Polio Eradication in Pakistan
- LAST MODIFIED: 30 March 2017
- DOI: 10.1093/obo/9780199756797-0158
- LAST MODIFIED: 30 March 2017
- DOI: 10.1093/obo/9780199756797-0158
Introduction
Poliomyelitis (polio) is a viral infection that spreads primarily through the fecal-oral route and usually affects children younger than five years of age. After ingestion, the virus multiplies in the intestines and spreads to the nervous system from there, eventually leading to paralysis. Irreversible paralysis is seen in approximately one in every two hundred children that are infected. This paralysis proves fatal in approximately 10 percent of cases when respiratory muscles are involved. Currently, no cure exists for poliomyelitis; however, there are vaccines available which have been successful at significantly reducing the prevalence of this debilitating infection across the world. With a successful vaccination program since 1988, the number of paralyzed persons due to polioviruses has decreased by over 99.9 percent. However, the disease still presents a real threat, especially in Pakistan; this bibliography focuses on the challenges of eradicating disease in this region in particular.
Epidemiology
The epidemiology of polio relates a story of the success of effective vaccination programs. In 1988, there were around 350,000 cases of polio across 125 countries. The goal to eradicate polioviruses worldwide was adopted in 1988 and since then the number of paralyzed persons due to polioviruses has decreased by over 99.9 percent. In 2014, the World Health Organization (WHO) reported 359 cases of paralytic poliomyelitis due to wild polioviruses worldwide (Cases of Wild Poliovirus by Country and Year). In the end of 2015, the remaining endemic areas with wild poliovirus circulation were limited to security-compromised parts of Pakistan and Afghanistan and in Nigeria. In Nigeria, no new cases of polio were reported in 2015, and in September of that year was removed from the list of poliovirus endemic countries (WHO Removes Nigeria from Polio-Endemic List), however the virus emerged again in mid-2016 (Cases of Wild Poliovirus by Country and Year). Despite the dramatic reduction in cases of poliomyelitis, it is proving difficult for the Global Polio Eradication Initiative (GPEI) to finally complete the eradication by interrupting the last chains of transmission in these endemic areas; and export of wild polioviruses from the endemic areas into polio-free countries have occurred in multiple occasions, sometimes causing large outbreaks of poliomyelitis (Hagan, et al. 2015). Polio cases can also be divided into groups by the infecting organism. A majority of the patients reported were infected with the wild poliovirus while only a few were positive for the vaccine-associated poliovirus. The wild poliovirus is the form of the virus found in nature and had three subtypes, one of which was declared extinct in 1999. In contrast, the vaccine-associated form of the virus develops when the attenuated form of the virus that is used for vaccination mutates during replication. However, this is extremely rare and it is estimated that when receiving the first dose of the oral polio vaccine, one in every 2.7 million children develops paralysis. Generally, vaccine-associated strains of the poliovirus do not transmit between hosts as easily as the wild type. However, in certain conditions in severely under-immunized populations the vaccine-associated form of the virus can begin circulating in the community with low herd immunity. WHO reported thirty-two wild poliovirus cases by late 2016 with sixteen cases from Pakistan, twelve cases from Afghanistan, and four cases from Nigeria. Data divided by country for the incidence of polio in 2016 shows that the majority of cases were found in Pakistan and Afghanistan. The difference in incidence rates between Pakistan and other countries highlights the need for a much more effective prevention program in Pakistan. Although the incidence of polio for the year 2016 decreased in Pakistan, there is still a large amount of room for improvement until the last case stands (see the WHO’s Poliomyelitis Fact Sheet, cited under Global Polio Eradication Initiative).
Hagan, J. E., S. G. Wassilak, A. S. Craig, et al. 2015. Progress toward polio eradication––worldwide, 2014–2015. MMWR Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report 64:527–531.
Save Citation »Export Citation » Share Citation »
This resource reports regular updates on poliovirus circulation and new cases globally and country specific data.
Find this resource:
WHO. Cases of Wild Poliovirus by Country and Year. Accessed 27/08/2015.
Save Citation »Export Citation » Share Citation »
This resource provides regular updates on poliovirus circulation and new cases globally and country specific data.
Find this resource:
WHO. WHO Removes Nigeria from Polio-Endemic List. Accessed 11/27/2015.
Save Citation »Export Citation » Share Citation »
This resource provides regular updates on poliovirus circulation and new cases globally and also provides country-specific data.
Find this resource:
WHO. Cases of Wild Poliovirus by Country and Year. Accessed 18/06/2016.
Save Citation »Export Citation » Share Citation »
This resource gives regular updates on poliovirus circulation and new cases globally and country specific data.
Find this resource:
Global Polio Eradication Initiative
The Global Polio Eradication Initiative (GPEI) was first launched in 1988 with four key partners: the World Health Organization (WHO), Rotary International, the United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF), and the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). The program received support from governments across the world and from international welfare organizations such as the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation. The success of the GPEI is evident when examining the decrease in the incidence of polio since the inception of the eradication initiative. The number of polio cases across the world has decreased by 99 percent between 1988 and 2014. The triumph against polio has been gradual but steady, with the WHO Region of the Americas being declared free of polio in 1994. The Western Pacific Region as demarcated by the WHO was cleared of polio in 2000, followed by the European Region in mid-2002. In the first quarter of 2014, the WHO region of South East Asia was declared polio free. According to WHO, Pakistan is classified as part of the Eastern Mediterranean Region which is yet to be cleared of polio. Perhaps the greatest achievement of the GPEI is that currently 80 percent of the world’s population is living in areas that have been certified as polio free. There are over 10 million people today who have been saved from paralysis by the successful polio vaccination program. That in itself is a fact that is worthy of great appreciation; however, the continued success of these programs is contingent on the complete eradication of polio from countries that are still affected by this disease (Poliomyelitis Fact Sheet). Given the ongoing poliovirus circulation and a threat of reemergence of the disease, a polio eradication and endgame strategic plan 2013–2018 was introduced in 2013. This plan has four core objectives which are: to detect and interrupt all poliovirus transmission; to strengthen immunization systems and withdraw oral polio vaccine; to contain poliovirus and certify interruption of transmission; and finally to plan polio’s legacy (Global Polio Eradication Initiative). A major focus outlined in this strategic plan was the ultimate withdrawal of oral polio vaccines (OPV) from all immunization programs globally in a phased manner to mitigate the risks associated with vaccine-derived polio and the immunity gap after type 2 withdrawal and the recommendation of introducing inactivated poliovirus vaccine brought forward (Estivariz, et al. 2013; Patel, et al. 2015; and Garon, et al. 2016).
Estivariz, C. F., M. A. Pallansch, A. Anand, et al. 2013. Poliovirus vaccination options for achieving eradication and securing the endgame. Current Opinion in Virology 3.3 (June): 309–315.
DOI: 10.1016/j.coviro.2013.05.007Save Citation »Export Citation » Share Citation »
The authors of this publication discuss the options of immunization that are available to counter the risk during the withdrawal of the type 2 OPV. In their opinion, including inactivated polio vaccine (IPV) in the routine immunization would be a better option.
Find this resource:
Garon, J., K. Seib, W. A. Orenstein, et al. 2016. Polio endgame: The global switch from tOPV to bOPV. Expert Review of Vaccines 0.0 (11 January): 1–16.
Save Citation »Export Citation » Share Citation »
The experts in this review outlined the strategic activities to counter type 2 outbreak risks after the OPV switch. These strategic activities include the tOPV campaigns, monovalent OPV2 stockpiling to respond to outbreaks should they occur, containment of polioviruses, enhanced surveillance, outbreak response protocols, and ensured access to IPV and bivalent OPV.
Find this resource:
Global Polio Eradication Initiative. 2013. Polio Eradication & Endgame Strategic Plan 2013–2018.
Save Citation »Export Citation » Share Citation »
This web resource provides the detailed information and publication about the Polio Eradication and Endgame Strategic Plan 2013–2018, which is a comprehensive, long-term strategy that addresses what is needed to deliver a polio-free world by 2018.
Find this resource:
Patel, M., S. Zipursky, W. Orenstein, J. Garon, and M. Zaffran. 2015. Polio endgame: The global introduction of inactivated polio vaccine. Expert Rev Vaccines 14.5 (19 January): 749–762.
DOI: 10.1586/14760584.2015.1001750Save Citation »Export Citation » Share Citation »
The authors in this publication concluded that during the end game legacy the introduction of IPV would reduce risks of reintroduction of type 2 poliovirus due to increased seroprotection and interruption of transmission during the outbreaks resulting in an accelerated eradication.
Find this resource:
WHO. Poliomyelitis fact sheet 2016.
Save Citation »Export Citation » Share Citation »
This fact sheet explains basic knowledge and key facts about polio and is being updated every year.
Find this resource:
Polio Vaccines
One of the major reasons for the success of the polio vaccination program is the oral polio vaccine, which was developed by Albert Sabin in 1961. This trivalent vaccine protects against all three strains of the wild poliovirus, one of which has now been declared extinct. In 2016 this trivalent vaccine was replaced by a bivalent oral polio vaccine and trivalent oral polio vaccine is no longer available. The major advantages of this vaccine include the fact that due to oral administration, vaccine teams can consist entirely of volunteers and do not require experienced professionals or sterile injections. This factor also decreases the cost of the vaccination program and makes large-scale programs far more feasible. An additional advantage of the oral vaccine is that it allows for the concurrent administration of oral vitamin A supplementation. This has helped avoid the deaths of approximately 1.5 million children, in addition to the lives saved by polio vaccination (Blume and Geesink 2008; GPEI 2016). The major disadvantage of the oral polio vaccine is that since it is a live vaccine, it can lead to vaccine dependent poliomyelitis in a very small percentage of those who are vaccinated (Platt, et al. 2014). The neurovirulent virus is referred to as vaccine-derived poliovirus (VDPV) and usually has three categories, namely: circulating VDPVs (cVDPVs), immunodeficiency-associated VDPVs (iVDPVs), and ambiguous VDPVs (aVDPVs). Additionally another rare event is vaccine-associated paralytic poliomyelitis (VAPP), a rare event which is associated with oral polio vaccine (OPV) administration, which is caused by a strain of poliovirus that has genetically changed in the intestine from the original attenuated vaccine strain contained in OPV (WHO 2016; Sutter, et al. 2013; Diop, et al. 2015). Additionally, in case of a mutation in a community with low herd immunity the mutated vaccine-derived virus can start circulating in the members of the community and cause polio in unimmunized individuals (John and Jayabal 1972). A bivalent and monovalent alternative of the oral polio vaccine was developed after the eradication of the type 2 strain of the virus. This is more effective than the original trivalent oral vaccine and also offers all the advantages of the original (Sutter, et al. 2010; el-Sayed, et al. 2008). In contrast, the inactivated polio vaccine does not carry any risk for vaccine-dependent poliomyelitis although inactivated polio vaccine (IPV) recipients may get infected but they will not get paralyzed because they are protected against invasion of the central nervous system. However, IPV is more expensive and requires administration via injection by trained health workers. Furthermore, the inactivated vaccine does not confer strong intestinal immunity which means that individuals who ingest the virus will not get infected but can still transmit it to other members of their communities. However, recent studies have demonstrated that IPV can boost both humoral and mucosal immunity and can be used effectively to reduce the immunity gap (John, et al. 2014; Jafari, et al. 2014; and Habib, et al. 2016).
Blume, S., and I. Geesink. 2008. A brief history of polio vaccines. Science 288.5471 (2 June): 1593–1594.
DOI: 10.1126/science.288.5471.1593Save Citation »Export Citation » Share Citation »
This resource discusses the information and knowledge about the vaccines that are available for polio eradication and history of polio vaccines.
Find this resource:
Diop, O. M., Burns, C. C., Sutter, R. W., Wassilak, S. G., Kew, O. M., and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2015). Update on vaccine-derived polioviruses—worldwide, January 2014–March 2015. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report 64.23: 640–646.
Save Citation »Export Citation » Share Citation »
This article by Dip et al. outlines the update on vaccine derived polioviruses wordwide between 2014–15.
Find this resource:
GPEI. 2016. Global Polio Eradication Initiative: The History.
Save Citation »Export Citation » Share Citation »
This resource also reports the information and history of polio vaccines, both OPV and IPV.
Find this resource:
Habib, M. A., Soofi, S., Mach, O. et al. 2016. Effect of booster doses of poliovirus vaccine in previously vaccinated children, Clinical Trial Results 2013. Vaccine 34.33: 3803–3809.
DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2016.05.065Save Citation »Export Citation » Share Citation »
Habib and colleagues provide the evidence that injectable polio vaccine is superior to OPV and significantly boosts immune response and immunity compared to OPV.
Find this resource:
Hird, T. R., and N. C. Grassly. 2012. Systematic review of mucosal immunity induced by oral and inactivated poliovirus vaccines against virus shedding following oral poliovirus challenge. PLoS pathogens 8.4: e1002599.
DOI: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1002599Save Citation »Export Citation » Share Citation »
The authors present a systematic review that was conducted to report mucosal immunity induced by oral and inactivated poliovirus vaccines against virus shedding following oral poliovirus. They concluded that the impact of IPV on poliovirus transmission in endemic countries is unknown but is likely to be limited compared with OPV.
Find this resource:
Jafari, H., J. M. Deshpande, R. W. Sutter, et al. 2014. Polio eradication. Efficacy of inactivated poliovirus vaccine in India. Science 345:922–925.
DOI: 10.1126/science.1255006Save Citation »Export Citation » Share Citation »
The results of this trial show that the IPV reduced excretion for poliovirus types 1 and 3, and IPV in OPV-vaccinated individuals boosts intestinal mucosal immunity.
Find this resource:
John, J., S. Giri, A. S. Karthikeyan, et al. 2014. Effect of a single inactivated poliovirus vaccine dose on intestinal immunity against poliovirus in children previously given oral vaccine: An open-label, randomised controlled trial. The Lancet 384.9953: 1505–1512.
DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)60934-XSave Citation »Export Citation » Share Citation »
The authors of this paper assess the effect of IPV on intestinal immunity in children previously vaccinated with OPV and find a substantial boost in intestinal immunity conferred by a supplementary dose of IPV given to children younger than five years who had previously received OPV.
Find this resource:
John, T. J., and P. Jayabal. 1972. Oral polio vaccination of children in the tropics. I. The poor seroconversion rates and the absence of viral interference. American Journal of Epidemiology 96:263–269.
Save Citation »Export Citation » Share Citation »
This paper relates the importance of OPV and limitations attached to it.
Find this resource:
Jorba, J., O. M. Diop, J. Iber, R. W. Sutter, S. G. Wassilak, and C. C. Burns. 2016. Update on Vaccine-Derived Polioviruses—Worldwide, January 2015–May 2016. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report 65 (5 August): 763–769.
DOI: 10.15585/mmwr.mm6530a3Save Citation »Export Citation » Share Citation »
This resource is available at the CDC website and provides yearly updates on the vaccine-derived polio virus globally.
Find this resource:
Platt, L. R., C. F. Estívariz, and R. W. Sutter. 2014. Vaccine-Associated Paralytic Poliomyelitis: A Review of the Epidemiology and Estimation of the Global Burden. Journal of Infectious Disease 210 suppl. 1 (1 November): S380–S389.
Save Citation »Export Citation » Share Citation »
This publication discusses the epidemiology and estimation of global burden of vaccine-associated paralytic poliomyelitis. The study concludes that universal introduction of inactivated poliovirus vaccine is required to substantially decrease the global VAPP burden by 80–90 percent.
Find this resource:
el-Sayed, N., Y. el-Gamal, A. A. Abbassy, et al. 2008. Monovalent type 1 oral poliovirus vaccine in newborns. The New England Journal of Medicine 359:1655–1665.
DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa0800390Save Citation »Export Citation » Share Citation »
El-Sayed and colleagues provide the evidence for the use of bivalent and monovalent oral polio vaccines since there was a threat of type 2 spread with the use of trivalent vaccine.
Find this resource:
Sutter, R. W., T. J. John, H. Jain, et al. 2010. Immunogenicity of bivalent types 1 and 3 oral poliovirus vaccine: A randomised, double-blind, controlled trial. Lancet 376:1682–1688.
DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)61230-5Save Citation »Export Citation » Share Citation »
This publication shows the immunogenicity of novel bivalent types 1 and 3 oral poliovirus vaccine (bOPV). The findings show the superiority of bOPV compared with tOPV, and the non-inferiority of bOPV compared with mOPV1 and mOPV3.
Find this resource:
Sutter, R. W., O. M. Kew, S. L. Cochi, and R. B. Aylward. 2013. 28–Poliovirus vaccine—live. In Vaccines. 6th ed. Edited by S. A. Plotkin, W. A. Orenstein, and P. A. Offit, 598–645. London: Saunders.
Save Citation »Export Citation » Share Citation »
The chapter written by Sutter and colleagues describes the live poliovirus vaccines and their associated risks and potential mechanisms to mitigate them. Available online for purchase.
Find this resource:
WHO. 2016. Vaccine-derived polioviruses: Managing the risks.
Save Citation »Export Citation » Share Citation »
This resource outlines an account of the vaccine-derived polio viruses, their current counts and strategies to avoid the risk of vaccine-derived polioviruses.
Find this resource:
Pakistan and the EPI
Focusing on the situation in Pakistan, numerous efforts have been made to counter the polio epidemic. The Expanded Program on Immunization (EPI) was first launched over thirty years ago and has dramatically changed the healthcare landscape in Pakistan since its inception. As per the latest report from the Pakistan Demographic Health Survey (PDHS) that was published in 2013, 54 percent of Pakistani children received all their basic vaccinations. This includes one dose of the oral polio vaccine at birth and three subsequent doses at the age of six weeks, ten weeks and fourteen weeks. Looking specifically at polio vaccination rates reported in the PDHS, 85 percent of children received all doses of the polio vaccine in 2013 (Pakistan Demographic and Health Survey). This is an encouraging figure since polio vaccine coverage has seen an almost hundred percent increase from 43 percent in 1990. Polio transmission in Pakistan is not rampant across the country; in 2015 it is limited to 11 of the 152 districts in the country. The three prime areas that need to be targeted in polio eradication programs are the city of Karachi, Quetta and its surrounding areas, and the adjoining regions of the Federally Administered Tribal Areas (FATA) and the Khyber Pakhtunkhwa province. A major problem in the last of the aforementioned regions is that they lie on the Afghanistan border where there is a large amount of unchecked cross border traffic. This leads to residents of each country repeatedly reinfecting each other and compounds the problem of polio eradication in the area. Due to the nature of the disease and risk of further spread from Pakistan into other countries that have already eradicated polio, a national emergency was declared for the interruption of polio transmission. As part of this emergency, a National Emergency Action Plan for Polio Eradication was launched in 2011 with the aim of limiting polio transmission. The plan has been revised three times so far, with the latest revision being published in 2015. Each revision is edited to adapt to the current situation and to increased coverage based on lessons from previous efforts. The original plan focused primarily on a federal effort whereas revisions have increased provincial and district level involvement.
Ministry of Health, Government of Pakistan. 2015–2016. National emergency action plan for polio eradication.
Save Citation »Export Citation » Share Citation »
Pakistan’s Ministry of Health released the National Emergency Action Plan (NEAP) to counter the ongoing polio circulation in the country. The goal of the NEAP 2015–2016 remains to interrupt transmission of wild poliovirus in Pakistan and provides future strategies.
Find this resource:
Pakistan Demographic and Health Survey (PDHS) 2012–2013: National Institute of Population Studies (NIPS) and ICF International.
Save Citation »Export Citation » Share Citation »
PDHS reports the descriptive information and trends of the population level health indicators including polio and other EPI immunization.
Find this resource:
Security and Other Issues
A significant challenge for polio eradication in Pakistan is the history of violence against vaccination teams. Multiple attacks have been carried out against vaccinators who were visiting at-risk populations as part of the polio eradication action plan. These attacks have led to the loss of the lives of healthcare professionals and significantly compounded the problem (Masood 2015; Ali 2014; and CBS News 2012). The threat of violence has become a significant deterrent to vaccination campaigns. Volunteer administration was the original strength of the oral vaccine; fear for personal safety has drastically reduced the number of volunteers. Vaccination campaigns that were initially organized to maximize awareness are now kept at a low profile to ensure the safety of volunteers. Not surprisingly, the areas where violence against vaccinators has been reported most frequently are also the areas where polio transmission is rampant (Bhutta 2014, Bhutta 2013). Another major issue facing the polio vaccination program is the negative representation by those opposing it. The negative image creates insecurity in those who are most susceptible, by labeling vaccination programs as a conspiracy of “Western powers” and using hollow Islamic logic to deter the masses from vaccinating their children (Fetene and Sherani 2014; Shah, et al. 2011). Efforts have been made to work against these perceptions and use the relevant forums to encourage vaccination. Local celebrities have been used as ambassadors for polio vaccination in order to challenge the idea of vaccination being a Western conspiracy. Similarly, vaccination has been endorsed and encouraged by religious scholars and these messages have been propagated through different mediums to reach the maximum number of people (Daily Times). Other steps include integrating polio vaccination with the remainder of the Expanded Program on Immunization (EPI) vaccinations and other preventive health measures in awareness messages so that polio eradication is not singled out as a particular agenda. Another step in the same direction is the creation of community platforms in both social and professional settings to propagate the message without gathering unnecessary attention.
Ali Z. 2014. Four health workers slain in attack on Pakistan vaccination team. LA Times, November 26.
Save Citation »Export Citation » Share Citation »
Los Angeles Times reported the killing of four health workers carrying out a polio vaccination drive on November 26, 2014 in Quetta city of Pakistan.
Find this resource:
Bhutta, Z. A. 2013. “The push and pull for global polio eradication.” Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 107.10: 601–602.
DOI: 10.1093/trstmh/trt075Save Citation »Export Citation » Share Citation »
In his articles published in Nature and Transactions of The Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, Bhutta discusses the security issues involved in polio eradication and how they are influencing the whole campaign against poliovirus circulation.
Find this resource:
Bhutta, Z. A. 2014. Infectious disease: Polio eradication hinges on child health in Pakistan. Nature 511.7509: 285.
DOI: 10.1038/511285aSave Citation »Export Citation » Share Citation »
In this article the author discusses various potential challenges that are involved in polio eradication especially in the context of Pakistan.
Find this resource:
CBS News. 2012. Pakistan polio vaccination workers targeted in fresh attacks; 7 now killed. December 19.
Save Citation »Export Citation » Share Citation »
CBS news reported the killing of seven polio vaccinator carrying out a polio vaccination campaign on December 19, 2012 in Peshawar city of Pakistan.
Find this resource:
Daily Times. Ulema Mashaikh Council endorses polio drive. March 30,
Save Citation »Export Citation » Share Citation »
The Daily Times article published on March 30, 2015 reported the involvement of celebrities and religious leaders and their endorsements of the polio drive.
Find this resource:
Fetene, N. W. and Sherani, A. 2014. Determinant factors for implementing polio eradication activities under security compromised settings of Pakistan. Journal of Tropical Diseases & Public Health.
Save Citation »Export Citation » Share Citation »
In this article the authors provide an account of issues such as negative perceptionsand religious and cultural factors that play a key role in vaccine coverage and refusals in Pakistan.
Find this resource:
Habib M. A, Soofi, S., and Ali, N., et al. 2017. Knowledge and perceptions of polio and polio immunization in polio high-risk areas of Pakistan. Journal of Public Health Policy (January): 1–21.
DOI: 10.1057/s41271-016-0056-6Save Citation »Export Citation » Share Citation »
This recent study published by Habib and colleagues shows the potential gaps in the knowledge and perceptions for polio and its immunization in the Pakistani population.
Find this resource:
Masood, S. Polio team attacked in Pakistan. New York Times, February 14, 2015.
Save Citation »Export Citation » Share Citation »
This news report of New York Times provide information about killing of polio workers on February 14, 2015 in Khyber Agency of Federally Administrated Tribal Areas (FATA)
Find this resource:
Shah, M., M. K. Khan, S. Shakeel, et al. 2011. Resistance of polio to its eradication in Pakistan. Virology Journal 8:457.
DOI: 10.1186/1743-422X-8-457Save Citation »Export Citation » Share Citation »
Shah and colleages provide an account of the resistance to polio and its eradication and discussed a range of factors that are responsible for refusals for polio vaccine in Pakistan.
Find this resource:
Steel Fisher, G. K., R. J. Blendon, S. Guirguis, et al. 2015. Threats to polio eradication in high-conflict areas in Pakistan and Nigeria: A polling study of caregivers of children younger than 5 years. The Lancet Infectious Diseases 15.10 (10 July): 1183–1192.
Save Citation »Export Citation » Share Citation »
This article provides an account of issues such as negative perceptions, as well as religious and cultural factors, that play a key role in the vaccine coverage and refusals.
Find this resource:
Vaccine Refusal
Vaccine refusal is another major problem that has been highlighted since the inception of the National Emergency Action Plan for polio eradication (Khan and Ahmad 2015). Recently reported as 0.14 percent of the target population, the refusal rate for polio vaccination is not very high in Pakistan. However, the issue arises from the fact that most of these refusals are grouped together in areas with high transmission such as Karachi and Khyber Pakhtunkhwa (National Emergency Action Plan for Polio Eradication, cited under Pakistan and the EPI). These are the areas that suffer from high polio transmission (Murakami, et al. 2014). Vaccine refusals usually do not constitute a great healthcare problem due to the presence of herd immunity. However, in such areas where vaccination is already low, refusals further increase the transmission rate. In 2013, 10 percent of the reported polio cases belonged to families that had previously refused vaccination. Social mobilization with community teams is an extremely effective method to decrease the refusal rate. However, with the current security situation and the history of attacks in areas that have both high refusal and transmission rates, social mobilization is not a viable option. These reasons create massive hurdles on the path toward complete polio eradication in Pakistan.
Khan, M. U., and A. Ahmad. 2015. Polio vaccination in Pakistan. The Lancet 386.9991: 337.
DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)61405-2Save Citation »Export Citation » Share Citation »
Khan and Ahmad discuss polio vaccination in Pakistan and highlight the fact that vaccine refusal hinders the efforts of polio eradication in Pakistan.
Find this resource:
Murakami, H., M. Kobayashi, M. Hachiya, Z. S. Khan, S. Q. Hassan, and S. Sakurada. 2014. Refusal of oral polio vaccine in northwestern Pakistan: A qualitative and quantitative study. Vaccine 32.12: 1382–1387.
DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2014.01.018Save Citation »Export Citation » Share Citation »
In a mixed method study Murakami and collegaues discuss the refusals for oral polio vaccine (OPV) and its determinants in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa (KPK) province.
Find this resource:
Lessons from Other Countries
While Pakistan currently seems to be in a dire and incredibly complex situation with respect to polio eradication, India was in a similar situation not very long ago. With one of the largest populations on the planet, polio eradication in India seemed almost impossible. Severe poverty and limited access to certain regions further complicated the struggle against polio in India. However, by mobilizing resources from all levels of government and the healthcare industry, India managed to completely stop polio transmission (John and Vashishtha 2013). Initiatives taken by local agencies and strong support from international organizations made polio eradication possible in India (GPEI 2014). A focused problem-solving approach toward polio eradication was a great catalyst in these efforts. A focused approach with strong direction and political will were some of the most important factors that led to polio eradication in India. The last polio case from India was reported in 2011 and the World Health Organization (WHO) South East Asia region was declared polio free in 2014 (WHO 2014). India has since then served as a lesson and an inspiration for other countries that are still unable to eradicate polio. The story of polio eradication in Bangladesh is entirely different from that of India. As one of the most densely populated countries in the world, Bangladesh posed an enormous challenge in the efforts to limit polio transmission. The major factors behind the successful eradication of polio in Bangladesh were the effectiveness of the Expanded Program on Immunization (EPI), extensive social mobilization, and strong political will. These efforts made it possible for Bangladesh to completely stop polio transmission by the year 2000, fifteen years after the introduction of the EPI in Bangladesh. However, polio re-emerged in Bangladesh in 2006 after it was spread from India where polio transmission was still frequent at the time. The impressive nature of the healthcare efforts throughout the polio eradication campaign became apparent at this time. Within six months of the first case being reported in 2006, Bangladesh was once again able to stop polio transmission. This was possible through swift and extremely effective measures including multiple immunization days within a matter of months. The method by which polio was eradicated in Bangladesh highlights that the EPI can be a very effective tool when combined with the right initiative and a novel approach.
GPEI. 2014. India’s Anniversary: Celebrating Three Years Polio-Free. Global Polio Eradication Initiative.
Save Citation »Export Citation » Share Citation »
This resource provides information about the Indian success with polio eradication and the process and strategies that helped India to achieve this hallmark.
Find this resource:
John, T. J., and V. M. Vashishtha. 2013. Eradicating poliomyelitis: India’s journey from hyperendemic to polio-free status. Indian Journal of Medical Research 137.5 (May): 881–894.
Save Citation »Export Citation » Share Citation »
The article discusses the efforts and achievement of India in eradicating polio.
Find this resource:
WHO, ed. 2014. Polio-free certification: WHO South-East Asia. South-East Asia Regional Certification Commission for Polio Eradication (SEA-RCCPE); 2014. New Delhi: WHO.
Save Citation »Export Citation » Share Citation »
GPEI and WHO resources cited in this work provide an account of polio case count and India cerification confirmation.
Find this resource:
WHO. 2015. Bangladesh: Home-grown solutions helped stop polio and keep this country polio-free. WHO.
Save Citation »Export Citation » Share Citation »
It is a resource from Bangladesh that provides the complete update on how Bangladesh became a polio-free country from a previously hyperendemic country.
Find this resource:
Strategies and Next Steps
In the efforts against polio, Pakistan seems to be up against insurmountable odds. Though India and Bangladesh offer many lessons, the fact remains that Pakistan is unique. The security situation is a constant threat to those who offer their services to help limit polio transmission. Fringe religious groups are still a significant problem since they encourage vaccine refusal and promote anti-vaccine conspiracy theories. Though the story of polio eradication in Bangladesh is an inspiring one, the strategies implemented in India are more useful in regard to Pakistan. By developing a new model based on the Indian approach it is possible to tackle the polio problem in a manner different than the one that has failed the country previously. The National Emergency Action Plan for Polio Eradication (cited under Pakistan and the EPI) which commenced in the year 2015, provided the strategic directions which underscore the importance of effective vaccination efforts combined with monitoring and surveillance. The NEAP emphasizes the following: the importance of increasing the quality of all polio eradication activities; increasing programmatic access and reach; placing frontline workers at the center of the polio eradication initiative; expanding continuous community-protected vaccinations; ensuring integration of planning and implementation of operations; ensuring security and communications; monitoring of performance and increased accountability at all levels; reviewing and enhancing acute flaccid paralysis (AFP) surveillance sensitivity and quality; enhancing seroconversion through targeted IPV introduction; and expanding and implementing the outbreak response strategy. The important ingredient in the recipe for success is the availability of help from international organizations in polio eradication programs. Backing from these powerful health agencies was one of the key factors that helped limit polio transmission in India and Bangladesh. Though this help has been made available to Pakistan, the lack of strong local leadership and consolidated effort made significant progress unlikely. However, support has been offered to the provincial government for the latest initiative in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa by the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation. A strong and effective partnership between the local government and resourceful international organizations can go a long way in solving the polio problem in Pakistan. However, the leadership must bear in mind that without an effective strategy and a focused group of critical thinkers these efforts may once again be doomed for failure. Pakistan has the resources to tackle the problem; however, it needs to mobilize those resources in an effective manner and local leaders need to go the extra mile in order to bring an end to polio in Pakistan. Further, after the recent Strategic Advisory Group of Experts (SAGE) recommendation for the introduction of IPV in the routine immunization program. It is imperative to develop innovative strategies to enhance delivery of vaccines through the health system thereby strengthening routine immunization to gain maximum coverage. Although poliovirus circulation has been stubborn, it is confined to some distinct geography, and with a concerted effort and innovations it can be tackled effectively (Bhutta 2014, Bhutta 2013).
Bhutta, Z. A. 2013. “The push and pull for global polio eradication.” Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 107.10: 601–602.
DOI: 10.1093/trstmh/trt075Save Citation »Export Citation » Share Citation »
In articles published in both Nature and Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, Bhutta ZA has provided recommendations and way forward for Pakistan to achieve the goal of polio eradication.
Find this resource:
Bhutta, Z. A. 2014. Infectious disease: Polio eradication hinges on child health in Pakistan. Nature 511.7509: 285.
DOI: 10.1038/511285aSave Citation »Export Citation » Share Citation »
This Lancet article provides an account of polio burden and the strategies to counter the continued circulation of polio in Pakistan.
Find this resource:
Article
- Abortion
- Access to Health Care
- Action Research
- Active Aging
- Active Living
- Addiction
- Adolescent Health, Socioeconomic Inequalities in
- Adolescent Risk-Taking Behavior in the United States
- Advocacy, Public Health
- Agricultural Safety and Public Health
- Air Quality: Health Effects
- Air Quality: Indoor Health Effects
- Alcohol Availability and Violence
- Alternative Research Designs
- Ambient Air Quality Standards and Guidelines
- American Perspectives on Chronic Disease and Control
- Antimicrobial Resistance (AMR)
- Arts in Health
- Asbestos
- Asthma in Children
- Asthma, Work-Related
- Attachment as a Health Determinant
- Behavior
- Behavior Change Theory in Health Education and Promotion
- Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance
- Bicycling and Cycling Safety
- Bioethics
- Birth and Death Registration
- Birth Cohort Studies
- Board of Health
- Breastfeeding
- Built Environment and Health, The
- Business and Corporate Practices
- Cancer Communication Strategies in North America
- Cancer Prevention
- Cancer Screening
- Capacity Building
- Capacity Building for NCDs in LMICs
- Capacity-Building for Applied Public Health in LMIC: A US ...
- Cardiovascular Health and Disease
- Child Labor
- Child Maltreatment
- Children, Air Pollution and
- Children, Injury Risk-Taking Behaviors in
- Children, Obesity in
- Citizen Advisory Boards
- Climate Change and Human Health
- Climate Change: Institutional Response
- Clinical Preventive Medicine
- Community Air Pollution
- Community Development
- Community Gardens
- Community Health Assessment
- Community Health Interventions
- Community Partnerships and Coalitions
- Community-Based Participatory Research
- Complexity and Systems Theory
- Cultural Safety
- Culture and Public Health
- Definition of Health
- Dental Public Health
- Design and Health
- Dietary Guidelines
- Directions in Global Public Health Graduate Education
- Driving and Public Health
- Ecological Approaches
- Enabling Factors
- Environmental Health, Pediatric
- Environmental Laws
- Environmental Protection Agency
- Ethics of Public Health
- Evidence-Based Pediatric Dentistry
- Evidence-Based Public Health Practice
- Family Planning Services and Birth Control
- Food Safety
- Food Security and Food Banks
- Food Systems
- Frail Elderly
- Functional Literacy
- Genomics, Public Health
- Geographic Information Systems
- Geography and Health
- Global Health
- Global Health Diplomacy
- Global Health Promotion
- Global Health Security
- Guide to Community Preventive Services, The
- Health Administration
- Health Communication
- Health Disparities
- Health Education
- Health Impact Assessment
- Health in All Policies
- Health in All Policies in European Countries
- Health Literacy
- Health Literacy and Non-Communicable Diseases
- Health Measurement Scales
- Health Planning
- Health Promoting Hospitals
- Health Promotion
- Health Promotion Foundations
- Health Promotion Workforce Capacity
- Health Promotion Workforce Capacity
- Health Systems of Low and Middle-Income Countries, The
- Healthy People Initiative
- Healthy Public Policy
- Hepatitis C
- High Risk Prevention Strategies
- Homelessness
- Human Rights, Health and
- Human Sexuality and Sexual Health: A Western Perspective
- IANPHI and National Public Health Institutes
- Immigrant Populations
- Immunization and Pneumococcal Infection
- Immunization in Pregnancy
- Indigenous Peoples, Public Health and
- Indigenous Populations of North America, Australasia, and ...
- Indoor Air Quality Guidelines
- Inequities
- Infant Mortality
- Internet Applications in Promoting Health Behavior
- Intersectoral Action
- Intersectoral Strategies in Low - Middle Income Countries ...
- Justice, Social
- Knowledge Translation and Exchange
- Knowledge Utilization and Exchange
- Law of Public Health in the United States
- Media Advocacy
- Mental Health
- Mental Health Promotion
- Migrant Health
- Migrant Worker Health
- Motor Vehicle Injury Prevention
- Multi-Drug-Resistant Tuberculosis
- Nanotechnology
- National Association of Local Boards of Health
- National Public Health Institutions
- Needs Assessment
- Needs Assessments in International Disasters and Emergenci...
- Obesity Prevention
- Occupational Cancers
- Occupational Exposure to Benzene
- Occupational Exposure to Erionite
- Occupational Safety and Health
- Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA)
- Oral Health Equity for Minority Populations in the United ...
- Ottawa Charter
- Parenting and Work
- Parenting Skills and Capacity
- Participatory Action Research
- Patient Decision Making
- Pesticide Exposure and Pesticide Health Effects
- Pesticides
- Physical Activity and Exercise
- Physical Activity Promotion
- Pneumoconiosis
- Polio Eradication in Pakistan
- Population Aging
- Population Determinants of Unhealthy Foods and Beverages
- Population Health Objectives and Targets
- Precautionary Principle
- Prenatal Health
- Preparedness
- Program Evaluation in American Health Education
- Program Planning and Evaluation
- Public Health, History of
- Public Health Surveillance
- Public-Private Partnerships in Public Health Research and ...
- Public-Private Partnerships to Prevent and Manage Obesity ...
- Quantitative Microbial Risk Assessment
- Radiological and Nuclear Emergencies
- Randomized Controlled Trials
- Real World Evaluation Strategies
- Reducing Obesity-Related Health Disparities in Hispanic an...
- Research Integrity in Public Health
- Resilient Health Systems
- Rural Health in the United States
- Safety, Patient
- School Health Programs in the Pacific Region
- Sex Education in HIV/AIDS Prevention
- Silicosis
- Skin Cancer Prevention
- Smoking Cessation
- Social Determinants of Health
- Social Epidemiology
- Social Marketing
- Statistics in Public Health
- STI Networks, Patterns, and Control Strategies
- Stillbirths
- Suicide
- Sustainable Development Goals
- Systems in the United States, Public Health
- Systems Modeling and Big Data for Non-Communicable Disease...
- Systems Theory in Public Health
- Traditional, Complementary, Alternative, and Integrative M...
- Translation of Science to Practice and Policy
- Traumatic Stress and Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder
- Tuberculosis among Adults and the Determinants of Health
- UK Public Health Systems
- Unintentional Injury Prevention
- Urban Health
- Vaccination, Mandatory
- Vaccine Hesitancy
- Vermiculite
- Violence Prevention
- War
- Water Quality
- Water Quality and Water-Related Disease
- Weight Management in US Occupational Settings
- Welfare States, Public Health and Health Inequalities
- Workforce
- Worksite Health Promotion
- World Health Organization (WHO)