International Relations Environmental Peacebuilding
by
Tobias Ide
  • LAST MODIFIED: 26 August 2020
  • DOI: 10.1093/obo/9780199743292-0290

Introduction

Interest in the environmental dimensions of peacebuilding has emerged from the early 2000s onward due to two developments. First, with an increasing number of peacebuilding interventions by the international community and nongovernmental organizations (NGOs), addressing environmental issues in post-conflict contexts has become a major concern. This is especially so as water and land are crucial for (re-)building livelihoods while modern wars produce considerable environmental damage. Second, an increasing number of scholars and policymakers are expressing concerns about the security implications of global environmental change, with the impact of climate change on violent conflict being a particularly salient topic. A focus on environmental cooperation and its potential peace-enhancing effects provides a complementary analytical perspective that can counter determinist and securitizing environmental conflict narratives. Environmental peacebuilding can be broadly defined as efforts to build more peaceful relations through conflict prevention, resolution, and recovery processes that integrate the management of environmental issues. In this context, peace refers to negative peace (the absence of physical violence) as well as positive peace (the absence of structural violence and the inconceivability of physical violence). Environmental peacebuilding can take place at the macro level (e.g., between states) as well as on the meso level and the micro level (e.g., between or within local communities). Environmental peacebuilding includes four sets of practices (which are not mutually exclusive): First, with resources like water or land becoming increasingly scarce in some regions and oil or mining projects often being heavily contested, preventing conflicts over natural resources is increasingly important. Second, in post-conflict contexts, natural resources must be managed well, for instance to reduce land-related grievances or prevent conflict financing through resource revenues. Third, climate change mitigation, adaptation to environmental change, and disaster risk reduction (DRR) can reduce grievances and promote community coherence. Finally, joint and severe environmental problems can act as entry points for cooperation across political divides, hence supporting processes of trust building and deepening interdependence (the respective set of practices is often termed environmental peacemaking). These practices can also fail, however, implying that they have no impact on environmental problems or peace processes. In the worst case, environmental peacebuilding practices can even facilitate new forms of exclusion, conflict, and environmental degradation. Over the past two decades, interest in environmental peacebuilding has grown remarkably, not at least due to the intensification of environmental problems and recent trends toward a less peaceful world. As a result of these developments, the literature on environmental peacebuilding has grown dramatically.

General Overviews

In comparison to the environmental security or climate conflict fields, relatively few overviews on environmental peacebuilding are available. The best way to stay up to date is to follow the homepage of the Environmental Peacebuilding Association, which contains comprehensive and current information on the field. Dresse, et al. 2019 as well as Ide 2019 are, to date, the only review articles on environmental peacebuilding. Both provide good introductions to the state of the art of the research field. An edited volume, Swain and Öjendal 2018 covers various core topics and regional case studies. A brief and forward-looking critique of the state of knowledge is articulated in Krampe 2017.

Fundamental Works

Early works on the topic often conceived environmental peacebuilding as a necessary addition to or even an approach competing with dominant environmental conflict perspectives. Conca 2001 is the first solid theoretical treatment of environmental peacebuilding but lacks empirical evidence. Conca and Dabelko 2002 introduces the concept of environmental peacemaking, laying the foundation for the field of environmental peacebuilding and also providing some first case studies. The articles in Matthew, et al. 2002 are fundamental for debates about environmental conflict prevention. Using transnational peace parks as an example, Lejano 2006 develops a formal theoretical model of environmental peacebuilding. Carius 2006 uses a broad set of cases to bring to the fore new conceptual and empirical insights. An edited volume, Ali 2007 advances the research field significantly by developing fresh conceptual insights and empirical evidence on peace parks, that is, conservation cooperation to enhance international relations. The report commissioned by the United Nations Environmental Programme (UNEP) (Matthew, et al. 2009) as well as the review of UNEP’s post-conflict assessments (Conca and Wallance 2009) set the stage for research on environmental peacebuilding in post-conflict (and usually post–civil war) contexts.

Journals

No journal is as yet specifically dedicated to environmental peacebuilding. However, several periodicals are well known for carrying forward general debates on environmental security, including on environmental peacebuilding. Global Environmental Change is a highly ranked, interdisciplinary journal open to a broad range of ontological, theoretical, and methodical approaches. Political Geography has also published high-quality work from a range of different fields, mostly in geography and political science. Geoforum usually features research that is grounded in critical geographical research, while World Development is more geared toward development research. The Journal of Peace Research is a leading international relations outlet with a preference for quantitative and mix-methods research. Cooperation and Conflict is well known for publishing excellent work on peacebuilding, including its environmental dimensions. Global Environmental Politics also contains works relevant for environmental peacebuilding from a broad range of fields in political science. International Affairs is a prestigious international relations journal currently expanding its content on environmental peacebuilding.

Edited Volumes

Conca and Dabelko 2002 have laid the foundation for environmental peacebuilding research. Swain and Öjendal 2018 provides a recent overview about various regions and core topics. Between 2011 and 2016, the Environmental Peacebuilding Initiative (now Environmental Peacebuilding Association) published six edited volumes on environmental peacebuilding, containing a wide range of case studies in conflict and post-conflict contexts with significant input from practitioners: Lujala and Rustad 2012 (on high-value resources); Jensen and Lonergan 2012 (on environmental assessments and resource management); Unruh and Williams 2013 (on land); Weinthal, et al. 2014 (on water); Young and Goldman 2015 (on livelihoods); and Bruch, et al. 2016 (on governance). All six volumes can be downloaded free of charge from the association’s homepage.

Quantitative Studies

While quantitative studies are common in related fields like environmental security or climate change and conflict, so far very few cross-case, statistical analyses of large numbers of cases in environmental peacebuilding research have appeared. Such studies are crucial in testing the conceptual and empirical insights from early environmental peacebuilding research for a broader set of cases. Barquet, et al. 2014 (for some regions) as well as Ide and Detges 2018 find a positive impact of transboundary conservation and international water cooperation on the relations between neighboring states. Ide 2018 confirms their results by showing how environmental cooperation can facilitate the relaxation of international tensions. Other quantitative studies do not explicitly refer to environmental peacebuilding, but they still provide relevant insights, especially on post-conflict settings. Blattman and Annan 2016 focuses on the role of agriculture in reducing the risk of civil war reoccurrence. Keels and Mason 2019 finds that the provision of land reforms in peace agreements reduces the risk of peace failure. Mitchell and Zawahri 2015 identifies features of international river treaties that make cooperation and conflict prevention more likely. According to Linke, et al. 2015, dialogue between communities during droughts decreases the readiness to use violence in Kenya.

  • Barquet, Karina, Päivi Lujala, and Jan Ketil Rød. “Transboundary Conservation and Militarized Interstate Disputes.” Political Geography 42.1 (2014): 1–11.

    Save Citation »Export Citation »E-mail Citation »

    The first quantitative study on the topic in which the authors use advanced statistics to disentangle the interlinkages between interstate disputes and transboundary conversation cooperation.

    Find this resource:

  • Blattman, Christopher, and Jeannie Annan. “Can Employment Reduce Lawlessness and Rebellion? A Field Experiment with High-Risk Men in a Fragile State.” American Political Science Review 110.1 (2016): 1–17.

    Save Citation »Export Citation »E-mail Citation »

    A comprehensive investigation of agricultural support programs for ex-combatants in Liberia.

    Find this resource:

  • Ide, Tobias. “Does Environmental Peacemaking between States Work? Insights on Cooperative Environmental Agreements and Reconciliation in International Rivalries.” Journal of Peace Research 55.3 (2018): 351–365.

    Save Citation »Export Citation »E-mail Citation »

    A multi-method study in which the author uses statistics, qualitative comparative analysis (QCA), and case studies to analyze the impact of environmental cooperation on international rivalries.

    Find this resource:

  • Ide, Tobias, and Adrien Detges. “International Water Cooperation and Environmental Peacemaking.” Global Environmental Politics 18.4 (2018): 63–84.

    Save Citation »Export Citation »E-mail Citation »

    Using advanced statistics, the authors find that water cooperation contributes to positive peace in shared river basins.

    Find this resource:

  • Keels, Erik, and T. David Mason. “Seeds of Peace? Land Reform and Civil War Recurrence Following Negotiated Settlements.” Cooperation and Conflict 54.1 (2019): 44–63.

    Save Citation »Export Citation »E-mail Citation »

    A study of land-related provisions in peace agreements and civil war reoccurrence. It is important for, but unfortunately does not relate to the environmental peacebuilding literature.

    Find this resource:

  • Linke, Andrew M., John O’Loughlin, J. Terrence McCabe, Jaroslav Tir, and Frank D. W. Witmer. “Rainfall Variability and Violence in Rural Kenya: Investigating the Effects of Drought and the Role of Local Institutions with Survey Data.” Global Environmental Change 34.1 (2015): 35–47.

    Save Citation »Export Citation »E-mail Citation »

    The authors use an innovative survey-based research design to disentangle the links among rainfall, resource scarcity, and conflict in Kenya.

    Find this resource:

  • Mitchell, Sara McLaughlin, and Neda A. Zawahri. “The Effectiveness of Treaty Design in Addressing Water Disputes.” Journal of Peace Research 52.2 (2015): 187–200.

    Save Citation »Export Citation »E-mail Citation »

    Contributes to wider debates about water conflict and environmental peacebuilding by assessing which characteristics of water treaties reduce the risk of international water conflict.

    Find this resource:

Case Studies

Case studies are the currently dominant method in environmental peacebuilding research. They are important to test existing theoretical propositions, advance our conceptual understanding, and provide research-based insights to practitioners.

Cases Studies on the Middle East

The Middle East is by far the most well-studied region in environmental peacebuilding research. Reasons for this might include the geopolitical relevance of the region, predominant water scarcity, the abundance of conflicts, and the relatively easy access to many countries for researchers. Harari and Roseman 2008 introduces the perhaps best-known case of environmental peacebuilding, the Good Water Neighbors (GWN) project of EcoPeace (formerly known as Friends of the Earth Middle East) in Israel, Jordan, and Palestine. Ide 2017 and especially Djernaes, et al. 2015 discuss GWN rather positively, while Reynolds 2017 provides a more critical perspective. The Red Sea–Dead Sea Canal is another environmental peacebuilding initiative between these three countries but suffers from various shortcomings, as shown in Aggestam and Sundell 2016 as well as in Fischhendler and Tenenboim-Weinblatt 2019. Other Israeli-Palestinian projects are stronger, led by civil society actors. Roulin, et al. 2017 discusses bird conservation, and Schoenfeld, et al. 2014 treats environmental education in this context. For other examples in the Middle East, the focus remains on interstate relations. Abukhater 2013 provides an excellent discussion of water issues during the Israeli-Jordanian peace negotiations in the early 1990s, and Sümer 2014 outlines the multiple relationships between water and peace in the Euphrates-Tigris Basin.

Case Studies on Africa

Africa is the most studied region in the wider environmental security literature and has also received considerable attention by environmental peacebuilding scholars. Some of these studies make only brief or implicit links to environmental peacebuilding debates, yet they still provide important insights. Critical perspectives on conservation and peace parks feature prominently in this literature, as demonstrated in Duffy 2006, King and Wilcox 2008, Ramutsindela 2017, and van Amerom and Büscher 2005. Bhatasara, et al. 2013 provides a more positive assessment of peace parks in southern Africa. Martin, et al. 2011 analyze the oscillations between cooperation and conflict in the Virunga region in East Africa, hence gaining wider theoretical insights for environmental security research. Going beyond a focus on conservation, Tignino 2016 and Turton 2003 assess transboundary water cooperation and its (potential) positive effects on wider international relations. Focusing on the intrastate level, Johnson 2019 shows how strong environmental governance can fuel conflict and undermine peacebuilding efforts. In a similar vein, Beevers 2019 provides a detailed discussion of natural resource governance in post-insurgency Liberia and Sierra Leone.

  • Beevers, Michael. Peacebuilding and Natural Resource Governance after Armed Conflict: Sierra Leone and Liberia. London: Palgrave, 2019.

    Save Citation »Export Citation »E-mail Citation »

    A detailed case study on resource governance and peacebuilding in Liberia and Sierra Leone that speaks to a wide range of debates on environmental peacebuilding.

    Find this resource:

  • Bhatasara, Sandra, Admire M. Nyamwanza, and Krasposy Kujinga. “Transfrontier Parks and Development in Southern Africa: The Case of the Great Limpopo Transfrontier Park.” Development Southern Africa 30.4–5 (2013): 629–639.

    Save Citation »Export Citation »E-mail Citation »

    A rather positive assessment of the Great Limpopo Transfrontier Park in southern Africa.

    Find this resource:

  • Duffy, Rosaleen. “The Potential and Pitfalls of Global Environmental Governance: The Politics of Transfrontier Conservation Areas in Southern Africa.” Political Geography 25.1 (2006): 89–112.

    Save Citation »Export Citation »E-mail Citation »

    The author highlights that international conservation efforts face serious implementation problems and might even have a negative effect on peace.

    Find this resource:

  • Johnson, McKenzie F. “Strong (Green) Institutions in Weak States: Environmental Governance and Human (in)Security in the Global South.” World Development 122.1 (2019): 433–445.

    Save Citation »Export Citation »E-mail Citation »

    An in-depth study of Ghana and Sierra Leone showing how transnational environmental governance can result in local exclusions and conflict.

    Find this resource:

  • King, Brian E., and Sharon Wilcox. “Peace Parks and Jaguar Trails: Transboundary Conservation in a Globalizing World.” GeoJournal 71.4 (2008): 221–231.

    Save Citation »Export Citation »E-mail Citation »

    A comparative assessment of South Africa and North America warning of depoliticization and neoliberalization through transboundary conservation.

    Find this resource:

  • Martin, Adrian, Eugene Rutagarama, Ana Elisa Cascão, Maryke Gray, and Vasudha Chhotray. “Understanding the Co-existence of Conflict and Cooperation: Transboundary Ecosystem Management in the Virunga Massif.” Journal of Peace Research 48.5 (2011): 621–635.

    Save Citation »Export Citation »E-mail Citation »

    A theoretically convincing case study of conservation cooperation among the Democratic Republic of Congo, Rwanda, and Uganda.

    Find this resource:

  • Ramutsindela, Maano. “Greening Africa’s Borderlands: The Symbiotic Politics of Land and Borders in Peace Parks.” Political Geography 56.1 (2017): 106–113.

    Save Citation »Export Citation »E-mail Citation »

    A critical political ecology perspective on peace parks and border construction.

    Find this resource:

  • Tignino, Mara. “Joint Infrastructure and the Sharing of Benefits in the Senegal and Niger Watersheds.” Water International 41.6 (2016): 835–850.

    Save Citation »Export Citation »E-mail Citation »

    The author analyzes the contexts, dynamics, and consequences of water-related cooperation along the Niger and Senegal Rivers.

    Find this resource:

  • Turton, Anthony. “The Hydropolitical Dynamics of Cooperation in Southern Africa: A Strategic Perspective on Institutional Development in International River Basins.” In Transboundary Rivers, Sovereignty and Development: Hydropolitical Drivers in the Okavango River Basin. Edited by Anthony Turton, Peter Ashton, and Eugene Cloete, 83–103. Pretoria, South Africa: African Water Issues Research Unit, 2003.

    Save Citation »Export Citation »E-mail Citation »

    An overview about transboundary water cooperation in southern Africa with a focus on the Okavango River.

    Find this resource:

  • van Amerom, Marloes, and Bram Büscher. “Peace Parks in Southern Africa: Bringers of an African Renaissance?” Journal of Modern African Studies 43.2 (2005): 159–182.

    Save Citation »Export Citation »E-mail Citation »

    A critical assessment of peace parks in the context of the concept of an African Renaissance.

    Find this resource:

Case Studies on Other World Regions

In line with the earlier focus of the literature on interstate relations, more case studies exist on international environmental peacebuilding. Cabada and Waisova 2018 are the first to discuss environmental peacebuilding in East Asia. Huda and Ali 2018 analyze energy-related cooperation in South Asia. Regarding Latin America, Barquet 2015 (on Costa Rica and Nicaragua) and Walters 2012 (on Bolivia and Peru) provide detailed insights. But especially since 2011, the number of high-quality cases studies in post-conflict and especially post–civil war settings is growing. Zawahri 2011 shows how India stabilized the situation in Punjab after the partition through changing land tenure and building hydrological infrastructure. Akçalı and Antonsich 2009, by contrast, finds that environmental topics are too low profile to contribute to peacebuilding in Cyprus. Reflecting earlier concerns about depoliticization and local irrelevance, Krampe 2016 (for Kosovo) and Krampe and Gignoux 2018 (for East Timor) also remain sceptical about environmental peacebuilding after civil war.

  • Akçalı, Emel, and Marco Antonsich. ““Nature Knows No Boundaries”: A Critical Reading of UNDP Environmental Peacemaking in Cyprus.” Annals of the Association of American Geographers 99.5 (2009): 940–947.

    Save Citation »Export Citation »E-mail Citation »

    The authors discuss several reasons why the success of environmental peacebuilding in Cyprus has been limited.

    Find this resource:

  • Barquet, Karina. “‘Yes to Peace’? Environmental Peacemaking and Transboundary Conservation in Central America.” Geoforum 63.1 (2015): 14–24.

    Save Citation »Export Citation »E-mail Citation »

    A critical analysis of the Si-A-Paz (“Yes to Peace”) transboundary protected area between Costa Rica and Nicaragua.

    Find this resource:

  • Cabada, Ladislav, and Sarka Waisova. “Environmental Cooperation as the Instrument of Conflict Transformation in East Asia.” Journal of Comparative Politics 11.2 (2018): 4–17.

    Save Citation »Export Citation »E-mail Citation »

    A comparative study of environmental peacebuilding between China and Taiwan, the two Koreas, and Cambodia and Thailand.

    Find this resource:

  • Huda, Mirza Sadaqat, and Saleem H. Ali. “Environmental Peacebuilding in South Asia: Establishing Consensus on Hydroelectric Projects in the Ganges-Brahmaputra-Meghna (GBM) Basin.” Geoforum 96.1 (2018): 160–171.

    Save Citation »Export Citation »E-mail Citation »

    A fine study on energy and environmental peacebuilding with a focus on the Ganges-Brahmaputra-Meghna Basin.

    Find this resource:

  • Krampe, Florian. “Water for Peace? Post-conflict Water Resource Management in Kosovo.” Cooperation and Conflict 52.2 (2016): 147–165.

    Save Citation »Export Citation »E-mail Citation »

    This article provides an excellent example of how environmental peacebuilding can fail if deeper lying political fault lines on the ground are not considered.

    Find this resource:

  • Krampe, Florian, and Suzanne Gignoux. “Water Service Provision and Peacebuilding in East Timor: Exploring the Socioecological Determinants for Sustaining Peace.” Journal of Intervention and Statebuilding 12.2 (2018): 185–207.

    Save Citation »Export Citation »E-mail Citation »

    A broad discussion of water and post-conflict peacebuilding in East Timor.

    Find this resource:

  • Walters, Todd J. “Environmental Peace-Building in Peru and Bolivia: The Collaboration Framework for Lago De Titicaca.” In Parks, Peace, and Partnership: Global Initiatives in Transboundary Collaboration. Edited by Michael S. Quinn, Len Broberg, and Wayne Freimund, 135–154. Calgary, BC: University of Calgary Press, 2012.

    Save Citation »Export Citation »E-mail Citation »

    The authors in this longitudinal study analyze in detail why water cooperation between Bolivia and Peru could facilitate improved relations between both states during some time periods, but not others.

    Find this resource:

  • Zawahri, Neda A. “Using Freshwater Resources to Rehabilitate Refugees and Build Transboundary Cooperation.” Water International 36.2 (2011): 167–177.

    Save Citation »Export Citation »E-mail Citation »

    An excellent study on land and water in post-partition Punjab.

    Find this resource:

Case-Based Insights from Other Fields

Environmental peacebuilding is a young and highly interdisciplinary research field. Consequentially, case studies from neighboring fields like environmental conflict, natural resource management, and development studies can greatly enrich our understanding of the topic. Several such excellent contributions exist that do not refer to environmental peacebuilding explicitly. Bogale and Korf 2007; Adano, et al. 2012; and Bukari, et al. 2018 all provide examples of how pastoralists and farmers in sub-Saharan Africa cooperate in the face of drought, and how such cooperation might contribute to peace. Taher, et al. 2012 and Lichtenthäler 2014 draw similar conclusion for water scarcity in conflict-ridden parts of Yemen. Using within-case comparisons, Tubi and Feitelson 2016 make an important contribution by disentangling the factors enabling Bedouin-Jewish cooperation during the 1957–1963 drought in southern Israel. Castro 2018 demonstrates that even in highly illiberal and violent settings, natural resource management and conflict resolution is possible. Johnson 2019, by contrast, shows that internationally supported environmental governance can reconfigure local power relations, hence leading to new inequalities and conflicts. Relevant insights on international projects are provided in Scheumann and Shamaly 2016 (on the Syrian-Turkish Friendship Dam) and Zikos, et al. 2015 (on bi-communal water infrastructure on the divided island of Cyprus).

  • Adano, Wario, Ton Dietz, Karen M. Witsenburg, and Fred Zaal. “Climate Change, Violent Conflict and Local Institutions in Kenya’s Drylands.” Journal of Peace Research 49.1 (2012): 65–80.

    Save Citation »Export Citation »E-mail Citation »

    An important study from the climate-conflict literature showing how drought can induce cooperation rather than conflict.

    Find this resource:

  • Bogale, Ayalneh, and Benedikt Korf. “To Share or Not to Share? (Non-)Violence, Scarcity and Resource Access in Somali Region, Ethiopia.” Journal of Development Studies 43.4 (2007): 743–765.

    Save Citation »Export Citation »E-mail Citation »

    The authors provide an insightful analysis of farmer-herder cooperation under drought in a conflict-prone region.

    Find this resource:

  • Bukari, Kaderi Noagah, Papa Sow, and Jürgen Scheffran. “Cooperation and Co-existence between Farmers and Herders in the Midst of Violent Farmer-Herder Conflicts in Ghana.” African Studies Review 61.2 (2018): 78–102.

    Save Citation »Export Citation »E-mail Citation »

    Brings theories of cultural neighborhood and everyday peace to the study of farmer-herder cooperation and conflict.

    Find this resource:

  • Castro, A. Peter. “Promoting Natural Resource Conflict Management in an Illiberal Setting: Experiences from Central Darfur, Sudan.” World Development 109.1 (2018): 163–171.

    Save Citation »Export Citation »E-mail Citation »

    A rich analysis of resource management and peacebuilding that deliberately decides not to engage with environmental peacebuilding debates.

    Find this resource:

  • Johnson, McKenzie F. “Strong (Green) Institutions in Weak States: Environmental Governance and Human (In)Security in the Global South.” World Development 122.1 (2019): 433–445.

    Save Citation »Export Citation »E-mail Citation »

    Based on in-depth field research, the author demonstrates how strong environmental governance can undermine peace and human security in Ghana and Sierra Leone.

    Find this resource:

  • Lichtenthäler, Gerhard. “Customary Conflict Resolution in Times of Extreme Water Stress: A Case Study of a Document from the Northern Highlands of Yemen.” In Why Yemen Matters: A Society in Transition. Edited by Helen Lackner, 183–196. London: Saqi, 2014.

    Save Citation »Export Citation »E-mail Citation »

    This study shows convincingly how even in contexts of violent conflict and severe water scarcity, local communities can initiate cooperation over shared water resources.

    Find this resource:

  • Scheumann, Waltina, and Omar Shamaly. “The Turkish-Syrian Friendship Dam on the Orontes River: Benefits for All?” In Water Resources Management in the Lower Asi-Orontes River Basin: Issues and Opportunities. Edited by Aysegül Kibaroglu and Ronald Jaubert, 125–137. Geneva, Switzerland: Graduate Institute of International and Development Studies, 2016.

    Save Citation »Export Citation »E-mail Citation »

    An exemplary discussion on the interlinkages between interstate relations, in general, and water-related interactions, in particular.

    Find this resource:

  • Taher, Taha, Bryan Bruns, Omar Bamaga, Adel Al-Weshali, and Frank van Steenbergen. “Local Groundwater Governance in Yemen: Building on Traditions and Enabling Communities to Craft New Rules.” Hydrogeology Journal 20.6 (2012): 1177–1188.

    Save Citation »Export Citation »E-mail Citation »

    Another example of how groundwater scarcity in Yemen sets incentives for cooperation rather than conflict between local communities.

    Find this resource:

  • Tubi, Amit, and Eran Feitelson. “Drought and Cooperation in a Conflict Prone Area: Bedouin Herders and Jewish Farmers in Israel’s Northern Negev, 1957–1963.” Political Geography 51.1 (2016): 30–42.

    Save Citation »Export Citation »E-mail Citation »

    The authors develop a simple, yet convincing, framework that can explain the presence or absence of cooperation over drought impacts in a set of similar cases.

    Find this resource:

  • Zikos, Dimitrios, Alevgul H. Sorman, and Marissa Lau. “Beyond Water Security: Asecuritisation and Identity in Cyprus.” International Environmental Agreements 15.3 (2015): 309–326.

    Save Citation »Export Citation »E-mail Citation »

    This study builds on securitization theory to illustrate the peace dividends of water cooperation between Greek and Turkish communities on Cyprus.

    Find this resource:

Peace Parks

The study of conservation areas intended to improve relations between parties in conflict—so called peace parks—is a vital subfield of environmental peacebuilding. While many of its insights apply to environmental peacebuilding in general, studies of peace parks also recognize the particularities of their research object, such as a lower political relevance of conservation compared to water or energy. Notable is the focus of peace parks research on transboundary conservation areas, while intrastate cases are rarely considered. Brock 1991 is a fundamental article on peace parks that precedes the environmental peacebuilding literature by a decade. Lejano 2006 (cited under Fundamental Works) is a milestone in terms of theory development. But it is the edited volume Ali 2007 that has set the stage for future research efforts by providing advanced theoretical and empirical insights. Cross-case studies like Barquet, et al. 2014 as well as Ide 2018 indeed find evidence that transboundary conservation cooperation facilitate less violent international relations in some world regions. But authors of works such as Duffy 2002 show that peace parks might also serve to extend state control and marginalize local inhabitants. Especially with regard to southern Africa, controversies have arisen between critics of peace parks, in works such as van Amerom and Büscher 2005, and those with a more positive attitude, in works such as Bhatasara, et al. 2013. Mjelde, et al. 2017 enrich the literature by analyzing a case in East Asia, and Mackelworth 2012 provides the only study on maritime peace parks so far.

Critical Perspectives

Critical perspectives have emerged in environmental peacebuilding research early on. Drawing on constructivist, Marxist, or political ecology approaches as well as case-based (usually field) research, the respective authors highlight how environmental cooperation might be unsustainable and deeply conflictive. Duffy 2002 and Duffy 2006 are the first studies developing an explicitly critical perspective on peace parks as a tool of state control. Ide 2020 provides a comprehensive summary of the potential negative effects of environmental peacebuilding. Excellent regional case studies can be found in Barquet 2015 (on Central America), Ramutsindela 2017 (on southern Africa), and Reynolds 2017 (on Israel and Palestine). All three accounts highlight, among others, how environmental peacebuilding is tied to business interests and new forms of exclusion. Also focusing on the Middle East, Aggestam and Sundell 2016 discusses how environmental peacebuilding facilitates the depoliticization of underlying conflicts.

Areas of Application

Environmental peacebuilding is still a young and comparatively small field, and so as yet little work has been done on particular aspects, or areas of application, of the topic. Most studies take a cross-topic approach when focusing on, for instance, the impact of environmental cooperation on interstate relations or natural resource management in post–civil war contexts. However, topic wise, Bruch, et al. 2020 focuses on the judicial aspects of environmental peacebuilding, while Ide and Tubi 2020 takes an education perspective. Similarly, Huda and Ali 2018 focuses heavily on energy; Griffin and Ali 2014 on wetlands; and Jama, et al. 2020 on the role of civil society. A groundbreaking book, Kelman 2012 studies how disaster-related cooperation can contribute to better relations between groups or states (disaster diplomacy). Kyrou 2007 aims to further the research field by developing a peace ecology perspective based on broader understandings of environment, peace, and science.

  • Bruch, Carl, Erika Weinthal, and Jessica Troell. “Water Law and Governance in Post-conflict Settings.” In Special Issue: Water Protection and Armed Conflicts in International Law. Edited by Mara Tignino and Britta Sjöstedt. Review of European, Comparative & International Environmental Law 29.1 (2020): 7–20.

    DOI: 10.1111/reel.12319Save Citation »Export Citation »E-mail Citation »

    An article of broad scope outlining the relations between water law, water governance, and peacebuilding in post-conflict contexts.

    Find this resource:

  • Griffin, Pamela J., and Saleem H. Ali. “Managing Transboundary Wetlands: The Ramsar Convention as a Means of Ecological Diplomacy.” Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences 4.3 (2014): 230–239.

    Save Citation »Export Citation »E-mail Citation »

    The first study on wetlands under the Ramsar convention and environmental peacebuilding.

    Find this resource:

  • Huda, Mirza Sadaqat, and Saleem H. Ali. “Environmental Peacebuilding in South Asia: Establishing Consensus on Hydroelectric Projects in the Ganges-Brahmaputra-Meghna (GBM) Basin.” Geoforum 96.1 (2018): 160–171.

    Save Citation »Export Citation »E-mail Citation »

    This study focuses on energy (rather than the usual suspects of water or conservation) and international environmental peacebuilding.

    Find this resource:

  • Ide, Tobias, and Amit Tubi. “Education and Environmental Peacebuilding: Insights from Three Projects in Israel and Palestine.” Annals of the Association of American Geographers 110.1 (2020): 1–17.

    Save Citation »Export Citation »E-mail Citation »

    The authors provide a broad discussion on how education can contribute to environmental peacebuilding before discussing empirical evidence from Israel and Palestine.

    Find this resource:

  • Jama, Osman M., Guijian Liu, Abdishakur W. Diriye, Balal Yousaf, Ibrahim Basiru, and Abdulhakim M. Abdi. “Participation of Civil Society in Decisions to Mitigate Environmental Degradation in Post-conflict Societies: Evidence from Somalia.” Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 63.9 (2020): 1695–1715.

    DOI: 10.1080/09640568.2019.1685957Save Citation »Export Citation »E-mail Citation »

    A survey study on civil society participation in environmental management and peacebuilding in Somalia.

    Find this resource:

  • Kelman, Ilan. Disaster Diplomacy: How Disasters Affect Peace and Conflict. London: Routledge, 2012.

    Save Citation »Export Citation »E-mail Citation »

    An important book summarizing a decade of research on the interlinkages among disasters, cooperation, and diplomacy. Valuable for the field despite a lack of references to environmental peacebuilding debates.

    Find this resource:

  • Kyrou, Christons N. “Peace Ecology: An Emerging Paradigm in Peace Studies.” International Journal of Peace Studies 12.1 (2007): 73–92.

    Save Citation »Export Citation »E-mail Citation »

    The author seeks to develop the environmental peacebuilding approach further by broadening it conceptually and methodologically. The contribution is contested, however, as it conceives environmental peacebuilding very narrowly.

    Find this resource:

Relations to Other Fields

Environmental peacebuilding is not the only research field dealing with environmental governance, natural resource management, conflict prevention, and peace. This leads to considerable overlaps with other areas of study, with researchers trying to build bridges and combine insights from different fields. Barnett 2019 criticises the conflict-centred ontology of climate-conflict research and highlights how environmental peacebuilding is a promising approach for climate security studies. In a similar vein, Ide and Scheffran 2014 aim to integrate insights from environmental peacebuilding into climate-conflict research. Ratner, et al. 2013 demonstrate how the governance of the commons literature in the tradition of Elinor Ostrom can enrich and benefit from work on resource conflicts and cooperation. The contribution of Krampe 2017 outlines pathways toward a connection between environmental peacebuilding and mainstream peacebuilding research, while Maertens 2019 draws connections to academic work on peacekeeping. According to Ide 2017, the research field can also profit immensely from drawing on spatial theory as developed by human geographers.

back to top

Article

Up

Down