It is widely recognized that children who encounter sensitive and responsive interactions in their settings go on to demonstrate superior cognitive, linguistic, and social skills. At the same time, with mothers either choosing or having to work, young children can expect to spend more of their time in nonfamilial paid care of different kinds. Researchers have therefore increasingly become interested in the role which affective, nonrational skills and dispositions may play in professional practice and the place of concepts such as love, care, and compassion in embodied professional knowledge. Because of the age and vulnerability of the children, research and practice within early childhood education and care (ECEC) is extremely sensitive to the importance of child protection. Therefore, a key intention within commentary and discussion is to redefine the notions of “love” and “passion” within a professional context so that the sexual connotations are removed. Research into love and care in ECEC highlights the cultural bias which prevents it from being taken seriously as a professional undertaking. For example, the distinction between high-status education and low-status care is symptomatic of a Platonic legacy in which the life of the body is inferior to the life of the mind. Care is also associated with the supposedly nonintellectual, private, domestic work of women within patriarchy and stands in contrast to the public, remunerated work of men within the domain of reason and language. Research into the nature and cause of close, nurturing relationships between practitioners and children therefore often has the implicit aim of overcoming such dichotomies, demonstrating that the personal and public/political domains are interrelated and that “love” may be a necessary part of intelligent professional practice. All researchers agree that ECEC is a deeply gendered occupation in that the workforce is overwhelmingly female. This state of affairs is significant since it is therefore impossible to consider the place of love and care in this practice without also considering the rights and agency of women in the labor market. Research has therefore started to make use of feminist theories, particularly a philosophical ethic of care, to justify and champion early childhood work as a form of ethical praxis, rather than as an expression of innate female biology. With this in mind, a key concern relates to the extent to which programs for pre-service practitioners can help to cultivate professional dispositions of love and care in a gender-neutral way.
Young children’s need for love and care in their early years is usually explained by reference to the attachment theory of evolutionary theorist John Bowlby. This argues that the survival chances of newborn mammals are enhanced by an innate capacity for care-seeking and bonding with the primary carer. The importance of early attachments has been given thorough support through further experiments in neuroscience, as discussed by Gerhardt 2004 and Music 2016. The implications of this understanding for early childhood practice are explained in works such as Elfer, et al. 2003, which recommend “key working” or “primary caregiving” whereby each child has a named adult with whom they can develop a consistent attachment. Moreover, despite some guilt and ambivalence, most parents, in their absence, expect practitioners to develop close, responsive relationships with their children, as indicated by Ebbeck and Yim 2009 and also Page 2011. Page 2013 observes that this ambivalence is a common phenomenon among newly employed mothers who are spending fewer hours with their child but anticipating attachment-led practice in the nursery. As in Degotardi and Pearson 2014, love and care are often addressed implicitly within studies of pedagogical approaches that prioritize the interpersonal relationship. Relationship, as well as being a Vygotskian tool of learning, is the symbol of trust and emotional connection in human beings. However, although many early childhood approaches emphasize this importance (i.e., “relational pedagogy”), not all of them provide practical guidance on how practitioners can enhance trust and responsiveness in these relationships, thereby maximizing love and care. The exception is the “educaring” approach devised by Magda Gerber and most fully explained by Petrie and Owen 2005. More recently, a concept of “professional love” is introduced in Page 2011 and then more fully defined in Page 2018. There is also evidence of attempts to cast light on the caring work of practitioners by drawing upon concepts used in nursing, such as the discussion of presence in Goodfellow 2008 and the consideration of compassion in Taggart 2016.
Degotardi, Sheila, and Emma Pearson. The Relationship Worlds of Infants and Toddlers: Multiple Perspectives from Early Years Theory and Practice. Maidenhead, UK: OU Press, 2014.
Takes as its starting point the idea of the “early childhood setting as a relationship-rich context” and uses this as a lens to view the work of practitioners in facilitating and sustaining various kinds of relationship. Whether children are transitioning into the group setting, forming bonds of trust, or developing understanding of other minds, allowing and valuing positive connections which aid learning and development is a key aspect of early childhood work.
Ebbeck, Marjory, and Hoi Yin Bonnie Yim. “Rethinking Attachment: Fostering Positive Relationships between Infants, Toddlers and Their Primary Caregivers.” Early Child Development and Care 179.7 (2009): 899–909.
Semi-structured interviews with economically diverse parents and trained practitioners (n=10) in an Australian context provide detailed views on the ideal relationship which practitioners should cultivate with children. Love, bonding, and nurturing are terms which feature strongly and support is given for a “primary caregiver” role.
Elfer, Peter, Eleanor Goldschmied, and Dorothy Selleck. Key Persons in the Nursery: Building Relationships for Quality Provision. Maidenhead, UK: OU Press, 2003.
Builds upon research which shows that children can easily become managed in an indiscriminate and depersonalized way within institutions so that they receive very little continuity of attention. A “key person” approach is advocated to prevent this.
Gerhardt, Sue. Why Love Matters: How Affection Shapes a Baby’s Brain. London: Routledge, 2004.
This is a seminal and comprehensive work which provides a strong justification for a relationship-based pedagogy rooted in attachment theory. Gerhardt summarizes neurological research and explains the significance for parents and practitioners.
Goodfellow, Joy. “Presence as a Dimension of Early Childhood Professional Practice.” Australian Journal of Early Childhood 33.1 (2008): 17–23.
The paper applies the phenomenological concept of presence from nursing theory to argue that alert receptivity and connectedness to relational processes are equally important for early childhood practitioners.
Music, Graham. Nurturing Natures: Attachment and Children’s Emotional, Sociocultural and Brain Development. London: Routledge, 2016.
This publication is broader in scope compared to Gerhardt, focusing more upon the ways in which sociocultural practices of adoption and childcare impact upon neurological development. It is also more detailed in focusing upon ways in which siblings, peers, and parents (both gay and straight) contribute to the process. Music is particularly insightful regarding the impact of stress and attachment style on the development of empathy in children and the growth of prosocial, moral behavior.
Page, Jools. “Do Mothers Want Professional Carers to Love Their Babies?” Journal of Early Childhood Research 9.3 (2011): 310–323.
The paper outlines research into the views of mothers regarding the relationships they would like practitioners to have with their children and coins the term “professional love” to describe them. The term intentionally signifies the complexity and ambivalence experienced by practitioners who simultaneously offer responsive care while maintaining a semi-objective and detached position.
Page, Jools. “Will the ‘Good’ [Working] Mother Please Stand Up? Professional and Maternal Concerns about Education, Care and Love.” Gender and Education 25.5 (2013): 548–563.
This illuminating qualitative study focuses on the case study of an early years advisor who is also a mother and highlights the emotional complexity of the process involved in arranging childcare, since these two identities would sometimes be in conflict.
Page, Jools. “Characterising the Principles of Professional Love in Early Childhood Care and Education.” International Journal of Early Years Education 26.2 (2018): 125–141.
Page theorizes that a “triangle of love” ideally exists between practitioner, parent, and child in which the parent manages her guilt sufficiently in order to permit a close and responsive relationship between practitioner and child. Simultaneously, the practitioner has sufficient capacity to decenter from their own concerns and focus on the child. The child is then able to move between both adults and take full advantage of both relationships.
Petrie, Pat, and Sue Owen. Authentic Relationships in Group Care for Infants and Toddlers: Resources for Infant Educarers (RIE): Principles into Practice. London: Jessica Kingsley, 2005.
Probably the most useful summary of the “educaring” approach developed by Magda Gerber, showing how it can be applied in early childhood settings which may not have encountered it before.
Taggart, Geoff. “Compassionate Pedagogy: The Ethics of Care in Early Childhood Professionalism.” European Early Childhood Education Research Journal 24.2 (2016): 173–185.
Aims to resolve a tension between advocates of a psychological, attachment-based pedagogy and advocates of a pedagogy based on children’s social rights who argue that attachment-based practice restricts children’s capacity to explore and take risks. The central argument is that compassion can be understood both psychologically and socially and that “compassionate pedagogy” can uphold both “rights” and “care” while foregrounding the ethical dimension of early childhood education and care (ECEC) work.
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content on this page. Please subscribe or login.
- Abduction of Children
- Aboriginal Childhoods
- Addams, Jane
- ADHD, Sociological Perspectives on
- Adolescence and Youth
- Adolescent Consent to Medical Treatment
- Adoption and Fostering
- Adoption and Fostering, History of Cross-Country
- Advertising and Marketing, Psychological Approaches to
- Advertising and Marketing, Sociocultural Approaches to
- Africa, Children and Young People in
- African American Children and Childhood
- After-school Hours and Activities
- Animals, Children and
- Animations, Comic Books, and Manga
- Anthropology of Childhood
- Archaeology of Childhood
- Ariès, Philippe
- Attachment in Children and Adolescents
- Australia, History of Adoption and Fostering in
- Australian Indigenous Contexts and Childhood Experiences
- Autism, Females and
- Autism, Medical Model Perspectives on
- Best Interest of the Child
- Bioarchaeology of Childhood
- Body, Children and the
- Body Image
- Boy Scouts/Girl Guides
- Bronfenbrenner, Urie
- Bruner, Jerome
- Buddhist Views of Childhood
- Byzantine Childhoods
- Child Beauty Pageants
- Child Homelessness
- Child Protection
- Child Public Health
- Child Trafficking and Slavery
- Childcare Manuals
- Childhood and Borders
- Childhood as Discourse
- Children and Film-Making
- Children and Social Media
- Children and Sustainable Cities
- Children as Language Brokers
- Children as Perpetrators of Crime
- Children in the Industrial Revolution
- Children with Autism in a Brazilian Context
- Children, Young People, and Architecture
- Children's Humor
- Children’s Museums
- Children’s Reading Development and Instruction
- Children's Views of Childhood
- China, Japan, and Korea
- China’s One Child Policy
- Civil Rights Movement and Desegregation
- Classical World, Children in the
- Clothes and Costume, Children’s
- Colonization and Nationalism
- Common World Childhoods
- Competitiveness, Children and
- Congenital Disabilities
- Constructivist Approaches to Childhood
- Consumer Culture, Children and
- Consumption, Child and Teen
- Conversation Analysis and Research with Children
- Critical Approaches to Children’s Work and the Concept of ...
- Critical Perspectives on Boys’ Circumcision
- Discipline and Punishment
- Disney, Walt
- Divorce And Custody
- Domestic Violence
- Drawings, Children’s
- Early Childhood
- Eating disorders and obesity
- Environment, Children and the
- Environmental Education and Children
- Ethics in Research with Children
- Evolutionary Studies of Childhood
- Fairy Tales and Folktales
- Female Genital Cutting
- Feral and "Wild" Children
- Fetuses and Embryos
- Films about Children
- Films for Children
- Foundlings and Abandoned Children
- Freud, Anna
- Freud, Sigmund
- Friends and Peers: Psychological Perspectives
- Froebel, Friedrich
- Gay and Lesbian Parents
- Gender and Childhood
- Geographies, Children's
- Hall, G. Stanley
- Happiness in Children
- Hindu Views of Childhood and Child Rearing
- Hispanic Childhoods (U.S.)
- Historical Approaches to Child Witches
- History of Adoption and Fostering in Canada
- History of Childhood in America
- History of Childhood in Canada
- HIV/AIDS, Growing Up with
- Images of Childhood, Adulthood, and Old Age in Children’s ...
- Infancy and Ethnography
- Infant Mortality in a Global Context
- Innocence and Childhood
- Institutional Care
- Intercultural Learning and Teaching with Children
- Islamic Views of Childhood
- Japan, Childhood in
- Juvenile Detention in the US
- Key, Ellen
- Klein, Melanie
- Labor, Child
- Latin America
- Learning, Language
- Learning to Write
- Legends, Contemporary
- Literary Representations of Childhood
- Literature, Children's
- Love and Care in the Early Years
- Magazines for Teenagers
- Maltreatment, Child
- Marxism and Childhood
- Material Cultures of Western Childhoods
- Media Culture, Children's
- Medieval and Anglo-Saxon Childhoods
- Middle Childhood
- Middle East
- Multi-culturalism and Education
- Music and Babies
- Native American and Aboriginal Canadian Childhood
- New Reproductive Technologies and Assisted Conception
- Nursery Rhymes
- Organizations, Nongovernmental
- Parental Gender Preferences, The Social Construction of
- Pediatrics, History of
- Peer Culture
- Peter Pan
- Philosophy and Childhood
- Piaget, Jean
- Politics, Children and
- Postcolonial Childhoods
- Poverty, Rights, and Well-being, Child
- Prostitution and Pornography, Child
- Queer Theory and Childhood
- Race and Ethnicity
- Racism, Children and
- Radio, Children, and Young People
- Readers, Children as
- Refugee and Displaced Children
- Rights, Children’s
- Risk and Resilience
- School Shootings
- Sex Education in the United States
- Social and Cultural Capital of Childhood
- Social Movements, Children's
- Social Policy, Children and
- Socialization and Child Rearing
- Sociology of Childhood
- South African Birth to Twenty Project
- South Asia
- Special Education
- Spiritual Development in Childhood and Adolescence
- Spock, Benjamin
- Sports and Organized Games
- Street Children
- Street Children And Brazil
- Sure Start
- Teenage Fathers
- Teenage Pregnancy
- The Bible and Children
- The Harms and Prevention of Drugs and Alcohol on Children
- The Spaces of Childhood
- Theories, Pedagogic
- Transgender Children
- Twins and Multiple Births
- United Kingdom, History of Adoption and Fostering in the
- United States, Schooling in the
- Value of Children
- Views of Childhood, Jewish and Christian
- Violence, Children and
- Visual Representations of Childhood
- Voice, Participation, and Agency
- Vygotsky, Lev and His Cultural-historical Approach to Deve...
- Welfare Law in the United States, Child
- Well-Being, Child
- Western Europe and Scandinavia
- Witchcraft in the Contemporary World, Children and
- Work and Apprenticeship, Children's
- Young Carers
- Young Children’s Imagination
- Young Lives
- Young People, Alcohol, and Urban Life
- Young People and Disadvantaged Environments in Affluent Co...