide health facility workers and managers on preparing for climate change, extreme weather, pandemics, and other disasters by building system resilience. The Canadian Coalition for Green Health Care and the U.S. Climate Resilient Toolkit are web-based toolkits to help health-care facilities to build their resilience to climate change and extreme weather events. UK Cabinet Office 2011 provides a general sector guide to strengthening infrastructure such as buildings, power, transport, supply, and communication systems to cope during all forms of disaster. Commonwealth Secretariat 2017 outlines a plan and assessment tool to help Commonwealth countries with developing policies for health protection. Chase 2013 presents the World Health Organization’s toolkit: “A Model Policy for SMART Health Facilities, Safe+Green=Smart.” Balbus, et al. 2016 compares these three toolkits (United States, Canadian, and World Health Organization) providing succinct comparison tables on several features, and further identifies attributes important for sustainability and resilience. The tool presented in Matthiessen, et al. 2009 outlines seven areas where health facilities can take action to reduce their own massive carbon footprint. A theme throughout many resilience resources is the interdependence of systems and subsystems, both natural and man-made. Baker 2011 presents a guide relevant to all sectors and encourages cross-sectoral planning for resilience and incident or disaster response. Sorensen, et al. 2011 provides a checklist that accounts for all types of hazards, organized by nine components. This toolkit also provides lists of additional resources for each of the nine components. Shumake-Guillemot 2015 is a World Health Organization guide on ten key components that health authorities and programs can implement to anticipate, prevent, prepare for, and manage climate-related health risks.
Baker, M. 2011. Regional disaster resilience: A guide for developing an action plan, 2011 edition. Alexandria, VA: The Infrastructure Security Partnership.
Save Citation »Export Citation » Share Citation »
Not specific to health but emphasizes interdependency of systems, for example, energy, telecommunications, transportation, water and water treatment systems, and banking and finance; emergency services; healthcare and public health, agriculture and food, postal and shipping, etc. This guide describes a step-by-step process that can be customized to develop a cross-sector, multijurisdictional strategy to deal with any major incident or disaster.
Find this resource:
Balbus, J., P. Berry, M. Brettle, et al. 2016. Enhancing the sustainability and climate resiliency of health care facilities: A comparison of initiatives and toolkits. Revista Panamericana de Salud Publica 40.3: 174–180.
Save Citation »Export Citation » Share Citation »
This paper compares three toolkits: the Canadian Health Care Facility Climate Change Resiliency Toolkit, the US Sustainable and Climate Resilient Health Care Facilities Toolkit, and the WHO SMART Hospitals Toolkit. Factors critical to resiliency enhancements are identified: availability of cost-benefit analyses and business case statements, importance of the process, ensuring skilled health-care workers, building sustainability into disaster preparedness, adapting toolkits to local needs, and health facilities as community refuges during disasters.
Find this resource:
Cabinet Office. 2011. Keeping the country running: Natural hazards and infrastructure; A guide to improving the resilience of critical infrastructure and essential services. London: Cabinet Office.
Save Citation »Export Citation » Share Citation »
Health is one of nine sectors covered in this guide on reducing infrastructure vulnerability to terrorism, cyber attacks, major accidents, and natural hazards. The guide outlines the principles for infrastructure resilience and provides advice and practical information on risk assessment for natural hazards, standards for resilience infrastructure, governance, and regulation.
Find this resource:
Canadian Coalition for Green Health Care. Health care facility climate change resiliency toolkit.
Save Citation »Export Citation » Share Citation »
The webpage of this toolkit has three main documents: (1) a presentation guide for facilitators and managers starting to look at adaptations for their facilities; (2) a facility assessment checklist; and (3) a resource guide providing more information about climate change, health care, and resiliency. The webpage also has tabs for events, news, resources, and organizations.
Find this resource:
Canadian Coalition for Green Health Care. 2013. Preparing health care facilities for climate change: Resource guide. Branchton, Canada: Canadian Coalition for Green Health Care.
Save Citation »Export Citation » Share Citation »
Provides summaries and references for a wide range of accessible resources on topics, including emergency management, supply chain management, health services, facilities management, and infrastructure.
Find this resource:
Chase, V. 2013. A model policy for SMART health facilities. New York: World Health Organization.
Save Citation »Export Citation » Share Citation »
A practical guide for hospital administrators, health disaster coordinators, health facility designers, engineers, and maintenance staff to achieve Smart Health Facilities by conserving resources, cutting costs, increasing efficiency in operations, and reducing carbon emissions. Summarizes impact of several extreme weather events to identify lessons. Explains concepts in the framework “Safe+Green=Smart.”
Find this resource:
Commonwealth Secretariat. 2017. Health protection policy toolkit: Health as an essential component of global security. 2d ed. London: Commonwealth Secretariat.
Save Citation »Export Citation » Share Citation »
Uses the Sustainable Development Goals, International Heath Regulations, and Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction as context for this policy guide for Commonwealth member states. Summarizes global health security threats. Presents a framework diagram on health system policy and briefly defines all terms used. Lists a ten-point plan for developing policies on health protection, and then provides a detailed assessment tool covering requirements to implement the plan. Finishes with a table of related resources and websites.
Find this resource:
Matthiessen, C., J. Karliner, J. Atkinson, et al. 2009. Healthy hospitals, healthy planet, healthy people: Addressing climate change in health care settings. New York: World Health Organization.
Save Citation »Export Citation » Share Citation »
Provision of health-care services is a massive energy-intensive activity, also consuming large quantities of food, water, drugs, and other resources, creating a very large carbon footprint. This guide provides examples and actions for seven elements of a climate-friendly hospital: energy efficiency, green building design, alternative energy generation, transportation, water, food, and waste.
Find this resource:
Shumake-Guillemot, J. 2015. Operational framework for building climate resilient health systems. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization.
Save Citation »Export Citation » Share Citation »
This guide is for health systems and public health managers to increase capacity for protecting health in an unstable and changing climate. By implementing the ten key framework components, health organizations, authorities, and programs will be better able to anticipate, prevent, prepare for, and manage climate-related health risks. A summary of the main expected health impacts of climate change is on p. 3. The ten framework components for building climate resilient health systems are linked to the six health system building blocks, p. 12.
Find this resource:
Sorensen, B. S., R. D. Zane, B. E. Wante, M. B. Rao, M. Bortolin, and G. Rockenschaub. 2011. Hospital emergency response checklist: An all-hazards tool for hospital administrators and emergency managers. Copenhagen: World Health Organization.
Save Citation »Export Citation » Share Citation »
Provides a checklist for all-hazards priority action required for a rapid, effective response to a critical event. Covering practical aspects of nine components: command and control, communication, safety and security, triage, surge capacity, continuity of essential services, human resources, logistics and supply management, and post-disaster recovery. Also provides a list of selected tools and guidelines for each component.
Find this resource:
United States Government. U.S. climate resilient toolkit.
Save Citation »Export Citation » Share Citation »
This web-based toolkit includes a best practices document, a framework describing affordable measures and tools that can help make health-care facilities more resilient, case studies, and additional resources for responding to challenges associated with the impacts of climate change.
Find this resource:
Article
- Abortion
- Access to Health Care
- Action Research
- Active Aging
- Active Living
- Addiction
- Adolescent Health, Socioeconomic Inequalities in
- Adolescent Risk-Taking Behavior in the United States
- Advocacy, Public Health
- Agricultural Safety and Public Health
- Air Quality: Health Effects
- Air Quality: Indoor Health Effects
- Alcohol Availability and Violence
- Alternative Research Designs
- Ambient Air Quality Standards and Guidelines
- American Perspectives on Chronic Disease and Control
- Antimicrobial Resistance (AMR)
- Arts in Health
- Asbestos
- Asthma in Children
- Asthma, Work-Related
- Attachment as a Health Determinant
- Behavior
- Behavior Change Theory in Health Education and Promotion
- Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance
- Bicycling and Cycling Safety
- Bioethics
- Birth and Death Registration
- Birth Cohort Studies
- Board of Health
- Breastfeeding
- Built Environment and Health, The
- Business and Corporate Practices
- Cancer Communication Strategies in North America
- Cancer Prevention
- Cancer Screening
- Capacity Building
- Capacity Building for NCDs in LMICs
- Capacity-Building for Applied Public Health in LMIC: A US ...
- Cardiovascular Health and Disease
- Child Labor
- Child Maltreatment
- Children, Air Pollution and
- Children, Injury Risk-Taking Behaviors in
- Children, Obesity in
- Citizen Advisory Boards
- Climate Change and Human Health
- Climate Change: Institutional Response
- Clinical Preventive Medicine
- Community Air Pollution
- Community Development
- Community Gardens
- Community Health Assessment
- Community Health Interventions
- Community Partnerships and Coalitions
- Community-Based Participatory Research
- Complexity and Systems Theory
- Critical Health Literacy
- Cultural Safety
- Culture and Public Health
- Definition of Health
- Dental Public Health
- Design and Health
- Dietary Guidelines
- Directions in Global Public Health Graduate Education
- Driving and Public Health
- Ecological Approaches
- Enabling Factors
- Environmental Health, Pediatric
- Environmental Laws
- Environmental Protection Agency
- Ethics of Public Health
- Evidence-Based Pediatric Dentistry
- Evidence-Based Public Health Practice
- Family Planning Services and Birth Control
- Food Safety
- Food Security and Food Banks
- Food Systems
- Frail Elderly
- Functional Literacy
- Genomics, Public Health
- Geographic Information Systems
- Geography and Health
- Global Health
- Global Health Diplomacy
- Global Health Promotion
- Global Health Security
- Guide to Community Preventive Services, The
- Health Administration
- Health Communication
- Health Disparities
- Health Education
- Health Impact Assessment
- Health in All Policies
- Health in All Policies in European Countries
- Health Literacy
- Health Literacy and Non-Communicable Diseases
- Health Measurement Scales
- Health Planning
- Health Promoting Hospitals
- Health Promotion
- Health Promotion Foundations
- Health Promotion Workforce Capacity
- Health Promotion Workforce Capacity
- Health Systems of Low and Middle-Income Countries, The
- Healthy People Initiative
- Healthy Public Policy
- Hepatitis C
- High Risk Prevention Strategies
- Homelessness
- Human Rights, Health and
- Human Sexuality and Sexual Health: A Western Perspective
- IANPHI and National Public Health Institutes
- Immigrant Populations
- Immunization and Pneumococcal Infection
- Immunization in Pregnancy
- Indigenous Peoples, Public Health and
- Indigenous Populations of North America, Australasia, and ...
- Indoor Air Quality Guidelines
- Inequities
- Infant Mortality
- Internet Applications in Promoting Health Behavior
- Intersectoral Action
- Intersectoral Strategies in Low - Middle Income Countries ...
- Justice, Social
- Knowledge Translation and Exchange
- Knowledge Utilization and Exchange
- Law of Public Health in the United States
- Media Advocacy
- Mental Health
- Mental Health Promotion
- Migrant Health
- Migrant Worker Health
- Motor Vehicle Injury Prevention
- Multi-Drug-Resistant Tuberculosis
- Nanotechnology
- National Association of Local Boards of Health
- National Public Health Institutions
- Needs Assessment
- Needs Assessments in International Disasters and Emergenci...
- Obesity Prevention
- Occupational Cancers
- Occupational Exposure to Benzene
- Occupational Exposure to Erionite
- Occupational Safety and Health
- Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA)
- Oral Health Equity for Minority Populations in the United ...
- Ottawa Charter
- Parenting and Work
- Parenting Skills and Capacity
- Participatory Action Research
- Patient Decision Making
- Pesticide Exposure and Pesticide Health Effects
- Pesticides
- Physical Activity and Exercise
- Physical Activity Promotion
- Pneumoconiosis
- Polio Eradication in Pakistan
- Population Aging
- Population Determinants of Unhealthy Foods and Beverages
- Population Health Objectives and Targets
- Precautionary Principle
- Prenatal Health
- Preparedness
- Program Evaluation in American Health Education
- Program Planning and Evaluation
- Public Health, History of
- Public Health Surveillance
- Public-Private Partnerships in Public Health Research and ...
- Public-Private Partnerships to Prevent and Manage Obesity ...
- Quantitative Microbial Risk Assessment
- Racism as a Structural Determinant of Health
- Radiological and Nuclear Emergencies
- Randomized Controlled Trials
- Real World Evaluation Strategies
- Reducing Obesity-Related Health Disparities in Hispanic an...
- Research Integrity in Public Health
- Resilient Health Systems
- Rural Health in the United States
- Safety, Patient
- School Health Programs in the Pacific Region
- Sex Education in HIV/AIDS Prevention
- Silicosis
- Skin Cancer Prevention
- Smoking Cessation
- Social Determinants of Health
- Social Epidemiology
- Social Marketing
- Statistics in Public Health
- STI Networks, Patterns, and Control Strategies
- Stillbirths
- Suicide
- Sustainable Development Goals
- Systems in the United States, Public Health
- Systems Modeling and Big Data for Non-Communicable Disease...
- Systems Theory in Public Health
- Traditional, Complementary, Alternative, and Integrative M...
- Translation of Science to Practice and Policy
- Traumatic Stress and Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder
- Tuberculosis among Adults and the Determinants of Health
- UK Public Health Systems
- Unintentional Injury Prevention
- Urban Health
- Vaccination, Mandatory
- Vaccine Hesitancy
- Vermiculite
- Violence Prevention
- War
- Water Quality
- Water Quality and Water-Related Disease
- Weight Management in US Occupational Settings
- Welfare States, Public Health and Health Inequalities
- Workforce
- Worksite Health Promotion
- World Health Organization (WHO)